{"title":"粮食主权的克伦土著方法:制度出现的追踪过程","authors":"Diana Suhardiman , Charlotte Clare , Saw Nay Kaw","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper looks at Karen communities’ Indigenous approach to food sovereignty, embedded in the cultural values based on the notion of reciprocity. It presents the concept of <em>Ma Doh Ma Kha</em> or, you help me I help you, as the cultural continuum which facilitate processes of institutional emergence. Placing food sovereignty within the broader context of Indigenous movements, it focuses on rice banks formation, factors that necessitate its formation, and the shaping of evolutionary pathways that link rice banks with centuries old Karen customary governance system contextualized in the central positioning of collective plots in rotational farming practices. Building on the concept of institutional bricolage and viewing food sovereignty as a dynamic process rather than a set of fixed principles, it illustrates how Karen communities (re)make institutions while responding to various external drivers of change, including the Myanmar Army’s political oppression. Taking the Salween Peace Park, in Karen State, Myanmar, as our case study, we show how Karen life philosophy and cultural values contextualized in rotational farming practices serve as one of the key foundations for shaping of Karen communities’ evolutionary pathways for food sovereignty.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 104214"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Karen indigenous approach to food sovereignty: Tracing processes of institutional emergence\",\"authors\":\"Diana Suhardiman , Charlotte Clare , Saw Nay Kaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper looks at Karen communities’ Indigenous approach to food sovereignty, embedded in the cultural values based on the notion of reciprocity. It presents the concept of <em>Ma Doh Ma Kha</em> or, you help me I help you, as the cultural continuum which facilitate processes of institutional emergence. Placing food sovereignty within the broader context of Indigenous movements, it focuses on rice banks formation, factors that necessitate its formation, and the shaping of evolutionary pathways that link rice banks with centuries old Karen customary governance system contextualized in the central positioning of collective plots in rotational farming practices. Building on the concept of institutional bricolage and viewing food sovereignty as a dynamic process rather than a set of fixed principles, it illustrates how Karen communities (re)make institutions while responding to various external drivers of change, including the Myanmar Army’s political oppression. Taking the Salween Peace Park, in Karen State, Myanmar, as our case study, we show how Karen life philosophy and cultural values contextualized in rotational farming practices serve as one of the key foundations for shaping of Karen communities’ evolutionary pathways for food sovereignty.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"159 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525000144\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525000144","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文着眼于克伦社区对粮食主权的土著方法,它植根于基于互惠概念的文化价值观中。它提出了Ma Doh Ma Kha的概念,或者你帮我我帮你,作为促进制度产生过程的文化统一体。它将粮食主权置于土著运动的更广泛背景下,重点关注水稻库的形成,其形成的必要因素,以及将水稻库与几个世纪以来的克伦族传统治理体系联系起来的进化途径的形成,该体系以轮作耕作的集体土地为中心定位。基于制度拼凑的概念,并将粮食主权视为一个动态过程,而不是一套固定的原则,它说明了克伦社区如何在应对各种外部变革驱动因素(包括缅甸军队的政治压迫)的同时(重新)建立制度。以缅甸克伦邦的萨尔温江和平公园为例,我们展示了在轮作农业实践背景下的克伦人的生活哲学和文化价值观如何成为塑造克伦社区粮食主权进化路径的关键基础之一。
A Karen indigenous approach to food sovereignty: Tracing processes of institutional emergence
This paper looks at Karen communities’ Indigenous approach to food sovereignty, embedded in the cultural values based on the notion of reciprocity. It presents the concept of Ma Doh Ma Kha or, you help me I help you, as the cultural continuum which facilitate processes of institutional emergence. Placing food sovereignty within the broader context of Indigenous movements, it focuses on rice banks formation, factors that necessitate its formation, and the shaping of evolutionary pathways that link rice banks with centuries old Karen customary governance system contextualized in the central positioning of collective plots in rotational farming practices. Building on the concept of institutional bricolage and viewing food sovereignty as a dynamic process rather than a set of fixed principles, it illustrates how Karen communities (re)make institutions while responding to various external drivers of change, including the Myanmar Army’s political oppression. Taking the Salween Peace Park, in Karen State, Myanmar, as our case study, we show how Karen life philosophy and cultural values contextualized in rotational farming practices serve as one of the key foundations for shaping of Karen communities’ evolutionary pathways for food sovereignty.
期刊介绍:
Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.