防止以推广为中心的目标:监管重点对负责任的人工智能的影响

Samuel N. Kirshner, Jessica Lawson
{"title":"防止以推广为中心的目标:监管重点对负责任的人工智能的影响","authors":"Samuel N. Kirshner,&nbsp;Jessica Lawson","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Implementing black-box artificial intelligence (AI) often requires evaluating trade-offs related to responsible AI (RAI) (e.g., the trade-off between performance and features regarding AI's fairness or explainability). Synthesizing theories on regulatory focus and cognitive dissonance, we develop and test a model describing how organizational goals impact the dynamics of AI-based unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB). First, we show that promotion-focused goals increase AI-based UPB and that RAI values act as a novel mediator. Promotion-focus goals significantly lower fairness in Study 1A and explainability in Study 1B, mediating the relationship between regulatory focus and AI-based UPB. Study 2A further supports RAI values as the driving mechanism of AI-based UPB using a moderation-by-processes design experiment. Study 2B provides evidence that AI-based UPB decisions can, in turn, lead to more unethical RAI values for promotion-focused firms, creating a negative RAI feedback loop within organizations. Our research provides theoretical implications and actionable insights for researchers, organizations, and policymakers seeking to improve the responsible use of AI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preventing promotion-focused goals: The impact of regulatory focus on responsible AI\",\"authors\":\"Samuel N. Kirshner,&nbsp;Jessica Lawson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Implementing black-box artificial intelligence (AI) often requires evaluating trade-offs related to responsible AI (RAI) (e.g., the trade-off between performance and features regarding AI's fairness or explainability). Synthesizing theories on regulatory focus and cognitive dissonance, we develop and test a model describing how organizational goals impact the dynamics of AI-based unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB). First, we show that promotion-focused goals increase AI-based UPB and that RAI values act as a novel mediator. Promotion-focus goals significantly lower fairness in Study 1A and explainability in Study 1B, mediating the relationship between regulatory focus and AI-based UPB. Study 2A further supports RAI values as the driving mechanism of AI-based UPB using a moderation-by-processes design experiment. Study 2B provides evidence that AI-based UPB decisions can, in turn, lead to more unethical RAI values for promotion-focused firms, creating a negative RAI feedback loop within organizations. Our research provides theoretical implications and actionable insights for researchers, organizations, and policymakers seeking to improve the responsible use of AI.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000720\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实现黑盒人工智能(AI)通常需要评估与负责任的AI (RAI)相关的权衡(例如,关于AI的公平性或可解释性的性能和功能之间的权衡)。综合监管焦点和认知失调理论,我们开发并测试了一个模型,该模型描述了组织目标如何影响基于人工智能的不道德亲组织行为(UPB)的动态。首先,我们发现以晋升为中心的目标增加了基于ai的UPB,并且RAI值作为一个新的中介。在研究1A中,晋升关注目标显著降低了公平性,在研究1B中显著降低了可解释性,中介了监管关注与基于人工智能的UPB之间的关系。研究2A通过过程调节设计实验进一步支持RAI值作为基于ai的UPB的驱动机制。研究2B提供的证据表明,基于人工智能的UPB决策反过来会导致以晋升为重点的公司产生更多不道德的RAI值,从而在组织内产生负面的RAI反馈循环。我们的研究为研究人员、组织和政策制定者寻求改善人工智能的负责任地使用提供了理论意义和可操作的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preventing promotion-focused goals: The impact of regulatory focus on responsible AI
Implementing black-box artificial intelligence (AI) often requires evaluating trade-offs related to responsible AI (RAI) (e.g., the trade-off between performance and features regarding AI's fairness or explainability). Synthesizing theories on regulatory focus and cognitive dissonance, we develop and test a model describing how organizational goals impact the dynamics of AI-based unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB). First, we show that promotion-focused goals increase AI-based UPB and that RAI values act as a novel mediator. Promotion-focus goals significantly lower fairness in Study 1A and explainability in Study 1B, mediating the relationship between regulatory focus and AI-based UPB. Study 2A further supports RAI values as the driving mechanism of AI-based UPB using a moderation-by-processes design experiment. Study 2B provides evidence that AI-based UPB decisions can, in turn, lead to more unethical RAI values for promotion-focused firms, creating a negative RAI feedback loop within organizations. Our research provides theoretical implications and actionable insights for researchers, organizations, and policymakers seeking to improve the responsible use of AI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信