对Borgatti-Everett核心-外围模型的修正:分类间密度块和部分连通核心

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
José Luis Estévez , Carl Nordlund
{"title":"对Borgatti-Everett核心-外围模型的修正:分类间密度块和部分连通核心","authors":"José Luis Estévez ,&nbsp;Carl Nordlund","doi":"10.1016/j.socnet.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Borgatti and Everett's model (2000) remains the prevailing standard for identifying categorical core-periphery structures in empirical networks, yet this method poses two significant issues. The first concerns the handling of inter-categorical ties—those linking core and periphery actors. The second problem is the model's definition of the ideal core as a complete block or clique, which can be overly stringent in practical applications. Building on advancements in direct blockmodeling, we propose modifications to address these shortcomings. To better handle inter-categorical ties, we replace the traditional cell-wise correlation approach with one based on exact- and minimum-density blocks. To relax the constraint of a fully connected core, we introduce the p-core, a proportional adaptation of the k-core/k-plex cohesive subgroups, providing greater flexibility in defining the level of cohesion required for core membership. We illustrate the advantages of these enhancements using both classic network examples and synthetic networks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48353,"journal":{"name":"Social Networks","volume":"81 ","pages":"Pages 31-51"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revising the Borgatti-Everett core-periphery model: Inter-categorical density blocks and partially connected cores\",\"authors\":\"José Luis Estévez ,&nbsp;Carl Nordlund\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socnet.2024.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Borgatti and Everett's model (2000) remains the prevailing standard for identifying categorical core-periphery structures in empirical networks, yet this method poses two significant issues. The first concerns the handling of inter-categorical ties—those linking core and periphery actors. The second problem is the model's definition of the ideal core as a complete block or clique, which can be overly stringent in practical applications. Building on advancements in direct blockmodeling, we propose modifications to address these shortcomings. To better handle inter-categorical ties, we replace the traditional cell-wise correlation approach with one based on exact- and minimum-density blocks. To relax the constraint of a fully connected core, we introduce the p-core, a proportional adaptation of the k-core/k-plex cohesive subgroups, providing greater flexibility in defining the level of cohesion required for core membership. We illustrate the advantages of these enhancements using both classic network examples and synthetic networks.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Networks\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 31-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873324000704\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873324000704","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Borgatti和Everett的模型(2000)仍然是识别经验网络中分类核心-外围结构的主流标准,但这种方法存在两个重大问题。第一个问题涉及处理类别间联系——那些连接核心和外围行为者的联系。第二个问题是该模型将理想核心定义为一个完整的区块或集团,这在实际应用中可能过于严格。基于直接块建模的进步,我们提出了一些修改来解决这些缺点。为了更好地处理分类间的联系,我们用基于精确和最小密度块的方法取代了传统的细胞相关方法。为了放松完全连接核心的约束,我们引入了p-核心,这是k-核心/k-plex内聚子群的比例适应,在定义核心成员所需的内聚水平方面提供了更大的灵活性。我们使用经典网络示例和合成网络来说明这些增强的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revising the Borgatti-Everett core-periphery model: Inter-categorical density blocks and partially connected cores
Borgatti and Everett's model (2000) remains the prevailing standard for identifying categorical core-periphery structures in empirical networks, yet this method poses two significant issues. The first concerns the handling of inter-categorical ties—those linking core and periphery actors. The second problem is the model's definition of the ideal core as a complete block or clique, which can be overly stringent in practical applications. Building on advancements in direct blockmodeling, we propose modifications to address these shortcomings. To better handle inter-categorical ties, we replace the traditional cell-wise correlation approach with one based on exact- and minimum-density blocks. To relax the constraint of a fully connected core, we introduce the p-core, a proportional adaptation of the k-core/k-plex cohesive subgroups, providing greater flexibility in defining the level of cohesion required for core membership. We illustrate the advantages of these enhancements using both classic network examples and synthetic networks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Networks
Social Networks Multiple-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Social Networks is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly. It provides a common forum for representatives of anthropology, sociology, history, social psychology, political science, human geography, biology, economics, communications science and other disciplines who share an interest in the study of the empirical structure of social relations and associations that may be expressed in network form. It publishes both theoretical and substantive papers. Critical reviews of major theoretical or methodological approaches using the notion of networks in the analysis of social behaviour are also included, as are reviews of recent books dealing with social networks and social structure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信