在传统和自动化测量方法的比较中,血压的反应性和偏差随年龄的变化而变化。

Medical instrumentation Pub Date : 1988-10-01
D W Harrison, M C Edwards
{"title":"在传统和自动化测量方法的比较中,血压的反应性和偏差随年龄的变化而变化。","authors":"D W Harrison,&nbsp;M C Edwards","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the effects of initial-reading reactivity and measurement methods of blood pressure across different age groups. Subjects were men and women (n = 132), 17 to 96 years of age. Two measurements were obtained from each subject, with a 1-min interval between trials. Each trial consisted of concurrent measurements from each arm, using a standard mercury manometer and an automated blood pressure monitor for use at home. A double-blind control procedure was used. Significant effects were obtained for age (younger, middle, and older age groups), method by trial and age by trial. The blood pressure reactivity and the effect of observer bias varied across age groups. The results support the hypotheses that blood pressure readings decline across trials; that observer bias using traditional methods is sufficient to mask this decline; and that the extent of reactivity and subsequent decline is dependent on age or an age-related increase in blood pressure. Implications of these findings for the use of automated monitoring instruments designed for use at home are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":76133,"journal":{"name":"Medical instrumentation","volume":"22 5","pages":"230-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blood pressure reactivity and bias vary with age in a comparison of traditional and automated methods of measurement.\",\"authors\":\"D W Harrison,&nbsp;M C Edwards\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examined the effects of initial-reading reactivity and measurement methods of blood pressure across different age groups. Subjects were men and women (n = 132), 17 to 96 years of age. Two measurements were obtained from each subject, with a 1-min interval between trials. Each trial consisted of concurrent measurements from each arm, using a standard mercury manometer and an automated blood pressure monitor for use at home. A double-blind control procedure was used. Significant effects were obtained for age (younger, middle, and older age groups), method by trial and age by trial. The blood pressure reactivity and the effect of observer bias varied across age groups. The results support the hypotheses that blood pressure readings decline across trials; that observer bias using traditional methods is sufficient to mask this decline; and that the extent of reactivity and subsequent decline is dependent on age or an age-related increase in blood pressure. Implications of these findings for the use of automated monitoring instruments designed for use at home are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical instrumentation\",\"volume\":\"22 5\",\"pages\":\"230-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical instrumentation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了不同年龄群体的初始阅读反应性和血压测量方法的影响。研究对象为男性和女性(n = 132),年龄17至96岁。从每个受试者中获得两次测量,试验之间间隔1分钟。每个试验包括同时测量每只手臂,使用标准水银血压计和家庭使用的自动血压监测仪。采用双盲对照程序。不同年龄(年轻、中年和老年组)、不同试验方法和不同试验年龄均获得显著效果。血压反应性和观察者偏倚的影响在不同年龄组有所不同。结果支持血压读数在试验中下降的假设;使用传统方法的观察者偏见足以掩盖这种下降;反应的程度和随后的下降取决于年龄或与年龄相关的血压升高。讨论了这些发现对使用设计用于家庭的自动监测仪器的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blood pressure reactivity and bias vary with age in a comparison of traditional and automated methods of measurement.

This study examined the effects of initial-reading reactivity and measurement methods of blood pressure across different age groups. Subjects were men and women (n = 132), 17 to 96 years of age. Two measurements were obtained from each subject, with a 1-min interval between trials. Each trial consisted of concurrent measurements from each arm, using a standard mercury manometer and an automated blood pressure monitor for use at home. A double-blind control procedure was used. Significant effects were obtained for age (younger, middle, and older age groups), method by trial and age by trial. The blood pressure reactivity and the effect of observer bias varied across age groups. The results support the hypotheses that blood pressure readings decline across trials; that observer bias using traditional methods is sufficient to mask this decline; and that the extent of reactivity and subsequent decline is dependent on age or an age-related increase in blood pressure. Implications of these findings for the use of automated monitoring instruments designed for use at home are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信