网络平台销售模式在回收渠道选择中的作用:利润与环境影响的博弈论分析

IF 9.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Zhaowei Miao, Hengming Peng, Yongquan Lan
{"title":"网络平台销售模式在回收渠道选择中的作用:利润与环境影响的博弈论分析","authors":"Zhaowei Miao,&nbsp;Hengming Peng,&nbsp;Yongquan Lan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, we develop a game theoretical model to investigate the effects of an online platform’s choice between selling modes (reselling and agency selling) on the manufacturer’s recycling channel selection when the online platform not only acts as a marketplace provider but also serves as a recycler. We find that the manufacturer should adopt agency selling (reselling) when the agency fee is low (high) and recycle used products directly from consumers under agency selling. When the agency fee is moderate, there is a Pareto improvement zone in the supply chain system. Our study also indicates that, surprisingly, as recycling cost decreases or consumers become less price-sensitive, the online platform may be induced to offer agency selling rather than reselling. The increased total profit further expands the “win-win” region, especially when compared to a scenario without remanufacturing. This implies that the induction effect becomes more pronounced, and that a Boxed Pig Game equilibrium (either the manufacturer or the online platform) may arise under agency selling. Furthermore, from an environmental impact perspective, we find that a higher return rate does not necessarily result in better environmental outcomes. Reselling always presents a conflict between economic and environmental goals, but agency selling allows for their coordination. More interestingly, it is insightful to show that the improvement of the triple bottom line outcome is achievable under agency selling when recycling costs, agency fees, and remanufacturing emissions are low as compared to reselling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"280 ","pages":"Article 109471"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of online platform selling mode in recycling channel selection: A game-theoretic analysis of profit and environmental impact\",\"authors\":\"Zhaowei Miao,&nbsp;Hengming Peng,&nbsp;Yongquan Lan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this paper, we develop a game theoretical model to investigate the effects of an online platform’s choice between selling modes (reselling and agency selling) on the manufacturer’s recycling channel selection when the online platform not only acts as a marketplace provider but also serves as a recycler. We find that the manufacturer should adopt agency selling (reselling) when the agency fee is low (high) and recycle used products directly from consumers under agency selling. When the agency fee is moderate, there is a Pareto improvement zone in the supply chain system. Our study also indicates that, surprisingly, as recycling cost decreases or consumers become less price-sensitive, the online platform may be induced to offer agency selling rather than reselling. The increased total profit further expands the “win-win” region, especially when compared to a scenario without remanufacturing. This implies that the induction effect becomes more pronounced, and that a Boxed Pig Game equilibrium (either the manufacturer or the online platform) may arise under agency selling. Furthermore, from an environmental impact perspective, we find that a higher return rate does not necessarily result in better environmental outcomes. Reselling always presents a conflict between economic and environmental goals, but agency selling allows for their coordination. More interestingly, it is insightful to show that the improvement of the triple bottom line outcome is achievable under agency selling when recycling costs, agency fees, and remanufacturing emissions are low as compared to reselling.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Production Economics\",\"volume\":\"280 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Production Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527324003281\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527324003281","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文建立了一个博弈论模型,研究了当网络平台既充当市场提供者又充当回收者时,网络平台在销售模式(转售和代理销售)之间的选择对制造商回收渠道选择的影响。我们发现,当代理费较低(较高)时,制造商应采取代理销售(转售)的方式,而在代理销售的情况下,制造商应直接从消费者那里回收二手产品。当代理费用适中时,供应链系统存在帕累托改善区。我们的研究还表明,令人惊讶的是,随着回收成本的降低或消费者对价格的敏感度降低,在线平台可能会被诱导提供代理销售而不是转售。增加的总利润进一步扩大了“双赢”区域,特别是与没有再制造的情况相比。这意味着诱导效应变得更加明显,并且在代理销售下可能出现盒装猪游戏均衡(无论是制造商还是在线平台)。此外,从环境影响的角度来看,我们发现更高的回报率并不一定导致更好的环境结果。转售总是在经济和环境目标之间产生冲突,但代理销售允许它们协调。更有趣的是,有深刻的见解表明,当回收成本、代理费和再制造排放比转售低时,代理销售可以实现三重底线结果的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of online platform selling mode in recycling channel selection: A game-theoretic analysis of profit and environmental impact
In this paper, we develop a game theoretical model to investigate the effects of an online platform’s choice between selling modes (reselling and agency selling) on the manufacturer’s recycling channel selection when the online platform not only acts as a marketplace provider but also serves as a recycler. We find that the manufacturer should adopt agency selling (reselling) when the agency fee is low (high) and recycle used products directly from consumers under agency selling. When the agency fee is moderate, there is a Pareto improvement zone in the supply chain system. Our study also indicates that, surprisingly, as recycling cost decreases or consumers become less price-sensitive, the online platform may be induced to offer agency selling rather than reselling. The increased total profit further expands the “win-win” region, especially when compared to a scenario without remanufacturing. This implies that the induction effect becomes more pronounced, and that a Boxed Pig Game equilibrium (either the manufacturer or the online platform) may arise under agency selling. Furthermore, from an environmental impact perspective, we find that a higher return rate does not necessarily result in better environmental outcomes. Reselling always presents a conflict between economic and environmental goals, but agency selling allows for their coordination. More interestingly, it is insightful to show that the improvement of the triple bottom line outcome is achievable under agency selling when recycling costs, agency fees, and remanufacturing emissions are low as compared to reselling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Production Economics
International Journal of Production Economics 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
266
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信