南岛人在印度尼西亚南苏拉威西岛马洛斯-庞格普喀斯特占领的早期证据

IF 0.9 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Suryatman , Andi Muh. Saiful , Nur Ihsan Djindar , Hasanuddin , Iwan Sumantri , Yinika L. Perston , Muh. Alif , Abdullah Abbas , Putra Hudlinas Muhammad , Imran Ilyas , Akin Duli , Adam Brumm
{"title":"南岛人在印度尼西亚南苏拉威西岛马洛斯-庞格普喀斯特占领的早期证据","authors":"Suryatman ,&nbsp;Andi Muh. Saiful ,&nbsp;Nur Ihsan Djindar ,&nbsp;Hasanuddin ,&nbsp;Iwan Sumantri ,&nbsp;Yinika L. Perston ,&nbsp;Muh. Alif ,&nbsp;Abdullah Abbas ,&nbsp;Putra Hudlinas Muhammad ,&nbsp;Imran Ilyas ,&nbsp;Akin Duli ,&nbsp;Adam Brumm","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2025.100601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Archaeological research in the Maros-Pangkep karst area of South Sulawesi, Indonesia, has yielded important insight into the long history of human habitation in this region. A poorly known part of the cultural sequence is the arrival of Austronesian-speaking farming societies during the latter phase of prehistoric occupation, and the nature of Austronesian interactions with the long-established Toalean hunter-forager population. The archaeological evidence for this period is often limited and frequently complicated by taphonomic factors, including extensive post-depositional disturbances and stratigraphic reworking at many sites, making it challenging to gain a deep understanding of the various phases of cave use. In this study, we describe the results of our excavations at a new site in the Maros-Pangkep karsts, Bulu Taroa 2 cave, that has significance for our understanding of the timing and nature of interactions between early Austronesians and Toaleans. Excavations at this site uncovered culturally-rich Austronesian layers dating to around 2600–2490 cal BP, thus coinciding with the late ‘Neolithic’ period in the large-scale open settlement sites in the Karama Valley to the north. The finds recovered from Bulu Taroa 2 suggest that the early Austronesian-speaking inhabitants adapted to the nearby coastal environment by intensively exploiting estuarine shellfish. Signs of cultural interactions with Toaleans are minimal. We surmise from this site that ancient Austronesians used some local caves as burial sites during the Metal phase, resulting in the disturbance of older stratified cultural layers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51847,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Research in Asia","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100601"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early evidence of Austronesian occupation in the Maros-Pangkep karsts of South Sulawesi, Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Suryatman ,&nbsp;Andi Muh. Saiful ,&nbsp;Nur Ihsan Djindar ,&nbsp;Hasanuddin ,&nbsp;Iwan Sumantri ,&nbsp;Yinika L. Perston ,&nbsp;Muh. Alif ,&nbsp;Abdullah Abbas ,&nbsp;Putra Hudlinas Muhammad ,&nbsp;Imran Ilyas ,&nbsp;Akin Duli ,&nbsp;Adam Brumm\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ara.2025.100601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Archaeological research in the Maros-Pangkep karst area of South Sulawesi, Indonesia, has yielded important insight into the long history of human habitation in this region. A poorly known part of the cultural sequence is the arrival of Austronesian-speaking farming societies during the latter phase of prehistoric occupation, and the nature of Austronesian interactions with the long-established Toalean hunter-forager population. The archaeological evidence for this period is often limited and frequently complicated by taphonomic factors, including extensive post-depositional disturbances and stratigraphic reworking at many sites, making it challenging to gain a deep understanding of the various phases of cave use. In this study, we describe the results of our excavations at a new site in the Maros-Pangkep karsts, Bulu Taroa 2 cave, that has significance for our understanding of the timing and nature of interactions between early Austronesians and Toaleans. Excavations at this site uncovered culturally-rich Austronesian layers dating to around 2600–2490 cal BP, thus coinciding with the late ‘Neolithic’ period in the large-scale open settlement sites in the Karama Valley to the north. The finds recovered from Bulu Taroa 2 suggest that the early Austronesian-speaking inhabitants adapted to the nearby coastal environment by intensively exploiting estuarine shellfish. Signs of cultural interactions with Toaleans are minimal. We surmise from this site that ancient Austronesians used some local caves as burial sites during the Metal phase, resulting in the disturbance of older stratified cultural layers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeological Research in Asia\",\"volume\":\"41 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100601\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeological Research in Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235222672500011X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological Research in Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235222672500011X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在印度尼西亚南苏拉威西的马洛斯-庞格普喀斯特地区的考古研究,对该地区人类居住的悠久历史有了重要的认识。文化序列中鲜为人知的一部分是,在史前占领的后期阶段,南岛语农业社会的到来,以及南岛人与长期存在的托亚人狩猎-觅食人口的互动性质。这一时期的考古证据通常是有限的,而且经常受到地层学因素的影响,包括在许多遗址进行的广泛的沉积后扰动和地层改造,这使得对洞穴使用的各个阶段的深入了解具有挑战性。在这项研究中,我们描述了我们在马洛斯-庞格普喀斯特(Maros-Pangkep)喀斯特的一个新遗址,布鲁塔罗亚2洞穴的挖掘结果,这对我们理解早期南岛人和托利亚人之间相互作用的时间和性质具有重要意义。在该遗址的发掘中发现了距今约2600-2490 cal BP的南岛人文化丰富的地层,因此与北部卡拉玛山谷大规模开放定居点的“新石器时代”晚期相吻合。从布鲁塔罗亚2号发现的发现表明,早期说南岛语的居民通过大量开采河口贝类来适应附近的沿海环境。与托利安人文化互动的迹象很少。我们从这个遗址推测,古南岛人在金属期使用了一些当地的洞穴作为埋葬地点,导致旧的分层文化层受到干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early evidence of Austronesian occupation in the Maros-Pangkep karsts of South Sulawesi, Indonesia
Archaeological research in the Maros-Pangkep karst area of South Sulawesi, Indonesia, has yielded important insight into the long history of human habitation in this region. A poorly known part of the cultural sequence is the arrival of Austronesian-speaking farming societies during the latter phase of prehistoric occupation, and the nature of Austronesian interactions with the long-established Toalean hunter-forager population. The archaeological evidence for this period is often limited and frequently complicated by taphonomic factors, including extensive post-depositional disturbances and stratigraphic reworking at many sites, making it challenging to gain a deep understanding of the various phases of cave use. In this study, we describe the results of our excavations at a new site in the Maros-Pangkep karsts, Bulu Taroa 2 cave, that has significance for our understanding of the timing and nature of interactions between early Austronesians and Toaleans. Excavations at this site uncovered culturally-rich Austronesian layers dating to around 2600–2490 cal BP, thus coinciding with the late ‘Neolithic’ period in the large-scale open settlement sites in the Karama Valley to the north. The finds recovered from Bulu Taroa 2 suggest that the early Austronesian-speaking inhabitants adapted to the nearby coastal environment by intensively exploiting estuarine shellfish. Signs of cultural interactions with Toaleans are minimal. We surmise from this site that ancient Austronesians used some local caves as burial sites during the Metal phase, resulting in the disturbance of older stratified cultural layers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Archaeological Research in Asia presents high quality scholarly research conducted in between the Bosporus and the Pacific on a broad range of archaeological subjects of importance to audiences across Asia and around the world. The journal covers the traditional components of archaeology: placing events and patterns in time and space; analysis of past lifeways; and explanations for cultural processes and change. To this end, the publication will highlight theoretical and methodological advances in studying the past, present new data, and detail patterns that reshape our understanding of it. Archaeological Research in Asia publishes work on the full temporal range of archaeological inquiry from the earliest human presence in Asia with a special emphasis on time periods under-represented in other venues. Journal contributions are of three kinds: articles, case reports and short communications. Full length articles should present synthetic treatments, novel analyses, or theoretical approaches to unresolved issues. Case reports present basic data on subjects that are of broad interest because they represent key sites, sequences, and subjects that figure prominently, or should figure prominently, in how scholars both inside and outside Asia understand the archaeology of cultural and biological change through time. Short communications present new findings (e.g., radiocarbon dates) that are important to the extent that they reaffirm or change the way scholars in Asia and around the world think about Asian cultural or biological history.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信