单孔腹膜后部分肾切除术的低前路入路:技术和结果

Shirin Razdan , Laura Zuluaga , Burak Ucpinar , Ketan K Badani
{"title":"单孔腹膜后部分肾切除术的低前路入路:技术和结果","authors":"Shirin Razdan ,&nbsp;Laura Zuluaga ,&nbsp;Burak Ucpinar ,&nbsp;Ketan K Badani","doi":"10.1016/j.urolvj.2024.100311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Single Port (SP) robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) can be performed via retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approach. We aim to describe low anterior access (LAA) with outcomes and compare outcomes to lateral flank approach (LFA).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent SP retroperitoneal RPN from 2018 -2023 as part of a large multi-institute collaboration (SPARC). Baseline demographic, clinical, tumor-specific characteristics, and perioperative outcomes were compared using χ2, <em>t</em>-test, Fisher exact test, and Mann–Whitney U test. Multivariable analyses were conducted using robust and logistic regressions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 70 patients underwent SP retroperitoneal RPN, with 44 undergoing LAA. The LAA group exhibited significantly lower median RENAL scores (8 vs. 5, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and more varied tumor locations (<em>p</em> = 0.002). When controlling for other variables, LAA was associated with shorter ischemia time (<em>p</em> = 0.005) than LFA, but there was no significant difference in operative time (<em>p</em> = 0.348) and length of stay (<em>p</em> = 0.122).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both LAA and LFA are acceptable approaches for SP retroperitoneal RPN with comparable perioperative outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":92972,"journal":{"name":"Urology video journal","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low anterior access for single port (SP) retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: Technique and outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Shirin Razdan ,&nbsp;Laura Zuluaga ,&nbsp;Burak Ucpinar ,&nbsp;Ketan K Badani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolvj.2024.100311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Single Port (SP) robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) can be performed via retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approach. We aim to describe low anterior access (LAA) with outcomes and compare outcomes to lateral flank approach (LFA).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent SP retroperitoneal RPN from 2018 -2023 as part of a large multi-institute collaboration (SPARC). Baseline demographic, clinical, tumor-specific characteristics, and perioperative outcomes were compared using χ2, <em>t</em>-test, Fisher exact test, and Mann–Whitney U test. Multivariable analyses were conducted using robust and logistic regressions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 70 patients underwent SP retroperitoneal RPN, with 44 undergoing LAA. The LAA group exhibited significantly lower median RENAL scores (8 vs. 5, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and more varied tumor locations (<em>p</em> = 0.002). When controlling for other variables, LAA was associated with shorter ischemia time (<em>p</em> = 0.005) than LFA, but there was no significant difference in operative time (<em>p</em> = 0.348) and length of stay (<em>p</em> = 0.122).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both LAA and LFA are acceptable approaches for SP retroperitoneal RPN with comparable perioperative outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology video journal\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology video journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590089724000501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology video journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590089724000501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

单口(SP)机器人部分肾切除术(RPN)可以通过腹膜后和经腹膜入路进行。我们的目的是描述低前路入路(LAA)的结果,并比较侧翼入路(LFA)的结果。材料和方法作为大型多机构合作(SPARC)的一部分,我们对2018 -2023年接受SP腹膜后RPN的患者进行了回顾性研究。采用χ2、t检验、Fisher精确检验和Mann-Whitney U检验比较基线人口学、临床、肿瘤特异性特征和围手术期结局。采用稳健回归和逻辑回归进行多变量分析。结果70例患者行SP腹膜后RPN, 44例行LAA。LAA组肾评分中位数明显降低(8比5,p <;0.001)和更多不同的肿瘤位置(p = 0.002)。在控制其他变量的情况下,LAA与LFA相比缺血时间更短(p = 0.005),但在手术时间(p = 0.348)和住院时间(p = 0.122)方面差异无统计学意义。结论LAA和LFA均是治疗SP腹膜后RPN的可行入路,围手术期预后相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low anterior access for single port (SP) retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: Technique and outcomes

Introduction

Single Port (SP) robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) can be performed via retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approach. We aim to describe low anterior access (LAA) with outcomes and compare outcomes to lateral flank approach (LFA).

Materials and Methods

We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent SP retroperitoneal RPN from 2018 -2023 as part of a large multi-institute collaboration (SPARC). Baseline demographic, clinical, tumor-specific characteristics, and perioperative outcomes were compared using χ2, t-test, Fisher exact test, and Mann–Whitney U test. Multivariable analyses were conducted using robust and logistic regressions.

Results

A total of 70 patients underwent SP retroperitoneal RPN, with 44 undergoing LAA. The LAA group exhibited significantly lower median RENAL scores (8 vs. 5, p < 0.001) and more varied tumor locations (p = 0.002). When controlling for other variables, LAA was associated with shorter ischemia time (p = 0.005) than LFA, but there was no significant difference in operative time (p = 0.348) and length of stay (p = 0.122).

Conclusion

Both LAA and LFA are acceptable approaches for SP retroperitoneal RPN with comparable perioperative outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urology video journal
Urology video journal Nephrology, Urology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信