Xueying Li , Yepeng Guo , Antonio Augusto Ornellas , Jiun-Hung Geng , Yonghong Li , Wayne Lam , Yabing Cao , Zhuowei Liu , Hui Han , Fangjian Zhou , Zaishang Li
{"title":"第八届美国癌症解剖和预后分期联合委员会对阴茎癌的预后价值:一项多中心合作研究","authors":"Xueying Li , Yepeng Guo , Antonio Augusto Ornellas , Jiun-Hung Geng , Yonghong Li , Wayne Lam , Yabing Cao , Zhuowei Liu , Hui Han , Fangjian Zhou , Zaishang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ajur.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this study was to investigate the value of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) anatomic and prognostic stage groups for penile cancer patients and explore whether there is room for improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The clinical and histopathologic data from 16 centers between January 2000 and December 2021 were assessed according to the 8th AJCC anatomic and prognostic stage groups. Kaplan–Meier plots were used to estimate the disease-specific survival (DSS) of the patients. The accuracy of the staging systems was investigated using the Harrell's concordance index (C-index).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>According to the 8th AJCC anatomic and prognostic stage groups, the 5-year DSS rates for patients with stages 0is/a, I, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IV disease were 100%, 99%, 86%, 81%, 66%, 34%, and 23%, respectively (<em>p</em><sub>0is/a–I</sub>=0.8, <em>p</em><sub>I–IIA</sub><0.001, <em>p</em><sub>IIA–IIB</sub>=0.5, <em>p</em><sub>IIB–IIIA</sub><0.001, <em>p</em><sub>IIIA–IIIB</sub><0.001, <em>p</em><sub>IIIB–IV</sub>=0.004, and <em>p</em><sub>Total</sub><0.001). According to the modified model 1 system, the 5-year DSS rates without survivorship overlap for patients with stages 0is/a, I, II, IIIA, IIIB, and IV disease were 100%, 99%, 88%, 66%, 34%, and 23%, respectively (<em>p</em><sub>0is/a–I</sub>=0.8, <em>p</em><sub>I–II</sub><0.001, <em>p</em><sub>II–IIIA</sub>=0.002, <em>p</em><sub>IIIA–IIIB</sub><0.001, <em>p</em><sub>IIIB–IV</sub>=0.004, and <em>p</em><sub>Total</sub><0.001). Similarly, according to the modified model 2 system, the 5-year DSS rates without survivorship overlap for patients with stages 0is/a, I, II, IIIA, IIIB, and IV disease were 100%, 99%, 86%, 66%, 34%, and 23%, respectively (<em>p</em><sub>0is/a–I</sub>=0.8, <em>p</em><sub>I–II</sub><0.001, <em>p</em><sub>II–IIIA</sub>=0.008, <em>p</em><sub>IIIA–IIIB</sub><0.001, <em>p</em><sub>IIIB–IV</sub>=0.004, and <em>p</em><sub>Total</sub><0.001). The C-index scores of the simple modified staging systems were not inferior to those of the AJCC anatomic and prognostic stage groups. These results were confirmed by the bootstrap internal validation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is still room for improvement about the 8th AJCC anatomic and prognostic stage groups. The improved models, which are more concise and convenient, have similar prediction accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46599,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Urology","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 100-105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prognostic value of the 8th American Joint Committee on cancer anatomic and prognostic stage groups for penile cancer: A multicenter collaboration study\",\"authors\":\"Xueying Li , Yepeng Guo , Antonio Augusto Ornellas , Jiun-Hung Geng , Yonghong Li , Wayne Lam , Yabing Cao , Zhuowei Liu , Hui Han , Fangjian Zhou , Zaishang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajur.2024.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this study was to investigate the value of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) anatomic and prognostic stage groups for penile cancer patients and explore whether there is room for improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The clinical and histopathologic data from 16 centers between January 2000 and December 2021 were assessed according to the 8th AJCC anatomic and prognostic stage groups. Kaplan–Meier plots were used to estimate the disease-specific survival (DSS) of the patients. The accuracy of the staging systems was investigated using the Harrell's concordance index (C-index).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>According to the 8th AJCC anatomic and prognostic stage groups, the 5-year DSS rates for patients with stages 0is/a, I, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IV disease were 100%, 99%, 86%, 81%, 66%, 34%, and 23%, respectively (<em>p</em><sub>0is/a–I</sub>=0.8, <em>p</em><sub>I–IIA</sub><0.001, <em>p</em><sub>IIA–IIB</sub>=0.5, <em>p</em><sub>IIB–IIIA</sub><0.001, <em>p</em><sub>IIIA–IIIB</sub><0.001, <em>p</em><sub>IIIB–IV</sub>=0.004, and <em>p</em><sub>Total</sub><0.001). According to the modified model 1 system, the 5-year DSS rates without survivorship overlap for patients with stages 0is/a, I, II, IIIA, IIIB, and IV disease were 100%, 99%, 88%, 66%, 34%, and 23%, respectively (<em>p</em><sub>0is/a–I</sub>=0.8, <em>p</em><sub>I–II</sub><0.001, <em>p</em><sub>II–IIIA</sub>=0.002, <em>p</em><sub>IIIA–IIIB</sub><0.001, <em>p</em><sub>IIIB–IV</sub>=0.004, and <em>p</em><sub>Total</sub><0.001). Similarly, according to the modified model 2 system, the 5-year DSS rates without survivorship overlap for patients with stages 0is/a, I, II, IIIA, IIIB, and IV disease were 100%, 99%, 86%, 66%, 34%, and 23%, respectively (<em>p</em><sub>0is/a–I</sub>=0.8, <em>p</em><sub>I–II</sub><0.001, <em>p</em><sub>II–IIIA</sub>=0.008, <em>p</em><sub>IIIA–IIIB</sub><0.001, <em>p</em><sub>IIIB–IV</sub>=0.004, and <em>p</em><sub>Total</sub><0.001). The C-index scores of the simple modified staging systems were not inferior to those of the AJCC anatomic and prognostic stage groups. These results were confirmed by the bootstrap internal validation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is still room for improvement about the 8th AJCC anatomic and prognostic stage groups. The improved models, which are more concise and convenient, have similar prediction accuracy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 100-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214388224001176\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214388224001176","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The prognostic value of the 8th American Joint Committee on cancer anatomic and prognostic stage groups for penile cancer: A multicenter collaboration study
Objective
The aim of this study was to investigate the value of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) anatomic and prognostic stage groups for penile cancer patients and explore whether there is room for improvement.
Methods
The clinical and histopathologic data from 16 centers between January 2000 and December 2021 were assessed according to the 8th AJCC anatomic and prognostic stage groups. Kaplan–Meier plots were used to estimate the disease-specific survival (DSS) of the patients. The accuracy of the staging systems was investigated using the Harrell's concordance index (C-index).
Results
According to the 8th AJCC anatomic and prognostic stage groups, the 5-year DSS rates for patients with stages 0is/a, I, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, and IV disease were 100%, 99%, 86%, 81%, 66%, 34%, and 23%, respectively (p0is/a–I=0.8, pI–IIA<0.001, pIIA–IIB=0.5, pIIB–IIIA<0.001, pIIIA–IIIB<0.001, pIIIB–IV=0.004, and pTotal<0.001). According to the modified model 1 system, the 5-year DSS rates without survivorship overlap for patients with stages 0is/a, I, II, IIIA, IIIB, and IV disease were 100%, 99%, 88%, 66%, 34%, and 23%, respectively (p0is/a–I=0.8, pI–II<0.001, pII–IIIA=0.002, pIIIA–IIIB<0.001, pIIIB–IV=0.004, and pTotal<0.001). Similarly, according to the modified model 2 system, the 5-year DSS rates without survivorship overlap for patients with stages 0is/a, I, II, IIIA, IIIB, and IV disease were 100%, 99%, 86%, 66%, 34%, and 23%, respectively (p0is/a–I=0.8, pI–II<0.001, pII–IIIA=0.008, pIIIA–IIIB<0.001, pIIIB–IV=0.004, and pTotal<0.001). The C-index scores of the simple modified staging systems were not inferior to those of the AJCC anatomic and prognostic stage groups. These results were confirmed by the bootstrap internal validation.
Conclusion
There is still room for improvement about the 8th AJCC anatomic and prognostic stage groups. The improved models, which are more concise and convenient, have similar prediction accuracy.
期刊介绍:
Asian Journal of Urology (AJUR), launched in October 2014, is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal jointly founded by Shanghai Association for Science and Technology (SAST) and Second Military Medical University (SMMU). AJUR aims to build a communication platform for international researchers to effectively share scholarly achievements. It focuses on all specialties of urology both scientifically and clinically, with article types widely covering editorials, opinions, perspectives, reviews and mini-reviews, original articles, cases reports, rapid communications, and letters, etc. Fields of particular interest to the journal including, but not limited to: • Surgical oncology • Endourology • Calculi • Female urology • Erectile dysfunction • Infertility • Pediatric urology • Renal transplantation • Reconstructive surgery • Radiology • Pathology • Neurourology.