急诊科患者对丁丙诺啡的接受程度及其下降的原因

Lindsey K. Jennings , Allison Smith , Angela Moreland , Ralph Ward , Sarah Gainey , Suzanne Lane , Olivia Holodnik , Katherine Scarpino , Karen Hartwell , Louise Haynes , Kathleen T. Brady , Kelly Barth
{"title":"急诊科患者对丁丙诺啡的接受程度及其下降的原因","authors":"Lindsey K. Jennings ,&nbsp;Allison Smith ,&nbsp;Angela Moreland ,&nbsp;Ralph Ward ,&nbsp;Sarah Gainey ,&nbsp;Suzanne Lane ,&nbsp;Olivia Holodnik ,&nbsp;Katherine Scarpino ,&nbsp;Karen Hartwell ,&nbsp;Louise Haynes ,&nbsp;Kathleen T. Brady ,&nbsp;Kelly Barth","doi":"10.1016/j.jemrpt.2025.100141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) reduces morbidity and mortality for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). Emergency department-initiated buprenorphine (EDIB) doubles retention in treatment at 30 days compared to outpatient referral alone. Little is known about acceptance rates of EDIB and reasons why patients decline this life-saving intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this study was to quantify the number of patients who initiate and decline buprenorphine in the ED and determine reasons for declination.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Seven SC EDs implemented EDIB programs that included ED-based peer recovery specialists (PRSs) to provide a brief intervention and assist with referral to outpatient treatment. The PRSs recorded patient interactions in a database including medical eligibility, if EDIB was provided, and the reason(s) why eligible patients declined EDIB. All eligible EDIB patients were entered in the PRS database and included in the study. Reasons for declining buprenorphine in eligible patients were analyzed with both fixed and free-text response options.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 2205 patients were eligible for EDIB. Of those, 963 (43.6 %) patients accepted buprenorphine and 1242 (56.3 %) declined. The most common reasons for declination were 1) the “patient preferring non-MOUD treatment” (53.4 %), 2) “Not ready/would like to think about it and/or check with other treatment providers or case workers” (16.7 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Over half of patients with OUD who were eligible for EDIB declined treatment, with the most common reason being preference for non-MOUD treatment. Given the success of MOUD for treatment of OUD, this topic requires further exploration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73546,"journal":{"name":"JEM reports","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient acceptance of emergency department-initiated buprenorphine and reasons for declining\",\"authors\":\"Lindsey K. Jennings ,&nbsp;Allison Smith ,&nbsp;Angela Moreland ,&nbsp;Ralph Ward ,&nbsp;Sarah Gainey ,&nbsp;Suzanne Lane ,&nbsp;Olivia Holodnik ,&nbsp;Katherine Scarpino ,&nbsp;Karen Hartwell ,&nbsp;Louise Haynes ,&nbsp;Kathleen T. Brady ,&nbsp;Kelly Barth\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemrpt.2025.100141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) reduces morbidity and mortality for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). Emergency department-initiated buprenorphine (EDIB) doubles retention in treatment at 30 days compared to outpatient referral alone. Little is known about acceptance rates of EDIB and reasons why patients decline this life-saving intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this study was to quantify the number of patients who initiate and decline buprenorphine in the ED and determine reasons for declination.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Seven SC EDs implemented EDIB programs that included ED-based peer recovery specialists (PRSs) to provide a brief intervention and assist with referral to outpatient treatment. The PRSs recorded patient interactions in a database including medical eligibility, if EDIB was provided, and the reason(s) why eligible patients declined EDIB. All eligible EDIB patients were entered in the PRS database and included in the study. Reasons for declining buprenorphine in eligible patients were analyzed with both fixed and free-text response options.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 2205 patients were eligible for EDIB. Of those, 963 (43.6 %) patients accepted buprenorphine and 1242 (56.3 %) declined. The most common reasons for declination were 1) the “patient preferring non-MOUD treatment” (53.4 %), 2) “Not ready/would like to think about it and/or check with other treatment providers or case workers” (16.7 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Over half of patients with OUD who were eligible for EDIB declined treatment, with the most common reason being preference for non-MOUD treatment. Given the success of MOUD for treatment of OUD, this topic requires further exploration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JEM reports\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JEM reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773232025000057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEM reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773232025000057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的药物治疗降低了阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者的发病率和死亡率。急诊启动丁丙诺啡(EDIB)在治疗30天的保留比单独门诊转诊加倍。EDIB的接受率和患者拒绝这种挽救生命的干预措施的原因知之甚少。目的本研究的目的是量化在急诊科使用丁丙诺啡和减少丁丙诺啡的患者数量,并确定减少的原因。方法7个社区教育中心实施了EDIB项目,其中包括以社区教育中心为基础的同伴康复专家(prs)提供简短的干预,并协助转诊到门诊治疗。prs在数据库中记录了患者的互动,包括医疗资格,是否提供了EDIB,以及符合条件的患者拒绝EDIB的原因。所有符合条件的EDIB患者均被录入PRS数据库并纳入研究。对符合条件的患者丁丙诺啡下降的原因进行了固定和自由文本反应选项的分析。结果共有2205例患者符合EDIB治疗条件。其中963例(43.6%)患者接受丁丙诺啡治疗,1242例(56.3%)患者不接受丁丙诺啡治疗。最常见的拒绝原因是1)“病人更喜欢非mod治疗”(53.4%),2)“没有准备好/不愿意考虑和/或与其他治疗提供者或个案工作者核实”(16.7%)。结论符合EDIB条件的OUD患者中有超过一半的患者拒绝了治疗,最常见的原因是偏好非mod治疗。鉴于mod治疗OUD的成功,这一课题需要进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient acceptance of emergency department-initiated buprenorphine and reasons for declining

Background

Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) reduces morbidity and mortality for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). Emergency department-initiated buprenorphine (EDIB) doubles retention in treatment at 30 days compared to outpatient referral alone. Little is known about acceptance rates of EDIB and reasons why patients decline this life-saving intervention.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to quantify the number of patients who initiate and decline buprenorphine in the ED and determine reasons for declination.

Methods

Seven SC EDs implemented EDIB programs that included ED-based peer recovery specialists (PRSs) to provide a brief intervention and assist with referral to outpatient treatment. The PRSs recorded patient interactions in a database including medical eligibility, if EDIB was provided, and the reason(s) why eligible patients declined EDIB. All eligible EDIB patients were entered in the PRS database and included in the study. Reasons for declining buprenorphine in eligible patients were analyzed with both fixed and free-text response options.

Results

A total of 2205 patients were eligible for EDIB. Of those, 963 (43.6 %) patients accepted buprenorphine and 1242 (56.3 %) declined. The most common reasons for declination were 1) the “patient preferring non-MOUD treatment” (53.4 %), 2) “Not ready/would like to think about it and/or check with other treatment providers or case workers” (16.7 %).

Conclusions

Over half of patients with OUD who were eligible for EDIB declined treatment, with the most common reason being preference for non-MOUD treatment. Given the success of MOUD for treatment of OUD, this topic requires further exploration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JEM reports
JEM reports Emergency Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
54 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信