生态系统框架与信息中介共振:亚马逊的早期(1995-2003)

IF 10.9 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Llewellyn D.W. Thomas , Yuliya Snihur
{"title":"生态系统框架与信息中介共振:亚马逊的早期(1995-2003)","authors":"Llewellyn D.W. Thomas ,&nbsp;Yuliya Snihur","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing research into entrepreneurial framing has investigated how entrepreneurs use leadership, abstraction and familiarity emphasis in their framing to build legitimacy. However, how the media and financial analysts resonate with such framing is not known. Media and financial analysts are important information intermediaries that evaluate ecosystems and their orchestrators, as they are expert monitors offering consolidated assessments. Accordingly, we examine how the media and financial analysts resonate with the framing of a novel value proposition through an in-depth longitudinal case study of Amazon's early years. We found that Amazon differentially deployed leadership, abstraction, and familiarity framing between 1995 and 2003, decreasing leadership and increasing abstraction emphasis over time, while keeping familiarity constant. Information intermediaries resonated differently with framing: financial analysts focused more on the projective growth possibilities of the emerging ecosystem and its orchestrator, and the media focused more on real-world implications of the novel value proposition. We contribute insights about the process of entrepreneurial framing in emerging ecosystem contexts and highlight the various trade-offs that ecosystem orchestrators face when seeking resonance with the media and financial analysts. We also offer methodological suggestions for research on framing resonance that leverages linguistic analysis techniques.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 103159"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecosystem framing and infomediary resonance: Amazon’s early years (1995–2003)\",\"authors\":\"Llewellyn D.W. Thomas ,&nbsp;Yuliya Snihur\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Existing research into entrepreneurial framing has investigated how entrepreneurs use leadership, abstraction and familiarity emphasis in their framing to build legitimacy. However, how the media and financial analysts resonate with such framing is not known. Media and financial analysts are important information intermediaries that evaluate ecosystems and their orchestrators, as they are expert monitors offering consolidated assessments. Accordingly, we examine how the media and financial analysts resonate with the framing of a novel value proposition through an in-depth longitudinal case study of Amazon's early years. We found that Amazon differentially deployed leadership, abstraction, and familiarity framing between 1995 and 2003, decreasing leadership and increasing abstraction emphasis over time, while keeping familiarity constant. Information intermediaries resonated differently with framing: financial analysts focused more on the projective growth possibilities of the emerging ecosystem and its orchestrator, and the media focused more on real-world implications of the novel value proposition. We contribute insights about the process of entrepreneurial framing in emerging ecosystem contexts and highlight the various trade-offs that ecosystem orchestrators face when seeking resonance with the media and financial analysts. We also offer methodological suggestions for research on framing resonance that leverages linguistic analysis techniques.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technovation\",\"volume\":\"140 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224002098\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224002098","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现有的关于创业框架的研究已经调查了企业家如何在他们的框架中使用领导力、抽象和熟悉性来建立合法性。然而,媒体和金融分析师如何与这种框架产生共鸣尚不清楚。媒体和金融分析师是评估生态系统及其协调者的重要信息中介,因为他们是提供综合评估的专家监督者。因此,我们通过对亚马逊早期的纵向深入案例研究,来研究媒体和金融分析师是如何与新价值主张的框架产生共鸣的。我们发现,亚马逊在1995年至2003年间对领导力、抽象和熟悉度框架的部署存在差异,随着时间的推移,领导力逐渐减弱,抽象程度不断提高,而熟悉度保持不变。信息中介对框架产生了不同的共鸣:金融分析师更关注新兴生态系统及其协调者的预测增长可能性,而媒体更关注新价值主张的现实含义。我们提供了关于新兴生态系统背景下创业框架过程的见解,并强调了生态系统协调者在寻求与媒体和金融分析师产生共鸣时所面临的各种权衡。我们还提供了利用语言分析技术研究框架共振的方法建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ecosystem framing and infomediary resonance: Amazon’s early years (1995–2003)
Existing research into entrepreneurial framing has investigated how entrepreneurs use leadership, abstraction and familiarity emphasis in their framing to build legitimacy. However, how the media and financial analysts resonate with such framing is not known. Media and financial analysts are important information intermediaries that evaluate ecosystems and their orchestrators, as they are expert monitors offering consolidated assessments. Accordingly, we examine how the media and financial analysts resonate with the framing of a novel value proposition through an in-depth longitudinal case study of Amazon's early years. We found that Amazon differentially deployed leadership, abstraction, and familiarity framing between 1995 and 2003, decreasing leadership and increasing abstraction emphasis over time, while keeping familiarity constant. Information intermediaries resonated differently with framing: financial analysts focused more on the projective growth possibilities of the emerging ecosystem and its orchestrator, and the media focused more on real-world implications of the novel value proposition. We contribute insights about the process of entrepreneurial framing in emerging ecosystem contexts and highlight the various trade-offs that ecosystem orchestrators face when seeking resonance with the media and financial analysts. We also offer methodological suggestions for research on framing resonance that leverages linguistic analysis techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信