免疫化疗时代胆道肿瘤的维持化疗

A. Lamarca , J. Adeva , I. Ales Díaz , R. Alvarez Gallego , A.J. Muñoz Martín , T. Macarulla Mercade
{"title":"免疫化疗时代胆道肿瘤的维持化疗","authors":"A. Lamarca ,&nbsp;J. Adeva ,&nbsp;I. Ales Díaz ,&nbsp;R. Alvarez Gallego ,&nbsp;A.J. Muñoz Martín ,&nbsp;T. Macarulla Mercade","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2024.100116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biliary tract tumours (BTCs) are malignancies with a poor prognosis. Regarding first-line therapy options, cisplatin and gemcitabine (CisGem) alone has been the standard therapy option for more than a decade. This has changed recently, due to the incorporation of immunotherapy into this combo, with latest studies showing how the addition of immunotherapy with either durvalumab or pembrolizumab can improve patients’ outcomes. However, the adequate duration of CisGem in advanced BTCs has remained an open debate. We provide a detailed summary and discussion on current evidence in terms of adequate duration of chemotherapy in the immuno-chemotherapy era, with the aim of informing best practice. Based on the data available and summarised here, the differences are small and individual decisions should be pursued for the sake of not compromising the bone marrow reserve for delivering second-line therapies. In the era of immuno-chemotherapy, maintenance chemotherapy seems to be of very limited benefit and maintenance with the checkpoint inhibitors being utilised seems sufficient. For patients being treated with chemotherapy alone, maintenance chemotherapy should also be carefully considered and decisions individualised.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maintenance chemotherapy in biliary tract tumours in the era of immuno-chemotherapy\",\"authors\":\"A. Lamarca ,&nbsp;J. Adeva ,&nbsp;I. Ales Díaz ,&nbsp;R. Alvarez Gallego ,&nbsp;A.J. Muñoz Martín ,&nbsp;T. Macarulla Mercade\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esmogo.2024.100116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Biliary tract tumours (BTCs) are malignancies with a poor prognosis. Regarding first-line therapy options, cisplatin and gemcitabine (CisGem) alone has been the standard therapy option for more than a decade. This has changed recently, due to the incorporation of immunotherapy into this combo, with latest studies showing how the addition of immunotherapy with either durvalumab or pembrolizumab can improve patients’ outcomes. However, the adequate duration of CisGem in advanced BTCs has remained an open debate. We provide a detailed summary and discussion on current evidence in terms of adequate duration of chemotherapy in the immuno-chemotherapy era, with the aim of informing best practice. Based on the data available and summarised here, the differences are small and individual decisions should be pursued for the sake of not compromising the bone marrow reserve for delivering second-line therapies. In the era of immuno-chemotherapy, maintenance chemotherapy seems to be of very limited benefit and maintenance with the checkpoint inhibitors being utilised seems sufficient. For patients being treated with chemotherapy alone, maintenance chemotherapy should also be carefully considered and decisions individualised.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000773\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胆道肿瘤(btc)是一种预后不良的恶性肿瘤。关于一线治疗方案,顺铂加吉西他滨(CisGem)作为标准治疗方案已有十多年的历史。最近,由于将免疫治疗纳入这一组合,这种情况发生了变化,最新的研究表明,在durvalumab或pembrolizumab的免疫治疗中添加免疫治疗如何改善患者的预后。然而,CisGem在晚期btc中的适当持续时间仍然是一个公开的争论。我们提供了一个详细的总结和讨论在免疫化疗时代的适当的化疗时间方面的现有证据,以告知最佳实践的目的。根据现有数据和本文总结,差异很小,为了不损害骨髓储备以提供二线治疗,应遵循个人决定。在免疫化疗时代,维持化疗的益处似乎非常有限,使用检查点抑制剂维持似乎足够了。对于单独接受化疗的患者,也应仔细考虑维持化疗,并根据个人情况作出决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maintenance chemotherapy in biliary tract tumours in the era of immuno-chemotherapy
Biliary tract tumours (BTCs) are malignancies with a poor prognosis. Regarding first-line therapy options, cisplatin and gemcitabine (CisGem) alone has been the standard therapy option for more than a decade. This has changed recently, due to the incorporation of immunotherapy into this combo, with latest studies showing how the addition of immunotherapy with either durvalumab or pembrolizumab can improve patients’ outcomes. However, the adequate duration of CisGem in advanced BTCs has remained an open debate. We provide a detailed summary and discussion on current evidence in terms of adequate duration of chemotherapy in the immuno-chemotherapy era, with the aim of informing best practice. Based on the data available and summarised here, the differences are small and individual decisions should be pursued for the sake of not compromising the bone marrow reserve for delivering second-line therapies. In the era of immuno-chemotherapy, maintenance chemotherapy seems to be of very limited benefit and maintenance with the checkpoint inhibitors being utilised seems sufficient. For patients being treated with chemotherapy alone, maintenance chemotherapy should also be carefully considered and decisions individualised.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信