在斐济的计划搬迁中制定由当地主导的适应框架

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Merewalesi Yee , Annah Piggott-McKellar , Celia McMichael , Karen E McNamara
{"title":"在斐济的计划搬迁中制定由当地主导的适应框架","authors":"Merewalesi Yee ,&nbsp;Annah Piggott-McKellar ,&nbsp;Celia McMichael ,&nbsp;Karen E McNamara","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Locally led adaptation (LLA) is a new paradigm that seeks to ensure that adaptation decision-making is driven by local people affected by climate risks to deliver context-specific and equitable solutions for local communities. LLA proposes a meaningful approach to decision-making about how, when, and where to adapt; however, there are several challenges associated with LLA including complex power dynamics at the local scale. Empirical research is needed to examine how to best utilise and put in practice LLA principles and processes for improved outcomes on-the-ground. This paper reports on findings from research undertaken in Cogea, Fiji, which is a village that planned to relocate following the destructive category 5 Tropical Cyclone (TC) Yasa and associated flooding in December 2020. This paper draws from <em>Talanoa</em> discussions with small groups and individuals and participant observation in December 2021 and January 2023, to contextualise experiences of the planned relocation process in the context of the eight principles of LLA: devolved decision-making, responsiveness to structural inequalities, reliable funding, investment in local capabilities, robust understanding of climate risk, flexible programming, transparency and accountability, and collaborative action and investment. As this paper explores, Cogea’s relocation was aligned, either strongly or partially, to these LLA principles, albeit with the involvement of donor and development partners in decision-making processes. The paper argues that it is not sufficient to devolve adaptation decision-making to the ‘local’ level; LLA requires ‘critical localism’ that is responsive to vernacular understandings of the local, and the agency of and power dynamics between different actors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 104196"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Framing locally led adaptation in a planned relocation in Fiji\",\"authors\":\"Merewalesi Yee ,&nbsp;Annah Piggott-McKellar ,&nbsp;Celia McMichael ,&nbsp;Karen E McNamara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Locally led adaptation (LLA) is a new paradigm that seeks to ensure that adaptation decision-making is driven by local people affected by climate risks to deliver context-specific and equitable solutions for local communities. LLA proposes a meaningful approach to decision-making about how, when, and where to adapt; however, there are several challenges associated with LLA including complex power dynamics at the local scale. Empirical research is needed to examine how to best utilise and put in practice LLA principles and processes for improved outcomes on-the-ground. This paper reports on findings from research undertaken in Cogea, Fiji, which is a village that planned to relocate following the destructive category 5 Tropical Cyclone (TC) Yasa and associated flooding in December 2020. This paper draws from <em>Talanoa</em> discussions with small groups and individuals and participant observation in December 2021 and January 2023, to contextualise experiences of the planned relocation process in the context of the eight principles of LLA: devolved decision-making, responsiveness to structural inequalities, reliable funding, investment in local capabilities, robust understanding of climate risk, flexible programming, transparency and accountability, and collaborative action and investment. As this paper explores, Cogea’s relocation was aligned, either strongly or partially, to these LLA principles, albeit with the involvement of donor and development partners in decision-making processes. The paper argues that it is not sufficient to devolve adaptation decision-making to the ‘local’ level; LLA requires ‘critical localism’ that is responsive to vernacular understandings of the local, and the agency of and power dynamics between different actors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"159 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524002574\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524002574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地方主导的适应(LLA)是一种新的模式,旨在确保由受气候风险影响的当地居民推动适应决策,为当地社区提供因地施义和公平的解决方案。LLA提出了一种有意义的方法来决定如何、何时、何地适应;然而,与LLA相关的一些挑战包括复杂的地方规模的电力动态。需要进行实证研究,以检查如何最好地利用和实践LLA原则和过程,以改善实地结果。本文报告了在斐济Cogea进行的研究结果,Cogea是一个村庄,在2020年12月破坏性的5级热带气旋(TC) Yasa和相关洪水之后计划搬迁。本文借鉴了Talanoa在2021年12月和2023年1月与小团体和个人的讨论以及参与者的观察,在LLA的八项原则的背景下,对计划搬迁过程的经验进行了背景分析:下放决策权、应对结构性不平等、可靠的资金、对地方能力的投资、对气候风险的深刻理解、灵活的规划、透明度和问责制,以及合作行动和投资。正如本文所探讨的那样,尽管在决策过程中有捐助者和发展伙伴的参与,但Cogea的搬迁还是或多或少地与这些LLA原则保持一致。本文认为,将适应决策下放到“地方”层面是不够的;LLA需要“批判性的地方主义”,这是对当地的白话理解的回应,以及不同参与者之间的代理和权力动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Framing locally led adaptation in a planned relocation in Fiji
Locally led adaptation (LLA) is a new paradigm that seeks to ensure that adaptation decision-making is driven by local people affected by climate risks to deliver context-specific and equitable solutions for local communities. LLA proposes a meaningful approach to decision-making about how, when, and where to adapt; however, there are several challenges associated with LLA including complex power dynamics at the local scale. Empirical research is needed to examine how to best utilise and put in practice LLA principles and processes for improved outcomes on-the-ground. This paper reports on findings from research undertaken in Cogea, Fiji, which is a village that planned to relocate following the destructive category 5 Tropical Cyclone (TC) Yasa and associated flooding in December 2020. This paper draws from Talanoa discussions with small groups and individuals and participant observation in December 2021 and January 2023, to contextualise experiences of the planned relocation process in the context of the eight principles of LLA: devolved decision-making, responsiveness to structural inequalities, reliable funding, investment in local capabilities, robust understanding of climate risk, flexible programming, transparency and accountability, and collaborative action and investment. As this paper explores, Cogea’s relocation was aligned, either strongly or partially, to these LLA principles, albeit with the involvement of donor and development partners in decision-making processes. The paper argues that it is not sufficient to devolve adaptation decision-making to the ‘local’ level; LLA requires ‘critical localism’ that is responsive to vernacular understandings of the local, and the agency of and power dynamics between different actors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信