bowley -最优凸负载溢价原理

IF 2.2 2区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Mario Ghossoub, Bin Li, Benxuan Shi
{"title":"bowley -最优凸负载溢价原理","authors":"Mario Ghossoub,&nbsp;Bin Li,&nbsp;Benxuan Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.insmatheco.2025.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper contributes to the literature on Stackelberg equilibria (Bowley optima) in monopolistic centralized sequential-move insurance markets in several ways. We consider a class of premium principles defined as expectations of increasing and convex functions of the indemnities. We refer to these as <em>convex-loaded premium principles</em>. Our analysis restricts the <em>ex ante</em> admissible class of indemnity functions to the two most popular and practically relevant classes: the deductible indemnities and the proportional indemnities, both of which satisfy the so-called no-sabotage condition. We study Bowley optimality of premium principles within the class of convex-loaded premium principles, when the indemnity functions are either of the deductible type or of the coinsurance type. Assuming that the policyholder is a risk-averse expected-utility maximizer, while the insurer is a risk-neutral expected-profit maximizer, we find that the <em>expected-value premium principle</em> is Bowley optimal for proportional indemnities, while the <em>stop-loss premium principle</em> is Bowley optimal for deductible indemnities under a mild condition. Methodologically, we introduce a novel <em>dual approach</em> to characterize Bowley optima.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54974,"journal":{"name":"Insurance Mathematics & Economics","volume":"121 ","pages":"Pages 157-180"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bowley-optimal convex-loaded premium principles\",\"authors\":\"Mario Ghossoub,&nbsp;Bin Li,&nbsp;Benxuan Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.insmatheco.2025.01.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper contributes to the literature on Stackelberg equilibria (Bowley optima) in monopolistic centralized sequential-move insurance markets in several ways. We consider a class of premium principles defined as expectations of increasing and convex functions of the indemnities. We refer to these as <em>convex-loaded premium principles</em>. Our analysis restricts the <em>ex ante</em> admissible class of indemnity functions to the two most popular and practically relevant classes: the deductible indemnities and the proportional indemnities, both of which satisfy the so-called no-sabotage condition. We study Bowley optimality of premium principles within the class of convex-loaded premium principles, when the indemnity functions are either of the deductible type or of the coinsurance type. Assuming that the policyholder is a risk-averse expected-utility maximizer, while the insurer is a risk-neutral expected-profit maximizer, we find that the <em>expected-value premium principle</em> is Bowley optimal for proportional indemnities, while the <em>stop-loss premium principle</em> is Bowley optimal for deductible indemnities under a mild condition. Methodologically, we introduce a novel <em>dual approach</em> to characterize Bowley optima.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insurance Mathematics & Economics\",\"volume\":\"121 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 157-180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insurance Mathematics & Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668725000174\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insurance Mathematics & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668725000174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从几个方面对垄断集中式顺序移动保险市场的Stackelberg均衡(Bowley最优)的文献作了贡献。我们考虑一类保费原则,定义为赔偿的增加函数和凸函数的期望。我们把这些称为凸负载溢价原则。我们的分析将事前可接受的赔偿功能限制在两个最流行和实际相关的类别:可扣除赔偿和比例赔偿,两者都满足所谓的无破坏条件。本文研究了在凸负荷保费原则类别中,当赔偿函数为免赔型或共保型时,保费原则的Bowley最优性。假设投保人是风险厌恶的期望效用最大化者,保险人是风险中性的期望利润最大化者,我们发现在温和条件下,对于比例赔偿,期望值保费原则是Bowley最优,对于免赔赔偿,止损保费原则是Bowley最优。在方法上,我们引入了一种新的双重方法来表征鲍利最优。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bowley-optimal convex-loaded premium principles
This paper contributes to the literature on Stackelberg equilibria (Bowley optima) in monopolistic centralized sequential-move insurance markets in several ways. We consider a class of premium principles defined as expectations of increasing and convex functions of the indemnities. We refer to these as convex-loaded premium principles. Our analysis restricts the ex ante admissible class of indemnity functions to the two most popular and practically relevant classes: the deductible indemnities and the proportional indemnities, both of which satisfy the so-called no-sabotage condition. We study Bowley optimality of premium principles within the class of convex-loaded premium principles, when the indemnity functions are either of the deductible type or of the coinsurance type. Assuming that the policyholder is a risk-averse expected-utility maximizer, while the insurer is a risk-neutral expected-profit maximizer, we find that the expected-value premium principle is Bowley optimal for proportional indemnities, while the stop-loss premium principle is Bowley optimal for deductible indemnities under a mild condition. Methodologically, we introduce a novel dual approach to characterize Bowley optima.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Insurance Mathematics & Economics
Insurance Mathematics & Economics 管理科学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
90
审稿时长
17.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Insurance: Mathematics and Economics publishes leading research spanning all fields of actuarial science research. It appears six times per year and is the largest journal in actuarial science research around the world. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics is an international academic journal that aims to strengthen the communication between individuals and groups who develop and apply research results in actuarial science. The journal feels a particular obligation to facilitate closer cooperation between those who conduct research in insurance mathematics and quantitative insurance economics, and practicing actuaries who are interested in the implementation of the results. To this purpose, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics publishes high-quality articles of broad international interest, concerned with either the theory of insurance mathematics and quantitative insurance economics or the inventive application of it, including empirical or experimental results. Articles that combine several of these aspects are particularly considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信