按患者、医师及临床因素比较肥胖内科医师临床实践习惯

Selvi Rajagopal , Edmond P. Wickham III , Tirissa J. Reid , Dana R. Brittan , Judith Korner , Kimberly A. Gudzune
{"title":"按患者、医师及临床因素比较肥胖内科医师临床实践习惯","authors":"Selvi Rajagopal ,&nbsp;Edmond P. Wickham III ,&nbsp;Tirissa J. Reid ,&nbsp;Dana R. Brittan ,&nbsp;Judith Korner ,&nbsp;Kimberly A. Gudzune","doi":"10.1016/j.obpill.2025.100157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While clinical practice habits vary by patient, physician and clinic factors in primary care, limited research has examined whether differences exist in obesity medicine. Our objective was to compare practice habits by such factors among obesity medicine physicians certified by the American Board of Obesity Medicine (ABOM).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted secondary analyses of cross-sectional data from the 2023 ABOM Practice Analysis Validation Survey. We included three obesity medicine practice habits – prescribing anti-obesity medications (AOMs), off-label prescribing of medications for weight reduction, and obesity medicine clinical practice hours (4–20 h/week versus &gt;20 h/week). We included patient (patient population), physician (primary medical specialty, years of obesity medicine experience) and clinic factors (practice setting, geographic catchment, accepts insurance for obesity care). We conducted bivariate analyses using Χ<sup>2</sup> tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 565 ABOM-certified physicians, 71.5 % had primary medical specialties within primary care and 9.2 % predominantly treated children/adolescents with obesity. Overall, 97.5 % prescribed AOMs and 85.1 % prescribed off-label medications for weight reduction. Fewer physicians who predominantly treated children/adolescents prescribed AOMs compared to physicians with no or limited treatment of children (88.5 % versus 98.4 % and 98.5 %, respectively; p &lt; 0.001). Overall, 41.4 % reported practicing obesity medicine &gt;20 h/week, which was more likely to occur as years of obesity medicine experience increased (i.e., 21.9 ​% among physicians with 1–2 years of experience versus 58.5 ​% with 10+ years; p ​&lt; ​0.001). No significant differences in practice habits occurred by primary medical specialty, practice setting, geographic catchment, or accepting insurance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings may suggest that ABOM-certified physicians have consistent obesity medication prescribing practices regardless of physician or clinic factors, which may be particularly important to patients seeking pharmacologic treatment. Most ABOM-certified physicians who predominantly treat children/adolescents prescribe obesity medications. These current rates are relatively higher than prior findings among pediatric ABOM-certified physicians, which might help support pharmacologic access for pediatric patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100977,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Pillars","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing clinical practice habits among obesity medicine physicians by patient, physician and clinic factors\",\"authors\":\"Selvi Rajagopal ,&nbsp;Edmond P. Wickham III ,&nbsp;Tirissa J. Reid ,&nbsp;Dana R. Brittan ,&nbsp;Judith Korner ,&nbsp;Kimberly A. Gudzune\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.obpill.2025.100157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While clinical practice habits vary by patient, physician and clinic factors in primary care, limited research has examined whether differences exist in obesity medicine. Our objective was to compare practice habits by such factors among obesity medicine physicians certified by the American Board of Obesity Medicine (ABOM).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted secondary analyses of cross-sectional data from the 2023 ABOM Practice Analysis Validation Survey. We included three obesity medicine practice habits – prescribing anti-obesity medications (AOMs), off-label prescribing of medications for weight reduction, and obesity medicine clinical practice hours (4–20 h/week versus &gt;20 h/week). We included patient (patient population), physician (primary medical specialty, years of obesity medicine experience) and clinic factors (practice setting, geographic catchment, accepts insurance for obesity care). We conducted bivariate analyses using Χ<sup>2</sup> tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 565 ABOM-certified physicians, 71.5 % had primary medical specialties within primary care and 9.2 % predominantly treated children/adolescents with obesity. Overall, 97.5 % prescribed AOMs and 85.1 % prescribed off-label medications for weight reduction. Fewer physicians who predominantly treated children/adolescents prescribed AOMs compared to physicians with no or limited treatment of children (88.5 % versus 98.4 % and 98.5 %, respectively; p &lt; 0.001). Overall, 41.4 % reported practicing obesity medicine &gt;20 h/week, which was more likely to occur as years of obesity medicine experience increased (i.e., 21.9 ​% among physicians with 1–2 years of experience versus 58.5 ​% with 10+ years; p ​&lt; ​0.001). No significant differences in practice habits occurred by primary medical specialty, practice setting, geographic catchment, or accepting insurance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings may suggest that ABOM-certified physicians have consistent obesity medication prescribing practices regardless of physician or clinic factors, which may be particularly important to patients seeking pharmacologic treatment. Most ABOM-certified physicians who predominantly treat children/adolescents prescribe obesity medications. These current rates are relatively higher than prior findings among pediatric ABOM-certified physicians, which might help support pharmacologic access for pediatric patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Pillars\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Pillars\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667368125000014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Pillars","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667368125000014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然临床实践习惯因患者、医生和初级保健的临床因素而异,但有限的研究调查了肥胖医学中是否存在差异。我们的目的是通过这些因素比较美国肥胖医学委员会(ABOM)认证的肥胖医学医生的实践习惯。方法对2023年ABOM实践分析验证调查的横断面数据进行二次分析。我们纳入了三种肥胖治疗实践习惯——开抗肥胖药物处方(AOMs)、超说明书开减肥药物处方和肥胖治疗临床实践小时数(4-20小时/周vs >;20小时/周)。我们纳入了患者(患者群体)、医生(初级医疗专业、多年的肥胖治疗经验)和临床因素(实践环境、地理集水区、接受肥胖治疗保险)。我们使用Χ2测试进行了双变量分析。结果在565名经bomo认证的医生中,71.5%具有初级医疗专业,9.2%主要治疗肥胖儿童/青少年。总的来说,97.5%的人开了AOMs, 85.1%的人开了标签外药物来减肥。主要治疗儿童/青少年的医生比不治疗儿童或治疗儿童有限的医生少(分别为88.5%对98.4%和98.5%;p & lt;0.001)。总体而言,41.4%的人报告每周治疗肥胖20小时,随着治疗肥胖经验年数的增加,这种情况更有可能发生(即,1-2年经验的医生中21.9%,10年以上的医生中58.5%;p & lt;0.001)。初级医疗专业、执业环境、地理集水区或接受保险等因素对执业习惯的影响均无显著差异。结论:我们的研究结果可能表明,无论医生或临床因素如何,经bomo认证的医生都有一致的肥胖药物处方做法,这对寻求药物治疗的患者尤其重要。大多数经abo认证的医生主要治疗儿童/青少年,他们会开减肥药。这些目前的比率相对高于先前在儿科经abom认证的医生中发现的结果,这可能有助于支持儿科患者获得药物治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing clinical practice habits among obesity medicine physicians by patient, physician and clinic factors

Background

While clinical practice habits vary by patient, physician and clinic factors in primary care, limited research has examined whether differences exist in obesity medicine. Our objective was to compare practice habits by such factors among obesity medicine physicians certified by the American Board of Obesity Medicine (ABOM).

Methods

We conducted secondary analyses of cross-sectional data from the 2023 ABOM Practice Analysis Validation Survey. We included three obesity medicine practice habits – prescribing anti-obesity medications (AOMs), off-label prescribing of medications for weight reduction, and obesity medicine clinical practice hours (4–20 h/week versus >20 h/week). We included patient (patient population), physician (primary medical specialty, years of obesity medicine experience) and clinic factors (practice setting, geographic catchment, accepts insurance for obesity care). We conducted bivariate analyses using Χ2 tests.

Results

Among 565 ABOM-certified physicians, 71.5 % had primary medical specialties within primary care and 9.2 % predominantly treated children/adolescents with obesity. Overall, 97.5 % prescribed AOMs and 85.1 % prescribed off-label medications for weight reduction. Fewer physicians who predominantly treated children/adolescents prescribed AOMs compared to physicians with no or limited treatment of children (88.5 % versus 98.4 % and 98.5 %, respectively; p < 0.001). Overall, 41.4 % reported practicing obesity medicine >20 h/week, which was more likely to occur as years of obesity medicine experience increased (i.e., 21.9 ​% among physicians with 1–2 years of experience versus 58.5 ​% with 10+ years; p ​< ​0.001). No significant differences in practice habits occurred by primary medical specialty, practice setting, geographic catchment, or accepting insurance.

Conclusion

Our findings may suggest that ABOM-certified physicians have consistent obesity medication prescribing practices regardless of physician or clinic factors, which may be particularly important to patients seeking pharmacologic treatment. Most ABOM-certified physicians who predominantly treat children/adolescents prescribe obesity medications. These current rates are relatively higher than prior findings among pediatric ABOM-certified physicians, which might help support pharmacologic access for pediatric patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信