综合评估用于风速和功率预测的机器学习和深度学习算法

Haytham Elmousalami , Hadi Hesham Elmesalami , Mina Maxi , Ahmed Abdel Kader Mohamed Farid , Nehal Elshaboury
{"title":"综合评估用于风速和功率预测的机器学习和深度学习算法","authors":"Haytham Elmousalami ,&nbsp;Hadi Hesham Elmesalami ,&nbsp;Mina Maxi ,&nbsp;Ahmed Abdel Kader Mohamed Farid ,&nbsp;Nehal Elshaboury","doi":"10.1016/j.dajour.2024.100527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate wind speed and power predictions are crucial for renewable wind energy applications. This study compares and evaluates twelve machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms, including single and ensemble models across various time scales from 10 min to a day and a half ahead with a particular focus on ensemble prediction algorithms. Moreover, the study proposes a wind speed and power prediction system where the outcome of the wind speed prediction (WSP) model serves as input for the wind power prediction (WPP) model. Several evaluation metrics, such as mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and mean square error (MSE) were calculated to benchmark different model accuracies. For WSP, the extremely randomized trees, decision tree, and bagging ensemble algorithms demonstrated high accuracy across different time scales where the MAPE ranged from 3.4% to 9.2%, the MSE ranged from 0.17 to 1.15, and the adjusted coefficient of determination ranged from 94% to 99%. For WPP, bagging ensemble algorithms and extremely randomized trees were also effective for predicting different time scales where the MAPE ranged from 4.12% to 11.7% and the MSE ranged from 10945 to 2.4. Ensemble ML algorithms provide better and more accurate results than single ML algorithms. The extreme gradient boosting model showed relatively small computational time and memory according to computational cost. Moreover, this study conducted a sensitivity analysis where air pressure, wind vane, and humidity were the key predictors for WSP and WPP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100357,"journal":{"name":"Decision Analytics Journal","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100527"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive evaluation of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for wind speed and power prediction\",\"authors\":\"Haytham Elmousalami ,&nbsp;Hadi Hesham Elmesalami ,&nbsp;Mina Maxi ,&nbsp;Ahmed Abdel Kader Mohamed Farid ,&nbsp;Nehal Elshaboury\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dajour.2024.100527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Accurate wind speed and power predictions are crucial for renewable wind energy applications. This study compares and evaluates twelve machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms, including single and ensemble models across various time scales from 10 min to a day and a half ahead with a particular focus on ensemble prediction algorithms. Moreover, the study proposes a wind speed and power prediction system where the outcome of the wind speed prediction (WSP) model serves as input for the wind power prediction (WPP) model. Several evaluation metrics, such as mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and mean square error (MSE) were calculated to benchmark different model accuracies. For WSP, the extremely randomized trees, decision tree, and bagging ensemble algorithms demonstrated high accuracy across different time scales where the MAPE ranged from 3.4% to 9.2%, the MSE ranged from 0.17 to 1.15, and the adjusted coefficient of determination ranged from 94% to 99%. For WPP, bagging ensemble algorithms and extremely randomized trees were also effective for predicting different time scales where the MAPE ranged from 4.12% to 11.7% and the MSE ranged from 10945 to 2.4. Ensemble ML algorithms provide better and more accurate results than single ML algorithms. The extreme gradient boosting model showed relatively small computational time and memory according to computational cost. Moreover, this study conducted a sensitivity analysis where air pressure, wind vane, and humidity were the key predictors for WSP and WPP.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decision Analytics Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100527\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decision Analytics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772662224001310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Analytics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772662224001310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确的风速和功率预测对可再生风能的应用至关重要。本研究比较和评估了12种机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)算法,包括从10分钟到一天半的不同时间尺度上的单一和集成模型,特别关注集成预测算法。此外,本文还提出了一种风速和功率预测系统,该系统将风速预测(WSP)模型的结果作为风力预测(WPP)模型的输入。计算了几个评估指标,如平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)和均方误差(MSE),以基准不同的模型精度。对于WSP,极端随机树、决策树和bagging集成算法在不同的时间尺度上表现出较高的准确性,MAPE范围为3.4% ~ 9.2%,MSE范围为0.17 ~ 1.15,调整后的决定系数范围为94% ~ 99%。对于WPP,套袋集成算法和极度随机树也能有效预测不同时间尺度的WPP, MAPE范围为4.12% ~ 11.7%,MSE范围为10945 ~ 2.4。集成机器学习算法比单个机器学习算法提供更好、更准确的结果。根据计算成本,极值梯度增强模型的计算时间和内存相对较小。此外,本研究还进行了敏感性分析,其中气压、风向标和湿度是WSP和WPP的关键预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comprehensive evaluation of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for wind speed and power prediction
Accurate wind speed and power predictions are crucial for renewable wind energy applications. This study compares and evaluates twelve machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms, including single and ensemble models across various time scales from 10 min to a day and a half ahead with a particular focus on ensemble prediction algorithms. Moreover, the study proposes a wind speed and power prediction system where the outcome of the wind speed prediction (WSP) model serves as input for the wind power prediction (WPP) model. Several evaluation metrics, such as mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and mean square error (MSE) were calculated to benchmark different model accuracies. For WSP, the extremely randomized trees, decision tree, and bagging ensemble algorithms demonstrated high accuracy across different time scales where the MAPE ranged from 3.4% to 9.2%, the MSE ranged from 0.17 to 1.15, and the adjusted coefficient of determination ranged from 94% to 99%. For WPP, bagging ensemble algorithms and extremely randomized trees were also effective for predicting different time scales where the MAPE ranged from 4.12% to 11.7% and the MSE ranged from 10945 to 2.4. Ensemble ML algorithms provide better and more accurate results than single ML algorithms. The extreme gradient boosting model showed relatively small computational time and memory according to computational cost. Moreover, this study conducted a sensitivity analysis where air pressure, wind vane, and humidity were the key predictors for WSP and WPP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信