研究曲线平滑技术以增强页岩气产量数据分析

Taha Yehia , Sondos Mostafa , Moamen Gasser , Mostafa M. Abdelhafiz , Nathan Meehan , Omar Mahmoud
{"title":"研究曲线平滑技术以增强页岩气产量数据分析","authors":"Taha Yehia ,&nbsp;Sondos Mostafa ,&nbsp;Moamen Gasser ,&nbsp;Mostafa M. Abdelhafiz ,&nbsp;Nathan Meehan ,&nbsp;Omar Mahmoud","doi":"10.1016/j.jnggs.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evaluating shale gas reservoir economic viability remains challenging due to different factors such as long transient flow period and liquid loading resulting in successful shut-ins. Such factors cause fluctuations in production data, with inherent noise impacting analysis methods like decline curve analysis (DCA). In this research, we investigated data smoothing techniques as an alternative to noise removal methods. By applying these techniques, the essential characteristics of the periodic events and signals are retained while reducing the influence of noise making identifying and analyzing patterns easier. Applying seven smoothing techniques to three shale gas datasets with different noise levels to investigate their performance, then, utilizing the cluster-based local outlier factor (CBLOF) algorithm to remove noise from the production data, then, applying seven different DCA models to the original, smoothed, and processed data with CBLOF, the study found that smoothing the data facilitated the extraction of the well's signals. Different smoothing techniques exhibited varying spike levels. The goodness of fit was superior using LOWESS and Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) methods compared to Binomial Smoothing. Moreover, each smoothing technique yielded variations in prediction using the same DCA model. Applying the DCA models that commonly underestimate the reserve to the smoothed data led to further underestimations; however, the DCA models that commonly reserve overestimating reserves also leaned towards underestimations. The Duong's DCA model achieved the highest correlation coefficient (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>), whereas the Wang's DCA model recorded the lowest. In conclusion, this research highlights the benefits of smoothing shale gas production data for better analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100808,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience","volume":"9 6","pages":"Pages 431-458"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating curve smoothing techniques for enhanced shale gas production data analysis\",\"authors\":\"Taha Yehia ,&nbsp;Sondos Mostafa ,&nbsp;Moamen Gasser ,&nbsp;Mostafa M. Abdelhafiz ,&nbsp;Nathan Meehan ,&nbsp;Omar Mahmoud\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnggs.2024.10.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Evaluating shale gas reservoir economic viability remains challenging due to different factors such as long transient flow period and liquid loading resulting in successful shut-ins. Such factors cause fluctuations in production data, with inherent noise impacting analysis methods like decline curve analysis (DCA). In this research, we investigated data smoothing techniques as an alternative to noise removal methods. By applying these techniques, the essential characteristics of the periodic events and signals are retained while reducing the influence of noise making identifying and analyzing patterns easier. Applying seven smoothing techniques to three shale gas datasets with different noise levels to investigate their performance, then, utilizing the cluster-based local outlier factor (CBLOF) algorithm to remove noise from the production data, then, applying seven different DCA models to the original, smoothed, and processed data with CBLOF, the study found that smoothing the data facilitated the extraction of the well's signals. Different smoothing techniques exhibited varying spike levels. The goodness of fit was superior using LOWESS and Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) methods compared to Binomial Smoothing. Moreover, each smoothing technique yielded variations in prediction using the same DCA model. Applying the DCA models that commonly underestimate the reserve to the smoothed data led to further underestimations; however, the DCA models that commonly reserve overestimating reserves also leaned towards underestimations. The Duong's DCA model achieved the highest correlation coefficient (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup>), whereas the Wang's DCA model recorded the lowest. In conclusion, this research highlights the benefits of smoothing shale gas production data for better analysis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience\",\"volume\":\"9 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 431-458\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468256X2400066X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468256X2400066X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估页岩气储层的经济可行性仍然具有挑战性,因为有许多不同的因素,如长瞬态流动周期和导致成功关井的液体载荷。这些因素造成了生产数据的波动,固有的噪声影响了递减曲线分析(DCA)等分析方法。在这项研究中,我们研究了数据平滑技术作为噪声去除方法的替代方法。通过应用这些技术,保留了周期事件和信号的基本特征,同时减少了噪声的影响,使识别和分析模式更容易。将7种平滑技术应用于3个不同噪声水平的页岩气数据集,考察其性能,然后利用基于聚类的局部离群因子(CBLOF)算法从生产数据中去除噪声,然后将7种不同的DCA模型应用于原始数据,并使用CBLOF进行平滑和处理,研究发现平滑数据有助于提取井信号。不同的平滑技术表现出不同的峰值水平。与二项平滑方法相比,采用LOWESS和快速傅立叶变换(FFT)方法的拟合优度更高。此外,使用相同的DCA模型,每种平滑技术都会产生预测变化。将通常低估储量的DCA模型应用于平滑数据导致进一步低估;然而,通常保留高估储量的DCA模型也倾向于低估储量。Duong的DCA模型获得了最高的相关系数(R2),而Wang的DCA模型记录了最低的相关系数。总之,这项研究强调了平滑页岩气生产数据的好处,以便更好地分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating curve smoothing techniques for enhanced shale gas production data analysis
Evaluating shale gas reservoir economic viability remains challenging due to different factors such as long transient flow period and liquid loading resulting in successful shut-ins. Such factors cause fluctuations in production data, with inherent noise impacting analysis methods like decline curve analysis (DCA). In this research, we investigated data smoothing techniques as an alternative to noise removal methods. By applying these techniques, the essential characteristics of the periodic events and signals are retained while reducing the influence of noise making identifying and analyzing patterns easier. Applying seven smoothing techniques to three shale gas datasets with different noise levels to investigate their performance, then, utilizing the cluster-based local outlier factor (CBLOF) algorithm to remove noise from the production data, then, applying seven different DCA models to the original, smoothed, and processed data with CBLOF, the study found that smoothing the data facilitated the extraction of the well's signals. Different smoothing techniques exhibited varying spike levels. The goodness of fit was superior using LOWESS and Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) methods compared to Binomial Smoothing. Moreover, each smoothing technique yielded variations in prediction using the same DCA model. Applying the DCA models that commonly underestimate the reserve to the smoothed data led to further underestimations; however, the DCA models that commonly reserve overestimating reserves also leaned towards underestimations. The Duong's DCA model achieved the highest correlation coefficient (R2), whereas the Wang's DCA model recorded the lowest. In conclusion, this research highlights the benefits of smoothing shale gas production data for better analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信