城市周边绿色基础设施的冲突:基于自然的城市解决方案解决的社会问题

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Jeroen Warner , Richard Meissner
{"title":"城市周边绿色基础设施的冲突:基于自然的城市解决方案解决的社会问题","authors":"Jeroen Warner ,&nbsp;Richard Meissner","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Why do green infrastructure interventions rarely meet with broad public enthusiasm despite their fundamental environmental and economic soundness? Illustrated by two periurban cases, from South Africa and the United Kingdom, we argue that unease with green infrastructure runs deeper than “not-in-my-backyardism”, touching on problems with both process and outcome legitimacy in the context of green territorialization. Despite the existence of legislation institutionalising public participation, our findings suggest considerable scope for more inclusive and perhaps less eco-centric practices, and suggest a need for a fundamental dialogue on what is the problem around urban climate adaptation to open political space for dissent and expression of legitimate interests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 104212"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conflicts over periurban green infrastructure: Unresolved social problems with nature-based urban solutions\",\"authors\":\"Jeroen Warner ,&nbsp;Richard Meissner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Why do green infrastructure interventions rarely meet with broad public enthusiasm despite their fundamental environmental and economic soundness? Illustrated by two periurban cases, from South Africa and the United Kingdom, we argue that unease with green infrastructure runs deeper than “not-in-my-backyardism”, touching on problems with both process and outcome legitimacy in the context of green territorialization. Despite the existence of legislation institutionalising public participation, our findings suggest considerable scope for more inclusive and perhaps less eco-centric practices, and suggest a need for a fundamental dialogue on what is the problem around urban climate adaptation to open political space for dissent and expression of legitimate interests.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"159 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525000120\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525000120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为什么尽管绿色基础设施的干预措施在环境和经济方面具有基本的合理性,却很少受到公众的广泛欢迎?通过来自南非和英国的两个城市周边案例,我们认为,对绿色基础设施的不安比“不要在我的后院”更深刻,触及了绿色领土化背景下的过程和结果合法性问题。尽管存在将公众参与制度化的立法,但我们的研究结果表明,更具包容性和可能更少以生态为中心的实践有相当大的空间,并建议需要就城市气候适应的问题进行基本对话,为异议和合法利益的表达开放政治空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conflicts over periurban green infrastructure: Unresolved social problems with nature-based urban solutions
Why do green infrastructure interventions rarely meet with broad public enthusiasm despite their fundamental environmental and economic soundness? Illustrated by two periurban cases, from South Africa and the United Kingdom, we argue that unease with green infrastructure runs deeper than “not-in-my-backyardism”, touching on problems with both process and outcome legitimacy in the context of green territorialization. Despite the existence of legislation institutionalising public participation, our findings suggest considerable scope for more inclusive and perhaps less eco-centric practices, and suggest a need for a fundamental dialogue on what is the problem around urban climate adaptation to open political space for dissent and expression of legitimate interests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信