慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重期住院患者雾化长效支气管扩张剂与短效支气管扩张剂的安全性、有效性和可行性

Rajiv Dhand MD , Samuel Treat MD , Jennifer Ferris MSHS , Paul D. Terry PhD , Tracy Walker BA , Scott Elder RRT , Daniel Church RRT , Danielle Dennis PharmD , Barbara Faircloth PharmD , Gulsah Onar MPH , R. Eric Heidel PhD , Isaac Biney MD , Martin Valdes MD , Milind Bhagat MBBS , Nicholas Fuerst MD , Shannon Cusick RN
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重期住院患者雾化长效支气管扩张剂与短效支气管扩张剂的安全性、有效性和可行性","authors":"Rajiv Dhand MD ,&nbsp;Samuel Treat MD ,&nbsp;Jennifer Ferris MSHS ,&nbsp;Paul D. Terry PhD ,&nbsp;Tracy Walker BA ,&nbsp;Scott Elder RRT ,&nbsp;Daniel Church RRT ,&nbsp;Danielle Dennis PharmD ,&nbsp;Barbara Faircloth PharmD ,&nbsp;Gulsah Onar MPH ,&nbsp;R. Eric Heidel PhD ,&nbsp;Isaac Biney MD ,&nbsp;Martin Valdes MD ,&nbsp;Milind Bhagat MBBS ,&nbsp;Nicholas Fuerst MD ,&nbsp;Shannon Cusick RN","doi":"10.1016/j.chpulm.2024.100105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Long-acting bronchodilators are preferred over short-acting bronchodilators in patients with stable COPD, but prospective studies are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of nebulized long-acting bronchodilators in hospitalized patients with exacerbations of COPD.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>In hospitalized patients with exacerbations of COPD, is a combination of nebulized long-acting formoterol/revefenacin as safe and effective as the short-acting nebulized albuterol/ipratropium combination?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>We conducted a prospective, randomized, parallel-group study comparing a nebulized formoterol/revefenacin combination with an albuterol/ipratropium combination among 60 hospitalized patients (30 in each group) with exacerbations of COPD who tested negative for COVID-19. Treatments were administered every 12 to 24 hours (formoterol/revefenacin) or every 6 hours (albuterol/ipratropium) by jet nebulizers for up to 7 days. Safety and efficacy assessments were recorded on days 1, 3, and 7, or at hospital discharge. Assessment of dyspnea by the Modified Borg dyspnea scale was the primary outcome. Data were analyzed with parametric or nonparametric statistical tests, and generalized estimating equations with an identity link function were used to analyze differences in the two groups. Statistical significance was assumed at an unadjusted two-sided alpha value of 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants’ mean age was 63.2 (SD, 9.30) years, and 39 (65.0%) reported active tobacco use. Patients’ age, sex, race, smoking history, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, supplemental oxygen requirements, and length of hospital stay were similar in the two groups (<em>P</em> &gt; .05 for all). Patients receiving formoterol/revefenacin had similar Modified Borg dyspnea scores (<em>P</em> = .95) and required fewer total drug doses (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), but there was a nonsignificant trend for more frequent rescue treatments (<em>P</em> = .08) compared with those receiving albuterol/ipratropium. There were no serious adverse events or treatment failures in either group.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Our findings indicate that in nonventilated hospitalized patients with exacerbations of COPD, the institution of nebulized formoterol/revefenacin in combination within 24 to 36 hours of hospital admission provided convenient dosing and required fewer drug doses to achieve comparable efficacy and safety with the standard short-acting nebulized albuterol/ipratropium combination.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94286,"journal":{"name":"CHEST pulmonary","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety, Efficacy, and Feasibility of Nebulized Long-Acting Bronchodilators vs Short-Acting Bronchodilators in Hospitalized Patients With Acute Exacerbations of COPD\",\"authors\":\"Rajiv Dhand MD ,&nbsp;Samuel Treat MD ,&nbsp;Jennifer Ferris MSHS ,&nbsp;Paul D. Terry PhD ,&nbsp;Tracy Walker BA ,&nbsp;Scott Elder RRT ,&nbsp;Daniel Church RRT ,&nbsp;Danielle Dennis PharmD ,&nbsp;Barbara Faircloth PharmD ,&nbsp;Gulsah Onar MPH ,&nbsp;R. Eric Heidel PhD ,&nbsp;Isaac Biney MD ,&nbsp;Martin Valdes MD ,&nbsp;Milind Bhagat MBBS ,&nbsp;Nicholas Fuerst MD ,&nbsp;Shannon Cusick RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chpulm.2024.100105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Long-acting bronchodilators are preferred over short-acting bronchodilators in patients with stable COPD, but prospective studies are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of nebulized long-acting bronchodilators in hospitalized patients with exacerbations of COPD.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>In hospitalized patients with exacerbations of COPD, is a combination of nebulized long-acting formoterol/revefenacin as safe and effective as the short-acting nebulized albuterol/ipratropium combination?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>We conducted a prospective, randomized, parallel-group study comparing a nebulized formoterol/revefenacin combination with an albuterol/ipratropium combination among 60 hospitalized patients (30 in each group) with exacerbations of COPD who tested negative for COVID-19. Treatments were administered every 12 to 24 hours (formoterol/revefenacin) or every 6 hours (albuterol/ipratropium) by jet nebulizers for up to 7 days. Safety and efficacy assessments were recorded on days 1, 3, and 7, or at hospital discharge. Assessment of dyspnea by the Modified Borg dyspnea scale was the primary outcome. Data were analyzed with parametric or nonparametric statistical tests, and generalized estimating equations with an identity link function were used to analyze differences in the two groups. Statistical significance was assumed at an unadjusted two-sided alpha value of 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants’ mean age was 63.2 (SD, 9.30) years, and 39 (65.0%) reported active tobacco use. Patients’ age, sex, race, smoking history, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, supplemental oxygen requirements, and length of hospital stay were similar in the two groups (<em>P</em> &gt; .05 for all). Patients receiving formoterol/revefenacin had similar Modified Borg dyspnea scores (<em>P</em> = .95) and required fewer total drug doses (<em>P</em> &lt; .001), but there was a nonsignificant trend for more frequent rescue treatments (<em>P</em> = .08) compared with those receiving albuterol/ipratropium. There were no serious adverse events or treatment failures in either group.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Our findings indicate that in nonventilated hospitalized patients with exacerbations of COPD, the institution of nebulized formoterol/revefenacin in combination within 24 to 36 hours of hospital admission provided convenient dosing and required fewer drug doses to achieve comparable efficacy and safety with the standard short-acting nebulized albuterol/ipratropium combination.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHEST pulmonary\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHEST pulmonary\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789224000710\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST pulmonary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789224000710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在稳定期COPD患者中,长效支气管扩张剂比短效支气管扩张剂更受青睐,但雾化长效支气管扩张剂在COPD急性加重住院患者中的安全性和有效性还需要前瞻性研究来确定。研究问题:在COPD急性加重住院患者中,雾化长效福莫特罗/雷芬酸是否与雾化短效沙丁胺醇/异丙托品联合用药一样安全有效?研究设计和方法我们进行了一项前瞻性、随机、平行组研究,比较了雾化福莫特罗/利芬酸联合用药与沙丁胺醇/异丙托品联合用药在60例住院的慢性阻塞性肺病加重患者(每组30例)中COVID-19检测呈阴性。每12 ~ 24小时(福莫特罗/ revfenacin)或每6小时(沙丁胺醇/异丙托品)用喷射喷雾器进行治疗,持续7天。在第1、3、7天或出院时记录安全性和有效性评估。用改良Borg呼吸困难量表评估呼吸困难是主要结果。使用参数或非参数统计检验对数据进行分析,并使用具有恒等联系函数的广义估计方程来分析两组之间的差异。以未调整的双侧alpha值0.05假设统计学显著性。结果参与者平均年龄为63.2岁(SD, 9.30), 39人(65.0%)报告有吸烟行为。两组患者的年龄、性别、种族、吸烟史、BMI、Charlson合并症指数评分、补充需氧量和住院时间相似(P >;0.05)。接受福莫特罗/利芬酸治疗的患者有相似的改良Borg呼吸困难评分(P = 0.95),并且需要更少的总药物剂量(P <;.001),但与接受沙丁胺醇/异丙托品治疗的患者相比,接受更频繁的抢救治疗的趋势不显著(P = .08)。两组均无严重不良事件或治疗失败。我们的研究结果表明,在非通气的慢性阻塞性肺病加重住院患者中,在入院24 - 36小时内联合雾化福莫特罗/利芬酸提供了方便的给药,并且需要更少的药物剂量,以达到与标准短效雾化沙丁胺醇/异丙托品联合相当的疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety, Efficacy, and Feasibility of Nebulized Long-Acting Bronchodilators vs Short-Acting Bronchodilators in Hospitalized Patients With Acute Exacerbations of COPD

Background

Long-acting bronchodilators are preferred over short-acting bronchodilators in patients with stable COPD, but prospective studies are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of nebulized long-acting bronchodilators in hospitalized patients with exacerbations of COPD.

Research Question

In hospitalized patients with exacerbations of COPD, is a combination of nebulized long-acting formoterol/revefenacin as safe and effective as the short-acting nebulized albuterol/ipratropium combination?

Study Design and Methods

We conducted a prospective, randomized, parallel-group study comparing a nebulized formoterol/revefenacin combination with an albuterol/ipratropium combination among 60 hospitalized patients (30 in each group) with exacerbations of COPD who tested negative for COVID-19. Treatments were administered every 12 to 24 hours (formoterol/revefenacin) or every 6 hours (albuterol/ipratropium) by jet nebulizers for up to 7 days. Safety and efficacy assessments were recorded on days 1, 3, and 7, or at hospital discharge. Assessment of dyspnea by the Modified Borg dyspnea scale was the primary outcome. Data were analyzed with parametric or nonparametric statistical tests, and generalized estimating equations with an identity link function were used to analyze differences in the two groups. Statistical significance was assumed at an unadjusted two-sided alpha value of 0.05.

Results

Participants’ mean age was 63.2 (SD, 9.30) years, and 39 (65.0%) reported active tobacco use. Patients’ age, sex, race, smoking history, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, supplemental oxygen requirements, and length of hospital stay were similar in the two groups (P > .05 for all). Patients receiving formoterol/revefenacin had similar Modified Borg dyspnea scores (P = .95) and required fewer total drug doses (P < .001), but there was a nonsignificant trend for more frequent rescue treatments (P = .08) compared with those receiving albuterol/ipratropium. There were no serious adverse events or treatment failures in either group.

Interpretation

Our findings indicate that in nonventilated hospitalized patients with exacerbations of COPD, the institution of nebulized formoterol/revefenacin in combination within 24 to 36 hours of hospital admission provided convenient dosing and required fewer drug doses to achieve comparable efficacy and safety with the standard short-acting nebulized albuterol/ipratropium combination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信