令人讨厌的分布式投票的度量扭曲

IF 0.7 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Alexandros A. Voudouris
{"title":"令人讨厌的分布式投票的度量扭曲","authors":"Alexandros A. Voudouris","doi":"10.1016/j.ipl.2025.106559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We consider a distributed voting problem with a set of agents that are partitioned into disjoint groups and a set of <em>obnoxious</em> alternatives. Agents and alternatives are represented by points in a metric space. The goal is to compute the alternative that <em>maximizes</em> the total distance from all agents using a two-step mechanism which, given some information about the distances between agents and alternatives, first chooses a representative alternative for each group of agents, and then declares one of them as the overall winner. Due to the restricted nature of the mechanism and the potentially limited information it has to make its decision, it might not be always possible to choose the optimal alternative. We show tight bounds on the <em>distortion</em> of different mechanisms depending on the amount of the information they have access to; in particular, we study full-information and ordinal mechanisms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56290,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing Letters","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 106559"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metric distortion of obnoxious distributed voting\",\"authors\":\"Alexandros A. Voudouris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ipl.2025.106559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We consider a distributed voting problem with a set of agents that are partitioned into disjoint groups and a set of <em>obnoxious</em> alternatives. Agents and alternatives are represented by points in a metric space. The goal is to compute the alternative that <em>maximizes</em> the total distance from all agents using a two-step mechanism which, given some information about the distances between agents and alternatives, first chooses a representative alternative for each group of agents, and then declares one of them as the overall winner. Due to the restricted nature of the mechanism and the potentially limited information it has to make its decision, it might not be always possible to choose the optimal alternative. We show tight bounds on the <em>distortion</em> of different mechanisms depending on the amount of the information they have access to; in particular, we study full-information and ordinal mechanisms.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Processing Letters\",\"volume\":\"189 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106559\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Processing Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020019025000031\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020019025000031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们考虑一个分布式投票问题,其中一组代理被划分为不相关的组和一组令人讨厌的替代方案。代理和备选方案由度量空间中的点表示。目标是使用两步机制计算与所有代理的总距离最大的替代方案,该机制在给定代理和备选方案之间的距离的一些信息的情况下,首先为每组代理选择一个有代表性的替代方案,然后宣布其中一个作为总赢家。由于机制的有限性和它所拥有的决策信息的潜在有限性,它可能并不总是能够选择最优的替代方案。我们展示了不同机制的扭曲程度的严格界限,这取决于它们所能获得的信息量;特别地,我们研究了全信息和有序机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Metric distortion of obnoxious distributed voting
We consider a distributed voting problem with a set of agents that are partitioned into disjoint groups and a set of obnoxious alternatives. Agents and alternatives are represented by points in a metric space. The goal is to compute the alternative that maximizes the total distance from all agents using a two-step mechanism which, given some information about the distances between agents and alternatives, first chooses a representative alternative for each group of agents, and then declares one of them as the overall winner. Due to the restricted nature of the mechanism and the potentially limited information it has to make its decision, it might not be always possible to choose the optimal alternative. We show tight bounds on the distortion of different mechanisms depending on the amount of the information they have access to; in particular, we study full-information and ordinal mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Processing Letters
Information Processing Letters 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Information Processing Letters invites submission of original research articles that focus on fundamental aspects of information processing and computing. This naturally includes work in the broadly understood field of theoretical computer science; although papers in all areas of scientific inquiry will be given consideration, provided that they describe research contributions credibly motivated by applications to computing and involve rigorous methodology. High quality experimental papers that address topics of sufficiently broad interest may also be considered. Since its inception in 1971, Information Processing Letters has served as a forum for timely dissemination of short, concise and focused research contributions. Continuing with this tradition, and to expedite the reviewing process, manuscripts are generally limited in length to nine pages when they appear in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信