将大脑空白与自发思维的内容和动态联系起来

IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Paradeisios Alexandros Boulakis , Athena Demertzi
{"title":"将大脑空白与自发思维的内容和动态联系起来","authors":"Paradeisios Alexandros Boulakis ,&nbsp;Athena Demertzi","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During wakefulness, the stream of thought is occasionally interrupted by moments when we cannot report any content, termed ‘mind-blanking’ (MB). As MB is a relatively unexplored mental state, we here examine how it relates to spontaneous thinking, namely, thought content and thought dynamics. By reviewing empirical studies on the neural correlates of MB, we first indicate that MB reports are mediated by variations in cortical and physiological arousal levels. In terms of thought content, we propose to view MB on a dimensional space representing content types, where MB is unrelated to any type of content. In terms of thought dynamics, we suggest conceptualizing MB as a moment during content transitioning or as a failure to transition across contents. Taken together, we suggest that MB has a unique place in the study of spontaneous thinking, and its inclusion can facilitate the isolation of the neural correlates of ongoing cognition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101481"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relating mind-blanking to the content and dynamics of spontaneous thinking\",\"authors\":\"Paradeisios Alexandros Boulakis ,&nbsp;Athena Demertzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>During wakefulness, the stream of thought is occasionally interrupted by moments when we cannot report any content, termed ‘mind-blanking’ (MB). As MB is a relatively unexplored mental state, we here examine how it relates to spontaneous thinking, namely, thought content and thought dynamics. By reviewing empirical studies on the neural correlates of MB, we first indicate that MB reports are mediated by variations in cortical and physiological arousal levels. In terms of thought content, we propose to view MB on a dimensional space representing content types, where MB is unrelated to any type of content. In terms of thought dynamics, we suggest conceptualizing MB as a moment during content transitioning or as a failure to transition across contents. Taken together, we suggest that MB has a unique place in the study of spontaneous thinking, and its inclusion can facilitate the isolation of the neural correlates of ongoing cognition.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101481\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154624001323\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154624001323","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在清醒的时候,思维流偶尔会被我们无法报告任何内容的时刻打断,这被称为“思维空白”(MB)。由于MB是一种相对未被探索的心理状态,我们在这里研究它与自发思维的关系,即思维内容和思维动态。通过回顾MB的神经相关的实证研究,我们首先指出MB报告是由皮层和生理唤醒水平的变化介导的。在思想内容方面,我们建议在表示内容类型的维度空间中查看MB,其中MB与任何类型的内容无关。在思想动力学方面,我们建议将MB概念化为内容过渡期间的一个时刻,或者是跨内容过渡的失败。综上所述,我们认为MB在自发思维的研究中具有独特的地位,它的包含可以促进对正在进行的认知的神经相关的分离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relating mind-blanking to the content and dynamics of spontaneous thinking
During wakefulness, the stream of thought is occasionally interrupted by moments when we cannot report any content, termed ‘mind-blanking’ (MB). As MB is a relatively unexplored mental state, we here examine how it relates to spontaneous thinking, namely, thought content and thought dynamics. By reviewing empirical studies on the neural correlates of MB, we first indicate that MB reports are mediated by variations in cortical and physiological arousal levels. In terms of thought content, we propose to view MB on a dimensional space representing content types, where MB is unrelated to any type of content. In terms of thought dynamics, we suggest conceptualizing MB as a moment during content transitioning or as a failure to transition across contents. Taken together, we suggest that MB has a unique place in the study of spontaneous thinking, and its inclusion can facilitate the isolation of the neural correlates of ongoing cognition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Neuroscience-Cognitive Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信