同伴教学在心理急救训练中提高学生自我效能感:一项先导随机对照试验

Q2 Medicine
Ayu Cyntia Tanto , Conrad L.H. Folamauk , R.Pasifikus C. Wijaya , Nicholas E. Handoyo
{"title":"同伴教学在心理急救训练中提高学生自我效能感:一项先导随机对照试验","authors":"Ayu Cyntia Tanto ,&nbsp;Conrad L.H. Folamauk ,&nbsp;R.Pasifikus C. Wijaya ,&nbsp;Nicholas E. Handoyo","doi":"10.1016/j.mhp.2025.200396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Students’ mental health disorders are increasing. However, there is a lack of studies on using the peer teaching method, where students teach other students to address the problem and improve students’ general self-efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To measure the feasibility of the peer teaching method in PFA training to promote self-efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This feasibility pilot study has a randomised controlled design. Data were collected pre- and post-intervention using the online general self-efficacy scale and reflection sheet. The number of enrolled participants, the proportion of enrolled participants who attended at least one session, the retention rate, and program acceptability were analysed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 85 out of 208 students (40,9 %) who enrolled and randomised joined the study. Twenty-eight out of 104 participants (26,9 %) in the intervention group attended their training, much lower than that of the control group (74 out of 104 participants completed post-tests). However, only 25 out of 28 participants (89,3 %) completed their training. Results indicated positive responses from the participants, who felt the training was enjoyable and increased their knowledge of basic PFA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study found that the peer teaching method in a simplified PFA training session, without supervision, was feasible as a mental health intervention in a low-resource setting and acceptable for students to gain skills and knowledge about basic PFA. However, to increase students' participation, approaches need to be modified to increase program flexibility tailored to their time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55864,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health and Prevention","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 200396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer teaching in Psychological First Aid Training to promote students’ self-efficacy: A pilot randomised control trial\",\"authors\":\"Ayu Cyntia Tanto ,&nbsp;Conrad L.H. Folamauk ,&nbsp;R.Pasifikus C. Wijaya ,&nbsp;Nicholas E. Handoyo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mhp.2025.200396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Students’ mental health disorders are increasing. However, there is a lack of studies on using the peer teaching method, where students teach other students to address the problem and improve students’ general self-efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To measure the feasibility of the peer teaching method in PFA training to promote self-efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>This feasibility pilot study has a randomised controlled design. Data were collected pre- and post-intervention using the online general self-efficacy scale and reflection sheet. The number of enrolled participants, the proportion of enrolled participants who attended at least one session, the retention rate, and program acceptability were analysed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 85 out of 208 students (40,9 %) who enrolled and randomised joined the study. Twenty-eight out of 104 participants (26,9 %) in the intervention group attended their training, much lower than that of the control group (74 out of 104 participants completed post-tests). However, only 25 out of 28 participants (89,3 %) completed their training. Results indicated positive responses from the participants, who felt the training was enjoyable and increased their knowledge of basic PFA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study found that the peer teaching method in a simplified PFA training session, without supervision, was feasible as a mental health intervention in a low-resource setting and acceptable for students to gain skills and knowledge about basic PFA. However, to increase students' participation, approaches need to be modified to increase program flexibility tailored to their time.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental Health and Prevention\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"Article 200396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental Health and Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212657025000066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212657025000066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学生的心理健康问题越来越多。然而,缺乏使用同伴教学方法的研究,即学生教其他学生解决问题,提高学生的总体自我效能感。目的探讨同伴教学法在PFA培训中提高自我效能感的可行性。材料与方法本可行性初步研究采用随机对照设计。使用在线一般自我效能量表和反思表收集干预前后的数据。分析了参与人数、至少参加一次课程的参与者比例、保留率和课程可接受性。结果208名学生中有85名(40.9%)被随机纳入研究。干预组104名参与者中有28人(26.9%)参加了培训,远低于对照组(104名参与者中有74人完成了后测试)。然而,28名参与者中只有25人(89.3%)完成了他们的培训。结果显示,参与者反应积极,他们觉得培训是愉快的,并增加了他们的基本PFA知识。结论在低资源环境下,同伴教学法在无监督的简易PFA培训中是一种可行的心理健康干预方法,可使学生获得基本的PFA技能和知识。然而,为了提高学生的参与度,需要修改方法,增加项目的灵活性,以适应他们的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peer teaching in Psychological First Aid Training to promote students’ self-efficacy: A pilot randomised control trial

Introduction

Students’ mental health disorders are increasing. However, there is a lack of studies on using the peer teaching method, where students teach other students to address the problem and improve students’ general self-efficacy.

Aim

To measure the feasibility of the peer teaching method in PFA training to promote self-efficacy.

Materials and Methods

This feasibility pilot study has a randomised controlled design. Data were collected pre- and post-intervention using the online general self-efficacy scale and reflection sheet. The number of enrolled participants, the proportion of enrolled participants who attended at least one session, the retention rate, and program acceptability were analysed.

Results

A total of 85 out of 208 students (40,9 %) who enrolled and randomised joined the study. Twenty-eight out of 104 participants (26,9 %) in the intervention group attended their training, much lower than that of the control group (74 out of 104 participants completed post-tests). However, only 25 out of 28 participants (89,3 %) completed their training. Results indicated positive responses from the participants, who felt the training was enjoyable and increased their knowledge of basic PFA.

Conclusion

The study found that the peer teaching method in a simplified PFA training session, without supervision, was feasible as a mental health intervention in a low-resource setting and acceptable for students to gain skills and knowledge about basic PFA. However, to increase students' participation, approaches need to be modified to increase program flexibility tailored to their time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mental Health and Prevention
Mental Health and Prevention Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
24 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信