从一艘退役军舰上恢复的甲板支架的极限强度

IF 4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Malcolm Smith , Ken Nahshon , Teresa Magoga , Radu Chiritoiu , Prahshanth Sivapalan
{"title":"从一艘退役军舰上恢复的甲板支架的极限强度","authors":"Malcolm Smith ,&nbsp;Ken Nahshon ,&nbsp;Teresa Magoga ,&nbsp;Radu Chiritoiu ,&nbsp;Prahshanth Sivapalan","doi":"10.1016/j.marstruc.2024.103764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cyclic ultimate strength testing of four deck grillage structures recovered from a decommissioned naval destroyer was conducted at Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division to explore the behavior of in-service ship structure and generate data for modeling and simulation comparisons. The test articles spanned 3 or 4 complete frame bays of the original structure and included features typical of ship construction such as non-uniform thickness and frame spacing, hatch openings, and weld seams. Prior to strength testing, thickness and shape measurements were conducted on all test specimens, including full LiDAR scanning, and material properties were measured from coupons recovered from each grillage. Measured ultimate strength, post-collapse strength, load-shortening response collapse mode and location are compared with nonlinear FEA and Smith's method predictions. Numerical assessments were performed in two modelling configurations: nominal configuration, using design scantlings and material properties; and the actual configuration, using all pre-test measured data. Nonlinear FEA predictions indicate interframe collapse modes in a central frame bay, consistent with the test results, although differences in the collapse location and collapse mode of individual stiffeners are observed. Prediction of ultimate and post-collapse strength is shown to be greatly improved in the actual configuration, in particular when using measured material properties. Agreement between predictions and measured ultimate strengths is good, and Smith's method strength predictions are found to be comparable to FEA predictions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49879,"journal":{"name":"Marine Structures","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 103764"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultimate strength of deck grillages recovered from a decommissioned warship\",\"authors\":\"Malcolm Smith ,&nbsp;Ken Nahshon ,&nbsp;Teresa Magoga ,&nbsp;Radu Chiritoiu ,&nbsp;Prahshanth Sivapalan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marstruc.2024.103764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cyclic ultimate strength testing of four deck grillage structures recovered from a decommissioned naval destroyer was conducted at Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division to explore the behavior of in-service ship structure and generate data for modeling and simulation comparisons. The test articles spanned 3 or 4 complete frame bays of the original structure and included features typical of ship construction such as non-uniform thickness and frame spacing, hatch openings, and weld seams. Prior to strength testing, thickness and shape measurements were conducted on all test specimens, including full LiDAR scanning, and material properties were measured from coupons recovered from each grillage. Measured ultimate strength, post-collapse strength, load-shortening response collapse mode and location are compared with nonlinear FEA and Smith's method predictions. Numerical assessments were performed in two modelling configurations: nominal configuration, using design scantlings and material properties; and the actual configuration, using all pre-test measured data. Nonlinear FEA predictions indicate interframe collapse modes in a central frame bay, consistent with the test results, although differences in the collapse location and collapse mode of individual stiffeners are observed. Prediction of ultimate and post-collapse strength is shown to be greatly improved in the actual configuration, in particular when using measured material properties. Agreement between predictions and measured ultimate strengths is good, and Smith's method strength predictions are found to be comparable to FEA predictions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Structures\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951833924001928\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951833924001928","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在海军水面作战中心Carderock分部对一艘退役海军驱逐舰上回收的四个甲板格架结构进行了循环极限强度测试,以探索在役舰船结构的行为,并为建模和仿真比较生成数据。测试物品跨越3或4个完整的原始结构框架舱,并包括船舶结构的典型特征,如非均匀厚度和框架间距,舱口开口和焊缝。在强度测试之前,对所有试件进行了厚度和形状测量,包括全激光雷达扫描,并从每个格栅回收的薄片中测量材料性能。将实测极限强度、倒塌后强度、荷载缩短响应、倒塌模式和位置与非线性有限元分析和Smith方法预测结果进行了比较。在两种建模配置下进行了数值评估:标称配置,使用设计尺寸和材料特性;和实际配置,使用所有的预测试测量数据。非线性有限元分析预测表明,在一个中心框架区,框架间的破坏模式与试验结果一致,尽管观察到单个加强筋的破坏位置和破坏模式存在差异。在实际配置中,特别是在使用测量的材料性能时,显示出对极限和倒塌后强度的预测有很大的改进。预测和测量的最终强度之间的一致性很好,并且发现Smith的方法强度预测与FEA预测相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultimate strength of deck grillages recovered from a decommissioned warship
Cyclic ultimate strength testing of four deck grillage structures recovered from a decommissioned naval destroyer was conducted at Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division to explore the behavior of in-service ship structure and generate data for modeling and simulation comparisons. The test articles spanned 3 or 4 complete frame bays of the original structure and included features typical of ship construction such as non-uniform thickness and frame spacing, hatch openings, and weld seams. Prior to strength testing, thickness and shape measurements were conducted on all test specimens, including full LiDAR scanning, and material properties were measured from coupons recovered from each grillage. Measured ultimate strength, post-collapse strength, load-shortening response collapse mode and location are compared with nonlinear FEA and Smith's method predictions. Numerical assessments were performed in two modelling configurations: nominal configuration, using design scantlings and material properties; and the actual configuration, using all pre-test measured data. Nonlinear FEA predictions indicate interframe collapse modes in a central frame bay, consistent with the test results, although differences in the collapse location and collapse mode of individual stiffeners are observed. Prediction of ultimate and post-collapse strength is shown to be greatly improved in the actual configuration, in particular when using measured material properties. Agreement between predictions and measured ultimate strengths is good, and Smith's method strength predictions are found to be comparable to FEA predictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marine Structures
Marine Structures 工程技术-工程:海洋
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
157
审稿时长
6.4 months
期刊介绍: This journal aims to provide a medium for presentation and discussion of the latest developments in research, design, fabrication and in-service experience relating to marine structures, i.e., all structures of steel, concrete, light alloy or composite construction having an interface with the sea, including ships, fixed and mobile offshore platforms, submarine and submersibles, pipelines, subsea systems for shallow and deep ocean operations and coastal structures such as piers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信