医疗保健人工智能的安全和伦理实施:来自学术医疗中心的见解

Austin M. Stroud MA , Michele D. Anzabi MBE , Journey L. Wise BA , Barbara A. Barry PhD , Momin M. Malik PhD , Michelle L. McGowan PhD , Richard R. Sharp PhD
{"title":"医疗保健人工智能的安全和伦理实施:来自学术医疗中心的见解","authors":"Austin M. Stroud MA ,&nbsp;Michele D. Anzabi MBE ,&nbsp;Journey L. Wise BA ,&nbsp;Barbara A. Barry PhD ,&nbsp;Momin M. Malik PhD ,&nbsp;Michelle L. McGowan PhD ,&nbsp;Richard R. Sharp PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.100189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Claims abound that advances in artificial intelligence (AI) will permeate virtually every aspect of medicine and transform clinical practice. Simultaneously, concerns about the safety and equity of health care AI have prompted ethical and regulatory scrutiny from multiple oversight bodies. Positioned at the intersection of these perspectives, academic medical centers (AMCs) are charged with navigating the safe and responsible implementation of health care AI. Decisions about the use of AI at AMCs are complicated by uncertainties regarding the risks posed by these technologies and a lack of consensus on best practices for managing these risks. In this article, we highlight several potential harms that may arise in the adoption of health care AI, with a focus on risks to patients, clinicians, and medical practice. In addition, we describe several strategies that AMCs might adopt now to address concerns about the safety and ethical uses of health care AI. Our analysis aims to support AMCs as they seek to balance AI innovation with proactive oversight.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74127,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward Safe and Ethical Implementation of Health Care Artificial Intelligence: Insights From an Academic Medical Center\",\"authors\":\"Austin M. Stroud MA ,&nbsp;Michele D. Anzabi MBE ,&nbsp;Journey L. Wise BA ,&nbsp;Barbara A. Barry PhD ,&nbsp;Momin M. Malik PhD ,&nbsp;Michelle L. McGowan PhD ,&nbsp;Richard R. Sharp PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.100189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Claims abound that advances in artificial intelligence (AI) will permeate virtually every aspect of medicine and transform clinical practice. Simultaneously, concerns about the safety and equity of health care AI have prompted ethical and regulatory scrutiny from multiple oversight bodies. Positioned at the intersection of these perspectives, academic medical centers (AMCs) are charged with navigating the safe and responsible implementation of health care AI. Decisions about the use of AI at AMCs are complicated by uncertainties regarding the risks posed by these technologies and a lack of consensus on best practices for managing these risks. In this article, we highlight several potential harms that may arise in the adoption of health care AI, with a focus on risks to patients, clinicians, and medical practice. In addition, we describe several strategies that AMCs might adopt now to address concerns about the safety and ethical uses of health care AI. Our analysis aims to support AMCs as they seek to balance AI innovation with proactive oversight.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224001226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224001226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们普遍认为,人工智能(AI)的进步将渗透到医学的几乎每一个方面,并改变临床实践。同时,对卫生保健人工智能的安全性和公平性的担忧促使多个监督机构进行道德和监管审查。学术医疗中心(amc)位于这些观点的交叉点,负责引导医疗保健人工智能的安全和负责任的实施。由于这些技术带来的风险存在不确定性,以及对管理这些风险的最佳做法缺乏共识,有关在资产管理公司使用人工智能的决策变得复杂。在本文中,我们强调了采用医疗保健人工智能可能产生的几种潜在危害,重点是对患者、临床医生和医疗实践的风险。此外,我们描述了amc现在可能采用的几种策略,以解决对医疗保健人工智能的安全和伦理使用的担忧。我们的分析旨在支持资产管理公司寻求在人工智能创新与主动监管之间取得平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward Safe and Ethical Implementation of Health Care Artificial Intelligence: Insights From an Academic Medical Center
Claims abound that advances in artificial intelligence (AI) will permeate virtually every aspect of medicine and transform clinical practice. Simultaneously, concerns about the safety and equity of health care AI have prompted ethical and regulatory scrutiny from multiple oversight bodies. Positioned at the intersection of these perspectives, academic medical centers (AMCs) are charged with navigating the safe and responsible implementation of health care AI. Decisions about the use of AI at AMCs are complicated by uncertainties regarding the risks posed by these technologies and a lack of consensus on best practices for managing these risks. In this article, we highlight several potential harms that may arise in the adoption of health care AI, with a focus on risks to patients, clinicians, and medical practice. In addition, we describe several strategies that AMCs might adopt now to address concerns about the safety and ethical uses of health care AI. Our analysis aims to support AMCs as they seek to balance AI innovation with proactive oversight.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health Medicine and Dentistry (General), Health Informatics, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信