直肠癌联合质子泵抑制剂和卡培他滨放化疗:来自PRODIGE 23试验的辅助研究

M. Bridoux , E. Aymes , T. Conroy , S. Gourgou , A. Carnot , C. Borg , M.-C. Le Deley , A. Turpin
{"title":"直肠癌联合质子泵抑制剂和卡培他滨放化疗:来自PRODIGE 23试验的辅助研究","authors":"M. Bridoux ,&nbsp;E. Aymes ,&nbsp;T. Conroy ,&nbsp;S. Gourgou ,&nbsp;A. Carnot ,&nbsp;C. Borg ,&nbsp;M.-C. Le Deley ,&nbsp;A. Turpin","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2024.100119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Approximately one in five cancer patients use proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). In this work, we studied the effect of PPI co-medication during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) based on the phase III PRODIGE 23 trial.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We gathered data on PPI exposure for patients from the PRODIGE 23 trial. PPI exposure was defined as PPI use during capecitabine treatment, either during CRT or as adjuvant therapy. The oncological outcomes included recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of metastatic recurrence, and pathological response to preoperative treatment. The association of PPI use with RFS, metastatic recurrence, and histological complete response was evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed data from 332 patients [165 in the NAC group with mFOLFIRINOX, capecitabine-based (CAP50) CRT, and surgery, and 167 in the standard-of-care control arm with CAP50 CRT and surgery]. Thirty-eight patients were co-administered a PPI during capecitabine administration. After a median follow-up of 49.4 months, the 3-year RFS rates were 74.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 68.6% to 78.8%] and 68.4% (95% CI 51.2% to 80.7%) in the non-PPI and PPI groups, respectively, with no significant differences (<em>P</em> = 0.16). The 3-year OS rates were 91.2% (95% CI 87.2% to 93.9%) and 83% (95% CI 65.7% to 92%) in the non-PPI group and PPI groups, respectively, with no significant differences (<em>P</em> = 0.38). We observed no difference in the pathological complete response rate between both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We observed no significant association between PPI exposure and survival or pathological response of patients receiving capecitabine-based CRT for LARC, supporting earlier research findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concomitant proton pump inhibitors and capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: an ancillary study from the PRODIGE 23 trial\",\"authors\":\"M. Bridoux ,&nbsp;E. Aymes ,&nbsp;T. Conroy ,&nbsp;S. Gourgou ,&nbsp;A. Carnot ,&nbsp;C. Borg ,&nbsp;M.-C. Le Deley ,&nbsp;A. Turpin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esmogo.2024.100119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Approximately one in five cancer patients use proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). In this work, we studied the effect of PPI co-medication during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) based on the phase III PRODIGE 23 trial.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We gathered data on PPI exposure for patients from the PRODIGE 23 trial. PPI exposure was defined as PPI use during capecitabine treatment, either during CRT or as adjuvant therapy. The oncological outcomes included recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of metastatic recurrence, and pathological response to preoperative treatment. The association of PPI use with RFS, metastatic recurrence, and histological complete response was evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed data from 332 patients [165 in the NAC group with mFOLFIRINOX, capecitabine-based (CAP50) CRT, and surgery, and 167 in the standard-of-care control arm with CAP50 CRT and surgery]. Thirty-eight patients were co-administered a PPI during capecitabine administration. After a median follow-up of 49.4 months, the 3-year RFS rates were 74.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 68.6% to 78.8%] and 68.4% (95% CI 51.2% to 80.7%) in the non-PPI and PPI groups, respectively, with no significant differences (<em>P</em> = 0.16). The 3-year OS rates were 91.2% (95% CI 87.2% to 93.9%) and 83% (95% CI 65.7% to 92%) in the non-PPI group and PPI groups, respectively, with no significant differences (<em>P</em> = 0.38). We observed no difference in the pathological complete response rate between both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We observed no significant association between PPI exposure and survival or pathological response of patients receiving capecitabine-based CRT for LARC, supporting earlier research findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000803\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大约五分之一的癌症患者使用质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)。在这项工作中,我们基于III期PRODIGE 23试验研究了局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)新辅助放化疗(NCRT)期间PPI联合用药的效果。材料和方法我们从PRODIGE 23试验中收集了患者PPI暴露的数据。PPI暴露被定义为在卡培他滨治疗期间使用PPI,无论是在CRT期间还是作为辅助治疗。肿瘤预后包括无复发生存期(RFS)、总生存期(OS)、累积转移性复发发生率和术前治疗的病理反应。使用单变量和多变量Cox模型评估PPI使用与RFS、转移性复发和组织学完全缓解的关系。结果:我们分析了332例患者的数据[165例在NAC组,采用mFOLFIRINOX、卡培他滨(CAP50) CRT和手术,167例在标准护理对照组,采用CAP50 CRT和手术]。38例患者在卡培他滨给药期间联合给予PPI。中位随访49.4个月后,非PPI组和PPI组的3年RFS率分别为74.1%[95%可信区间(CI) 68.6% ~ 78.8%]和68.4% (95% CI 51.2% ~ 80.7%),差异无统计学意义(P = 0.16)。非PPI组和PPI组的3年OS分别为91.2% (95% CI 87.2% ~ 93.9%)和83% (95% CI 65.7% ~ 92%),差异无统计学意义(P = 0.38)。我们观察到两组的病理完全缓解率无差异。结论:我们观察到PPI暴露与接受卡培他滨为基础的CRT治疗LARC患者的生存或病理反应之间无显著相关性,支持早期研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concomitant proton pump inhibitors and capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: an ancillary study from the PRODIGE 23 trial

Background

Approximately one in five cancer patients use proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). In this work, we studied the effect of PPI co-medication during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) based on the phase III PRODIGE 23 trial.

Materials and methods

We gathered data on PPI exposure for patients from the PRODIGE 23 trial. PPI exposure was defined as PPI use during capecitabine treatment, either during CRT or as adjuvant therapy. The oncological outcomes included recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of metastatic recurrence, and pathological response to preoperative treatment. The association of PPI use with RFS, metastatic recurrence, and histological complete response was evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox models.

Results

We analyzed data from 332 patients [165 in the NAC group with mFOLFIRINOX, capecitabine-based (CAP50) CRT, and surgery, and 167 in the standard-of-care control arm with CAP50 CRT and surgery]. Thirty-eight patients were co-administered a PPI during capecitabine administration. After a median follow-up of 49.4 months, the 3-year RFS rates were 74.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 68.6% to 78.8%] and 68.4% (95% CI 51.2% to 80.7%) in the non-PPI and PPI groups, respectively, with no significant differences (P = 0.16). The 3-year OS rates were 91.2% (95% CI 87.2% to 93.9%) and 83% (95% CI 65.7% to 92%) in the non-PPI group and PPI groups, respectively, with no significant differences (P = 0.38). We observed no difference in the pathological complete response rate between both groups.

Conclusions

We observed no significant association between PPI exposure and survival or pathological response of patients receiving capecitabine-based CRT for LARC, supporting earlier research findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信