腹主动脉切开手术麻醉

IF 0.3 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Alastair Duncan, Adam Conrad Pichel
{"title":"腹主动脉切开手术麻醉","authors":"Alastair Duncan,&nbsp;Adam Conrad Pichel","doi":"10.1016/j.mpaic.2024.11.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has declined in recent years and according to the annual National Vascular Registry reports (2019–23) the number of patients undergoing aneurysm repair has been steadily decreasing over the last 5 years. The UK has worked tirelessly to reduce its operative mortality rates for elective open AAA repair with the introduction of a quality improvement pro-gramme. Reducing death from ruptured aortic aneurysm has been the focus of the national screening programme. The short-term benefits of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) when compared to open repair are well described, however, the long-term survival benefits, freedom form re-intervention and cost effectiveness of EVAR have been demonstrated to be dominated by open surgery. That is that people with intact AAA should be offered open surgery if medically suitable. The choice of technique for emergency AAA repair is less contentious, with the more traditional approach of open repair being rapidly overtaken by endovascular options in those who are anatomically suitable for EVAR. Technical analysis by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has consistently reported favourable outcomes with EVAR in the emergency setting and that it is a cost-effective treatment. In this article we provide an overview of the evidence supporting the different treatment options, outline current approaches to risk stratification, describe the key physiological changes that occur during open repair and describe an overview of the approach to perioperative management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45856,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"Pages 95-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anaesthesia for open abdominal aortic surgery\",\"authors\":\"Alastair Duncan,&nbsp;Adam Conrad Pichel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mpaic.2024.11.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has declined in recent years and according to the annual National Vascular Registry reports (2019–23) the number of patients undergoing aneurysm repair has been steadily decreasing over the last 5 years. The UK has worked tirelessly to reduce its operative mortality rates for elective open AAA repair with the introduction of a quality improvement pro-gramme. Reducing death from ruptured aortic aneurysm has been the focus of the national screening programme. The short-term benefits of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) when compared to open repair are well described, however, the long-term survival benefits, freedom form re-intervention and cost effectiveness of EVAR have been demonstrated to be dominated by open surgery. That is that people with intact AAA should be offered open surgery if medically suitable. The choice of technique for emergency AAA repair is less contentious, with the more traditional approach of open repair being rapidly overtaken by endovascular options in those who are anatomically suitable for EVAR. Technical analysis by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has consistently reported favourable outcomes with EVAR in the emergency setting and that it is a cost-effective treatment. In this article we provide an overview of the evidence supporting the different treatment options, outline current approaches to risk stratification, describe the key physiological changes that occur during open repair and describe an overview of the approach to perioperative management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 95-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472029924002480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472029924002480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的患病率有所下降,根据年度国家血管登记报告(2019-23),在过去5年里,接受动脉瘤修复的患者数量一直在稳步下降。英国一直在不懈努力,通过引入质量改进方案来降低选择性开放式AAA修补术的手术死亡率。减少主动脉瘤破裂造成的死亡一直是国家筛查方案的重点。与开放式修复相比,血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)的短期益处已被很好地描述,然而,EVAR的长期生存益处、免于再干预和成本效益已被证明以开放式手术为主。也就是说,如果医学上合适,AAA完好的人应该接受开放手术。急诊AAA修复技术的选择争议较少,在解剖上适合EVAR的患者中,更传统的开放修复方法正迅速被血管内修复方法所取代。国家卫生和保健卓越研究所的技术分析一致报告了在紧急情况下EVAR的有利结果,并且这是一种具有成本效益的治疗方法。在本文中,我们概述了支持不同治疗方案的证据,概述了目前的风险分层方法,描述了开放修复过程中发生的关键生理变化,并概述了围手术期管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anaesthesia for open abdominal aortic surgery
The prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has declined in recent years and according to the annual National Vascular Registry reports (2019–23) the number of patients undergoing aneurysm repair has been steadily decreasing over the last 5 years. The UK has worked tirelessly to reduce its operative mortality rates for elective open AAA repair with the introduction of a quality improvement pro-gramme. Reducing death from ruptured aortic aneurysm has been the focus of the national screening programme. The short-term benefits of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) when compared to open repair are well described, however, the long-term survival benefits, freedom form re-intervention and cost effectiveness of EVAR have been demonstrated to be dominated by open surgery. That is that people with intact AAA should be offered open surgery if medically suitable. The choice of technique for emergency AAA repair is less contentious, with the more traditional approach of open repair being rapidly overtaken by endovascular options in those who are anatomically suitable for EVAR. Technical analysis by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has consistently reported favourable outcomes with EVAR in the emergency setting and that it is a cost-effective treatment. In this article we provide an overview of the evidence supporting the different treatment options, outline current approaches to risk stratification, describe the key physiological changes that occur during open repair and describe an overview of the approach to perioperative management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
152
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, an invaluable source of up-to-date information, with the curriculum of both the Primary and Final FRCA examinations covered over a three-year cycle. Published monthly this ever-updating text book will be an invaluable source for both trainee and experienced anaesthetists. The enthusiastic editorial board, under the guidance of two eminent and experienced series editors, ensures Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine covers all the key topics in a comprehensive and authoritative manner. Articles now include learning objectives and eash issue features MCQs, facilitating self-directed learning and enabling readers at all levels to test their knowledge. Each issue is divided between basic scientific and clinical sections. The basic science articles include anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, physics and clinical measurement, while the clinical sections cover anaesthetic agents and techniques, assessment and perioperative management. Further sections cover audit, trials, statistics, ethical and legal medicine, and the management of acute and chronic pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信