RAS野生型晚期结直肠癌化疗抗egfr再挑战(A-REPEAT研究):疗效及其与组织和血浆基因分型的相关性

J. Sgouros , A. Eliades , K. Papadopoulou , N. Korfiatis , D. Papamichael , E. Fountzilas , E. Tsolaki , A. Achilleos , K. Tsangaras , C. Loizides , G. Oikonomopoulos , T. Makatsoris , E. Kypri , M. Ioannides , G. Koumbaris , G. Fountzilas , P.C. Patsalis , G. Pentheroudakis
{"title":"RAS野生型晚期结直肠癌化疗抗egfr再挑战(A-REPEAT研究):疗效及其与组织和血浆基因分型的相关性","authors":"J. Sgouros ,&nbsp;A. Eliades ,&nbsp;K. Papadopoulou ,&nbsp;N. Korfiatis ,&nbsp;D. Papamichael ,&nbsp;E. Fountzilas ,&nbsp;E. Tsolaki ,&nbsp;A. Achilleos ,&nbsp;K. Tsangaras ,&nbsp;C. Loizides ,&nbsp;G. Oikonomopoulos ,&nbsp;T. Makatsoris ,&nbsp;E. Kypri ,&nbsp;M. Ioannides ,&nbsp;G. Koumbaris ,&nbsp;G. Fountzilas ,&nbsp;P.C. Patsalis ,&nbsp;G. Pentheroudakis","doi":"10.1016/j.esmogo.2024.100120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Approved treatments for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients pretreated with two lines of therapy are of limited efficacy. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) re-challenge might represent an option in RAS wild-type tumours. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of anti-EGFR re-challenge strategies (panitumumab/chemotherapy).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>RAS wild-type metastatic CRC patients following first-line chemotherapy + anti-EGFR agent and second-line chemotherapy ± anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent were eligible. Panitumumab with irinotecan or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was used. The primary objective was response rate (RR). Secondary objectives were safety, progression-free survival and overall survival. Next-generation sequencing-based genotyping in archived tissue and plasma was carried out to identify prognostic factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study closed prematurely, due to poor accrual, with 23 patients included. Most patients had primary tumours in the left colon/rectum, and the liver was the most common metastatic site. Treatment modifications were required in 74% of patients due to side-effects primarily, neutropenia and acneiform rash. One patient died from hepatic failure. The objective RR in the intention-to-treat population was 13%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 52%. Forty-eight percent of patients tested via liquid biopsy had <em>RAS</em> mutations before re-challenge with panitumumab despite a median interval from previous anti-EGFR therapy of 12 months. Control of disease did not correlate with the results of liquid biopsy. RR and DCR in patients without <em>RAS</em> mutations in liquid biopsies were 18.2% and 54.5%, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Panitumumab/chemotherapy as an anti-EGFR re-challenge strategy had modest activity in our patient cohort.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100490,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-EGFR re-challenge with chemotherapy in RAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer (A-REPEAT study): efficacy and correlations with tissue and plasma genotyping\",\"authors\":\"J. Sgouros ,&nbsp;A. Eliades ,&nbsp;K. Papadopoulou ,&nbsp;N. Korfiatis ,&nbsp;D. Papamichael ,&nbsp;E. Fountzilas ,&nbsp;E. Tsolaki ,&nbsp;A. Achilleos ,&nbsp;K. Tsangaras ,&nbsp;C. Loizides ,&nbsp;G. Oikonomopoulos ,&nbsp;T. Makatsoris ,&nbsp;E. Kypri ,&nbsp;M. Ioannides ,&nbsp;G. Koumbaris ,&nbsp;G. Fountzilas ,&nbsp;P.C. Patsalis ,&nbsp;G. Pentheroudakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esmogo.2024.100120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Approved treatments for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients pretreated with two lines of therapy are of limited efficacy. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) re-challenge might represent an option in RAS wild-type tumours. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of anti-EGFR re-challenge strategies (panitumumab/chemotherapy).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>RAS wild-type metastatic CRC patients following first-line chemotherapy + anti-EGFR agent and second-line chemotherapy ± anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent were eligible. Panitumumab with irinotecan or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was used. The primary objective was response rate (RR). Secondary objectives were safety, progression-free survival and overall survival. Next-generation sequencing-based genotyping in archived tissue and plasma was carried out to identify prognostic factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study closed prematurely, due to poor accrual, with 23 patients included. Most patients had primary tumours in the left colon/rectum, and the liver was the most common metastatic site. Treatment modifications were required in 74% of patients due to side-effects primarily, neutropenia and acneiform rash. One patient died from hepatic failure. The objective RR in the intention-to-treat population was 13%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 52%. Forty-eight percent of patients tested via liquid biopsy had <em>RAS</em> mutations before re-challenge with panitumumab despite a median interval from previous anti-EGFR therapy of 12 months. Control of disease did not correlate with the results of liquid biopsy. RR and DCR in patients without <em>RAS</em> mutations in liquid biopsies were 18.2% and 54.5%, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Panitumumab/chemotherapy as an anti-EGFR re-challenge strategy had modest activity in our patient cohort.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000815\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949819824000815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经批准的两种治疗方法对结直肠癌(CRC)患者的治疗效果有限。抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)再激发可能是RAS野生型肿瘤的一种选择。本研究旨在评估抗egfr再激发策略(帕尼单抗/化疗)的疗效。材料与方法纳入一线化疗+抗egfr和二线化疗+抗血管内皮生长因子治疗的sras野生型转移性结直肠癌患者。使用帕尼珠单抗联合伊立替康或奥沙利铂化疗。主要目标是有效率(RR)。次要目标是安全性、无进展生存期和总生存期。在存档的组织和血浆中进行下一代基于测序的基因分型,以确定预后因素。结果该研究因累积不良而提前结束,纳入了23例患者。大多数患者原发肿瘤在左结肠/直肠,肝脏是最常见的转移部位。由于副作用(主要是中性粒细胞减少和痤疮样皮疹),74%的患者需要修改治疗方案。一名患者死于肝功能衰竭。意向治疗人群的客观RR为13%,疾病控制率(DCR)为52%。尽管先前的抗egfr治疗间隔为12个月,但通过液体活检检测的患者中有48%在再次使用帕尼珠单抗之前发生RAS突变。疾病的控制与液体活检的结果无关。液体活检无RAS突变患者的RR和DCR分别为18.2%和54.5%。结论帕尼珠单抗/化疗作为抗egfr再激发策略在我们的患者队列中具有适度的活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anti-EGFR re-challenge with chemotherapy in RAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer (A-REPEAT study): efficacy and correlations with tissue and plasma genotyping

Background

Approved treatments for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients pretreated with two lines of therapy are of limited efficacy. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) re-challenge might represent an option in RAS wild-type tumours. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of anti-EGFR re-challenge strategies (panitumumab/chemotherapy).

Materials and methods

RAS wild-type metastatic CRC patients following first-line chemotherapy + anti-EGFR agent and second-line chemotherapy ± anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent were eligible. Panitumumab with irinotecan or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was used. The primary objective was response rate (RR). Secondary objectives were safety, progression-free survival and overall survival. Next-generation sequencing-based genotyping in archived tissue and plasma was carried out to identify prognostic factors.

Results

The study closed prematurely, due to poor accrual, with 23 patients included. Most patients had primary tumours in the left colon/rectum, and the liver was the most common metastatic site. Treatment modifications were required in 74% of patients due to side-effects primarily, neutropenia and acneiform rash. One patient died from hepatic failure. The objective RR in the intention-to-treat population was 13%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 52%. Forty-eight percent of patients tested via liquid biopsy had RAS mutations before re-challenge with panitumumab despite a median interval from previous anti-EGFR therapy of 12 months. Control of disease did not correlate with the results of liquid biopsy. RR and DCR in patients without RAS mutations in liquid biopsies were 18.2% and 54.5%, respectively.

Conclusion

Panitumumab/chemotherapy as an anti-EGFR re-challenge strategy had modest activity in our patient cohort.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信