将时空风险图与候选轨迹树相结合,实现可解释的自动驾驶规划

IF 12.5 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Qiyuan Liu , Jiawei Zhang , Jingwei Ge , Cheng Chang , Zhiheng Li , Shen Li , Li Li
{"title":"将时空风险图与候选轨迹树相结合,实现可解释的自动驾驶规划","authors":"Qiyuan Liu ,&nbsp;Jiawei Zhang ,&nbsp;Jingwei Ge ,&nbsp;Cheng Chang ,&nbsp;Zhiheng Li ,&nbsp;Shen Li ,&nbsp;Li Li","doi":"10.1016/j.commtr.2025.100161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With increasing public concern about autonomous vehicles, there is a growing demand for developing explainable autonomous driving planning technology. Traditional risk field methods use handcrafted potential field models to explain driving risks in a scenario. When explaining highly interactive scenarios, such prior knowledge-based methods still lack flexibility, leading to insufficient interpretability. In this study, we first propose the concept of a risk map that can be seen as a discrete, ego vehicle's view form of the risk field. We then design an explainable trajectory planning framework that integrates risk maps with the candidate trajectory tree generated by trajectory prediction models. We further filter safe candidate trajectories from the tree on the basis of their cumulative risks in the risk maps and then select the optimal trajectory to execute by balancing other driving objectives. The validation results in various real-world scenarios demonstrate that our method can generate understandable risk maps and explain the risk differences between trajectories. Open-loop experiments show our model's advantages in terms of safety and efficiency for the trajectory planning task. An analysis of runtime demonstrated its potential for real-world applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100292,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Transportation Research","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100161"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating spatial-temporal risk maps with candidate trajectory trees for explainable autonomous driving planning\",\"authors\":\"Qiyuan Liu ,&nbsp;Jiawei Zhang ,&nbsp;Jingwei Ge ,&nbsp;Cheng Chang ,&nbsp;Zhiheng Li ,&nbsp;Shen Li ,&nbsp;Li Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.commtr.2025.100161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With increasing public concern about autonomous vehicles, there is a growing demand for developing explainable autonomous driving planning technology. Traditional risk field methods use handcrafted potential field models to explain driving risks in a scenario. When explaining highly interactive scenarios, such prior knowledge-based methods still lack flexibility, leading to insufficient interpretability. In this study, we first propose the concept of a risk map that can be seen as a discrete, ego vehicle's view form of the risk field. We then design an explainable trajectory planning framework that integrates risk maps with the candidate trajectory tree generated by trajectory prediction models. We further filter safe candidate trajectories from the tree on the basis of their cumulative risks in the risk maps and then select the optimal trajectory to execute by balancing other driving objectives. The validation results in various real-world scenarios demonstrate that our method can generate understandable risk maps and explain the risk differences between trajectories. Open-loop experiments show our model's advantages in terms of safety and efficiency for the trajectory planning task. An analysis of runtime demonstrated its potential for real-world applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications in Transportation Research\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications in Transportation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772424725000010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Transportation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772424725000010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着公众对自动驾驶汽车的关注日益增加,开发可解释的自动驾驶规划技术的需求日益增长。传统的风险场方法使用手工制作的势场模型来解释场景中的驱动风险。在解释高度交互的场景时,这种基于知识的先验方法仍然缺乏灵活性,导致可解释性不足。在这项研究中,我们首先提出了风险图的概念,它可以被看作是风险场的离散的、自我载体的视图形式。然后,我们设计了一个可解释的轨迹规划框架,该框架将风险图与由轨迹预测模型生成的候选轨迹树相结合。我们进一步根据风险图中的累积风险从树中筛选安全候选轨迹,然后通过平衡其他驱动目标来选择执行的最佳轨迹。在各种现实场景中的验证结果表明,我们的方法可以生成可理解的风险图,并解释轨迹之间的风险差异。开环实验表明,该模型在求解轨迹规划任务的安全性和效率方面具有优势。对运行时的分析展示了它在实际应用程序中的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating spatial-temporal risk maps with candidate trajectory trees for explainable autonomous driving planning
With increasing public concern about autonomous vehicles, there is a growing demand for developing explainable autonomous driving planning technology. Traditional risk field methods use handcrafted potential field models to explain driving risks in a scenario. When explaining highly interactive scenarios, such prior knowledge-based methods still lack flexibility, leading to insufficient interpretability. In this study, we first propose the concept of a risk map that can be seen as a discrete, ego vehicle's view form of the risk field. We then design an explainable trajectory planning framework that integrates risk maps with the candidate trajectory tree generated by trajectory prediction models. We further filter safe candidate trajectories from the tree on the basis of their cumulative risks in the risk maps and then select the optimal trajectory to execute by balancing other driving objectives. The validation results in various real-world scenarios demonstrate that our method can generate understandable risk maps and explain the risk differences between trajectories. Open-loop experiments show our model's advantages in terms of safety and efficiency for the trajectory planning task. An analysis of runtime demonstrated its potential for real-world applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信