数字医疗工具与患者的工作:糖尿病患者数字治疗负担的定性调查

Misk A. Al Zahidy MS , Sue Simha BS , Megan Branda MS , Mariana Borras-Osorio MD , Maeva Haemmerle , Viet-Thi Tran MD, PhD , Jennifer L. Ridgeway PhD , Victor M. Montori MD
{"title":"数字医疗工具与患者的工作:糖尿病患者数字治疗负担的定性调查","authors":"Misk A. Al Zahidy MS ,&nbsp;Sue Simha BS ,&nbsp;Megan Branda MS ,&nbsp;Mariana Borras-Osorio MD ,&nbsp;Maeva Haemmerle ,&nbsp;Viet-Thi Tran MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Ridgeway PhD ,&nbsp;Victor M. Montori MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To understand the contribution of digital medicine tools (eg, continuous glucose monitoring systems, scheduling, and messaging applications) to treatment burden in patients with diabetes.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>Between October and November 2023, we invited patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes to participate in semistructured interviews. The interviewees completed the Treatment Burden Questionnaire as they reflected on how digital medicine tools affect their daily routines. A published taxonomy of treatment burden guided the qualitative content analysis of interview transcripts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 20 patients agreed to participate and completed interviews (aged 21-77 years, 55% female, 60% living with type 2 diabetes). We found 5 categories of tasks related to the use of digital medicine tools that patients had to complete (eg, calibrating continuous glucose monitors), 3 factors that made these tasks burdensome (eg, cost of device replacements), and 2 categories of consequences of burdensome tasks on patient wellbeing (eg, fatigue from device alarms).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients identified how digital medicine tools contribute to their treatment burden. The resulting digital burden taxonomy can be used to inform the design, implementation, and prescription of digital medicine tools including support for patients as they normalize them in their lives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74127,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Medicine Tools and the Work of Being a Patient: A Qualitative Investigation of Digital Treatment Burden in Patients With Diabetes\",\"authors\":\"Misk A. Al Zahidy MS ,&nbsp;Sue Simha BS ,&nbsp;Megan Branda MS ,&nbsp;Mariana Borras-Osorio MD ,&nbsp;Maeva Haemmerle ,&nbsp;Viet-Thi Tran MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Ridgeway PhD ,&nbsp;Victor M. Montori MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To understand the contribution of digital medicine tools (eg, continuous glucose monitoring systems, scheduling, and messaging applications) to treatment burden in patients with diabetes.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>Between October and November 2023, we invited patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes to participate in semistructured interviews. The interviewees completed the Treatment Burden Questionnaire as they reflected on how digital medicine tools affect their daily routines. A published taxonomy of treatment burden guided the qualitative content analysis of interview transcripts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 20 patients agreed to participate and completed interviews (aged 21-77 years, 55% female, 60% living with type 2 diabetes). We found 5 categories of tasks related to the use of digital medicine tools that patients had to complete (eg, calibrating continuous glucose monitors), 3 factors that made these tasks burdensome (eg, cost of device replacements), and 2 categories of consequences of burdensome tasks on patient wellbeing (eg, fatigue from device alarms).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients identified how digital medicine tools contribute to their treatment burden. The resulting digital burden taxonomy can be used to inform the design, implementation, and prescription of digital medicine tools including support for patients as they normalize them in their lives.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294976122400110X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294976122400110X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的了解数字医疗工具(如连续血糖监测系统、调度和信息应用程序)对糖尿病患者治疗负担的贡献。患者和方法在2023年10月至11月期间,我们邀请1型或2型糖尿病患者参加半结构化访谈。受访者完成了“治疗负担问卷”,并反映了数字医疗工具如何影响他们的日常生活。已发表的治疗负担分类法指导了访谈笔录的定性内容分析。结果共20例患者同意参与并完成访谈(年龄21-77岁,女性55%,2型糖尿病患者60%)。我们发现患者必须完成与使用数字医疗工具相关的5类任务(例如,校准连续血糖监测仪),3个因素使这些任务变得繁重(例如,设备更换的成本),以及2类繁重任务对患者健康的影响(例如,设备警报引起的疲劳)。结论:患者明确了数字医疗工具对其治疗负担的影响。由此产生的数字负担分类法可用于为数字医疗工具的设计、实施和处方提供信息,包括为患者提供支持,使其在生活中正常化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital Medicine Tools and the Work of Being a Patient: A Qualitative Investigation of Digital Treatment Burden in Patients With Diabetes

Objective

To understand the contribution of digital medicine tools (eg, continuous glucose monitoring systems, scheduling, and messaging applications) to treatment burden in patients with diabetes.

Patients and Methods

Between October and November 2023, we invited patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes to participate in semistructured interviews. The interviewees completed the Treatment Burden Questionnaire as they reflected on how digital medicine tools affect their daily routines. A published taxonomy of treatment burden guided the qualitative content analysis of interview transcripts.

Results

In total, 20 patients agreed to participate and completed interviews (aged 21-77 years, 55% female, 60% living with type 2 diabetes). We found 5 categories of tasks related to the use of digital medicine tools that patients had to complete (eg, calibrating continuous glucose monitors), 3 factors that made these tasks burdensome (eg, cost of device replacements), and 2 categories of consequences of burdensome tasks on patient wellbeing (eg, fatigue from device alarms).

Conclusion

Patients identified how digital medicine tools contribute to their treatment burden. The resulting digital burden taxonomy can be used to inform the design, implementation, and prescription of digital medicine tools including support for patients as they normalize them in their lives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health Medicine and Dentistry (General), Health Informatics, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信