生产性排斥:波哥大的无障碍不平等和非正规就业

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Daniel Oviedo , Luis A. Guzmán , Nicolás Oviedo-Dávila
{"title":"生产性排斥:波哥大<e:1>的无障碍不平等和非正规就业","authors":"Daniel Oviedo ,&nbsp;Luis A. Guzmán ,&nbsp;Nicolás Oviedo-Dávila","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Public transport provision has historically been biased against less affluent neighbourhoods, making access to jobs more costly and difficult for a substantial segment of the low(er)-income population. Our research explores the distribution of accessibility to formal and informal employment in Bogotá, Colombia. Building on geocoded travel and household characterisation data for the city and potential accessibility metrics, we present evidence of the contribution of public transport to social and spatial inequalities in accessibility for individuals in different spatial, economic, and social categories and the resulting mobility and accessibility inequalities such a distribution entails. Our analysis draws on social and economic inclusion, linking accessibility to and by public transport to the degree to which individuals are included in the safety nets associated with formal employment. We interrogate the effects of the current configuration of Bogotá and its public transport networks on improving accessibility to quality job opportunities, interpreting higher dependency from informal jobs as productive exclusion. Our study combines two perspectives not often combined, identifying variable levels of social and productive inclusion within the population. The findings suggest that progressive investments in bus rapid transit (BRT) and other forms of public transport around high-demand and highly attractive corridors reinforce cycles of segregation and concentration of formal and informal economic activities. We provide empirical evidence that can contribute to design and target policies for low-skilled and low-income workers in the informal economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 104208"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Productive exclusion: Accessibility inequalities and informal employment in Bogotá\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Oviedo ,&nbsp;Luis A. Guzmán ,&nbsp;Nicolás Oviedo-Dávila\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Public transport provision has historically been biased against less affluent neighbourhoods, making access to jobs more costly and difficult for a substantial segment of the low(er)-income population. Our research explores the distribution of accessibility to formal and informal employment in Bogotá, Colombia. Building on geocoded travel and household characterisation data for the city and potential accessibility metrics, we present evidence of the contribution of public transport to social and spatial inequalities in accessibility for individuals in different spatial, economic, and social categories and the resulting mobility and accessibility inequalities such a distribution entails. Our analysis draws on social and economic inclusion, linking accessibility to and by public transport to the degree to which individuals are included in the safety nets associated with formal employment. We interrogate the effects of the current configuration of Bogotá and its public transport networks on improving accessibility to quality job opportunities, interpreting higher dependency from informal jobs as productive exclusion. Our study combines two perspectives not often combined, identifying variable levels of social and productive inclusion within the population. The findings suggest that progressive investments in bus rapid transit (BRT) and other forms of public transport around high-demand and highly attractive corridors reinforce cycles of segregation and concentration of formal and informal economic activities. We provide empirical evidence that can contribute to design and target policies for low-skilled and low-income workers in the informal economy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"159 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525000089\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525000089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公共交通的提供历来对不太富裕的社区有偏见,这使得相当一部分低收入人口获得工作的成本更高,也更困难。我们的研究探讨了哥伦比亚波哥大正式和非正式就业的可及性分布。基于城市的地理编码旅行和家庭特征数据以及潜在的可达性指标,我们提出了公共交通对不同空间、经济和社会类别的个人可达性的社会和空间不平等的贡献,以及由此导致的流动性和可达性不平等。我们的分析以社会和经济包容性为基础,将公共交通的可及性与个人被纳入正规就业相关安全网的程度联系起来。我们考察了波哥大的当前配置及其公共交通网络对改善高质量工作机会的可及性的影响,将对非正式工作的更高依赖解释为生产性排斥。我们的研究结合了两个通常不结合的观点,确定了人口中社会和生产包容的可变水平。研究结果表明,在高需求和高吸引力的走廊周围,对快速公交(BRT)和其他形式的公共交通的逐步投资,加剧了正式和非正式经济活动隔离和集中的循环。我们提供的经验证据有助于设计和制定针对非正规经济中低技能和低收入工人的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Productive exclusion: Accessibility inequalities and informal employment in Bogotá
Public transport provision has historically been biased against less affluent neighbourhoods, making access to jobs more costly and difficult for a substantial segment of the low(er)-income population. Our research explores the distribution of accessibility to formal and informal employment in Bogotá, Colombia. Building on geocoded travel and household characterisation data for the city and potential accessibility metrics, we present evidence of the contribution of public transport to social and spatial inequalities in accessibility for individuals in different spatial, economic, and social categories and the resulting mobility and accessibility inequalities such a distribution entails. Our analysis draws on social and economic inclusion, linking accessibility to and by public transport to the degree to which individuals are included in the safety nets associated with formal employment. We interrogate the effects of the current configuration of Bogotá and its public transport networks on improving accessibility to quality job opportunities, interpreting higher dependency from informal jobs as productive exclusion. Our study combines two perspectives not often combined, identifying variable levels of social and productive inclusion within the population. The findings suggest that progressive investments in bus rapid transit (BRT) and other forms of public transport around high-demand and highly attractive corridors reinforce cycles of segregation and concentration of formal and informal economic activities. We provide empirical evidence that can contribute to design and target policies for low-skilled and low-income workers in the informal economy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信