Qiyuan Liu , Jiawei Zhang , Jingwei Ge , Cheng Chang , Zhiheng Li , Shen Li , Li Li
{"title":"将时空风险图与候选轨迹树相结合,实现可解释的自动驾驶规划","authors":"Qiyuan Liu , Jiawei Zhang , Jingwei Ge , Cheng Chang , Zhiheng Li , Shen Li , Li Li","doi":"10.1016/j.commtr.2025.100161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With increasing public concern about autonomous vehicles, there is a growing demand for developing explainable autonomous driving planning technology. Traditional risk field methods use handcrafted potential field models to explain driving risks in a scenario. When explaining highly interactive scenarios, such prior knowledge-based methods still lack flexibility, leading to insufficient interpretability. In this study, we first propose the concept of a risk map that can be seen as a discrete, ego vehicle's view form of the risk field. We then design an explainable trajectory planning framework that integrates risk maps with the candidate trajectory tree generated by trajectory prediction models. We further filter safe candidate trajectories from the tree on the basis of their cumulative risks in the risk maps and then select the optimal trajectory to execute by balancing other driving objectives. The validation results in various real-world scenarios demonstrate that our method can generate understandable risk maps and explain the risk differences between trajectories. Open-loop experiments show our model's advantages in terms of safety and efficiency for the trajectory planning task. An analysis of runtime demonstrated its potential for real-world applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100292,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Transportation Research","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100161"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating spatial-temporal risk maps with candidate trajectory trees for explainable autonomous driving planning\",\"authors\":\"Qiyuan Liu , Jiawei Zhang , Jingwei Ge , Cheng Chang , Zhiheng Li , Shen Li , Li Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.commtr.2025.100161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With increasing public concern about autonomous vehicles, there is a growing demand for developing explainable autonomous driving planning technology. Traditional risk field methods use handcrafted potential field models to explain driving risks in a scenario. When explaining highly interactive scenarios, such prior knowledge-based methods still lack flexibility, leading to insufficient interpretability. In this study, we first propose the concept of a risk map that can be seen as a discrete, ego vehicle's view form of the risk field. We then design an explainable trajectory planning framework that integrates risk maps with the candidate trajectory tree generated by trajectory prediction models. We further filter safe candidate trajectories from the tree on the basis of their cumulative risks in the risk maps and then select the optimal trajectory to execute by balancing other driving objectives. The validation results in various real-world scenarios demonstrate that our method can generate understandable risk maps and explain the risk differences between trajectories. Open-loop experiments show our model's advantages in terms of safety and efficiency for the trajectory planning task. An analysis of runtime demonstrated its potential for real-world applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications in Transportation Research\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications in Transportation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772424725000010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Transportation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772424725000010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Integrating spatial-temporal risk maps with candidate trajectory trees for explainable autonomous driving planning
With increasing public concern about autonomous vehicles, there is a growing demand for developing explainable autonomous driving planning technology. Traditional risk field methods use handcrafted potential field models to explain driving risks in a scenario. When explaining highly interactive scenarios, such prior knowledge-based methods still lack flexibility, leading to insufficient interpretability. In this study, we first propose the concept of a risk map that can be seen as a discrete, ego vehicle's view form of the risk field. We then design an explainable trajectory planning framework that integrates risk maps with the candidate trajectory tree generated by trajectory prediction models. We further filter safe candidate trajectories from the tree on the basis of their cumulative risks in the risk maps and then select the optimal trajectory to execute by balancing other driving objectives. The validation results in various real-world scenarios demonstrate that our method can generate understandable risk maps and explain the risk differences between trajectories. Open-loop experiments show our model's advantages in terms of safety and efficiency for the trajectory planning task. An analysis of runtime demonstrated its potential for real-world applications.