Shirin Razdan , Laura Zuluaga , Burak Ucpinar , Ketan K Badani
{"title":"单孔腹膜后部分肾切除术的低前路入路:技术和结果","authors":"Shirin Razdan , Laura Zuluaga , Burak Ucpinar , Ketan K Badani","doi":"10.1016/j.urolvj.2024.100311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Single Port (SP) robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) can be performed via retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approach. We aim to describe low anterior access (LAA) with outcomes and compare outcomes to lateral flank approach (LFA).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent SP retroperitoneal RPN from 2018 -2023 as part of a large multi-institute collaboration (SPARC). Baseline demographic, clinical, tumor-specific characteristics, and perioperative outcomes were compared using χ2, <em>t</em>-test, Fisher exact test, and Mann–Whitney U test. Multivariable analyses were conducted using robust and logistic regressions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 70 patients underwent SP retroperitoneal RPN, with 44 undergoing LAA. The LAA group exhibited significantly lower median RENAL scores (8 vs. 5, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and more varied tumor locations (<em>p</em> = 0.002). When controlling for other variables, LAA was associated with shorter ischemia time (<em>p</em> = 0.005) than LFA, but there was no significant difference in operative time (<em>p</em> = 0.348) and length of stay (<em>p</em> = 0.122).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both LAA and LFA are acceptable approaches for SP retroperitoneal RPN with comparable perioperative outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":92972,"journal":{"name":"Urology video journal","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low anterior access for single port (SP) retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: Technique and outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Shirin Razdan , Laura Zuluaga , Burak Ucpinar , Ketan K Badani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolvj.2024.100311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Single Port (SP) robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) can be performed via retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approach. We aim to describe low anterior access (LAA) with outcomes and compare outcomes to lateral flank approach (LFA).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent SP retroperitoneal RPN from 2018 -2023 as part of a large multi-institute collaboration (SPARC). Baseline demographic, clinical, tumor-specific characteristics, and perioperative outcomes were compared using χ2, <em>t</em>-test, Fisher exact test, and Mann–Whitney U test. Multivariable analyses were conducted using robust and logistic regressions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 70 patients underwent SP retroperitoneal RPN, with 44 undergoing LAA. The LAA group exhibited significantly lower median RENAL scores (8 vs. 5, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and more varied tumor locations (<em>p</em> = 0.002). When controlling for other variables, LAA was associated with shorter ischemia time (<em>p</em> = 0.005) than LFA, but there was no significant difference in operative time (<em>p</em> = 0.348) and length of stay (<em>p</em> = 0.122).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both LAA and LFA are acceptable approaches for SP retroperitoneal RPN with comparable perioperative outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology video journal\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology video journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590089724000501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology video journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590089724000501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Low anterior access for single port (SP) retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy: Technique and outcomes
Introduction
Single Port (SP) robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) can be performed via retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approach. We aim to describe low anterior access (LAA) with outcomes and compare outcomes to lateral flank approach (LFA).
Materials and Methods
We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent SP retroperitoneal RPN from 2018 -2023 as part of a large multi-institute collaboration (SPARC). Baseline demographic, clinical, tumor-specific characteristics, and perioperative outcomes were compared using χ2, t-test, Fisher exact test, and Mann–Whitney U test. Multivariable analyses were conducted using robust and logistic regressions.
Results
A total of 70 patients underwent SP retroperitoneal RPN, with 44 undergoing LAA. The LAA group exhibited significantly lower median RENAL scores (8 vs. 5, p < 0.001) and more varied tumor locations (p = 0.002). When controlling for other variables, LAA was associated with shorter ischemia time (p = 0.005) than LFA, but there was no significant difference in operative time (p = 0.348) and length of stay (p = 0.122).
Conclusion
Both LAA and LFA are acceptable approaches for SP retroperitoneal RPN with comparable perioperative outcomes.