结肠直肠专业培训:通过西班牙结肠直肠协会青年小组进行横向队列研究

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Tamara Fernández-Miguel , Óscar Cano-Valderrama , Marta Paniagua García-Señorans , Alba Correa Bonito , Emilio Peña Ros , María Luisa Reyes-Díaz , Carlos Cerdán-Santacruz , Grupo Joven de la Asociación Española de Coloproctología (GJ-AECP): Grupo de trabajo sobre formación especializada
{"title":"结肠直肠专业培训:通过西班牙结肠直肠协会青年小组进行横向队列研究","authors":"Tamara Fernández-Miguel ,&nbsp;Óscar Cano-Valderrama ,&nbsp;Marta Paniagua García-Señorans ,&nbsp;Alba Correa Bonito ,&nbsp;Emilio Peña Ros ,&nbsp;María Luisa Reyes-Díaz ,&nbsp;Carlos Cerdán-Santacruz ,&nbsp;Grupo Joven de la Asociación Española de Coloproctología (GJ-AECP): Grupo de trabajo sobre formación especializada","doi":"10.1016/j.ciresp.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Specific training at surgical super-specialities and its objective evaluation is a challenge nowadays in order to measure the potential benefits that it might add.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>An online survey addressed by the <em>Grupo Joven de la Asociación Española de Coloproctología</em> has been performed in order to evaluate the level of formation achieved specifically at colorectal surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred twenty-eight surgeons participated, representing 81 colorectal surgery units. Mean satisfaction after the period of formation was moderate to high in 84% of the ones polled. The main points of improvement were the realization of advanced surgical techniques (52%) and academic questions (45%). The big part of the respondents has performed simple proctologic procedures (98%) and oncological open colic resections (100%) during their training period, observing the scarcity of related pelvic floor procedures (20%) and diagnosis techniques (10-45%). Scientific production (31.5%) and presentation of studies at congresses (82.8%) have been moderated. No differences between accredited units and non-accredited units have been observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Specific formation in colorectal surgery is appropriate, with a high level of simple procedures and open surgery performed by personal at formation. In view of these results, it seems logical to think that even though is necessary a progress in the formation of minimal invasive and diagnosis techniques.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50690,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia Espanola","volume":"102 12","pages":"Pages 658-666"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formación específica en coloproctología: estudio de cohortes transversal a través del Grupo Joven de la Asociación Española de Coloproctología\",\"authors\":\"Tamara Fernández-Miguel ,&nbsp;Óscar Cano-Valderrama ,&nbsp;Marta Paniagua García-Señorans ,&nbsp;Alba Correa Bonito ,&nbsp;Emilio Peña Ros ,&nbsp;María Luisa Reyes-Díaz ,&nbsp;Carlos Cerdán-Santacruz ,&nbsp;Grupo Joven de la Asociación Española de Coloproctología (GJ-AECP): Grupo de trabajo sobre formación especializada\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ciresp.2024.09.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Specific training at surgical super-specialities and its objective evaluation is a challenge nowadays in order to measure the potential benefits that it might add.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>An online survey addressed by the <em>Grupo Joven de la Asociación Española de Coloproctología</em> has been performed in order to evaluate the level of formation achieved specifically at colorectal surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>One hundred twenty-eight surgeons participated, representing 81 colorectal surgery units. Mean satisfaction after the period of formation was moderate to high in 84% of the ones polled. The main points of improvement were the realization of advanced surgical techniques (52%) and academic questions (45%). The big part of the respondents has performed simple proctologic procedures (98%) and oncological open colic resections (100%) during their training period, observing the scarcity of related pelvic floor procedures (20%) and diagnosis techniques (10-45%). Scientific production (31.5%) and presentation of studies at congresses (82.8%) have been moderated. No differences between accredited units and non-accredited units have been observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Specific formation in colorectal surgery is appropriate, with a high level of simple procedures and open surgery performed by personal at formation. In view of these results, it seems logical to think that even though is necessary a progress in the formation of minimal invasive and diagnosis techniques.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cirugia Espanola\",\"volume\":\"102 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 658-666\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cirugia Espanola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009739X24002252\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia Espanola","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009739X24002252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了衡量其可能增加的潜在好处,外科超级专业的特定培训及其客观评估是当今的一项挑战。材料和方法由Joven de la Asociación Española de Coloproctología小组进行的一项在线调查已进行,以评估结直肠手术中具体实现的形成水平。结果来自81个结直肠外科单位的128名外科医生参与了调查。在84%的被调查者中,形成期后的平均满意度为中等到较高。改善的主要点是实现先进的手术技术(52%)和学术问题(45%)。大部分受访者在培训期间进行了简单的直肠外科手术(98%)和肿瘤开放性结肠切除术(100%),观察到相关盆底手术(20%)和诊断技术(10-45%)的缺乏。科学成果(31.5%)和在大会上的研究报告(82.8%)得到了缓和。认可单位与非认可单位之间并无差异。结论在结直肠手术中采用特异性成形术是合适的,可采用高水平的简易手术和个人成形术进行开放性手术。鉴于这些结果,认为微创和诊断技术的形成仍有必要取得进展似乎是合乎逻辑的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Formación específica en coloproctología: estudio de cohortes transversal a través del Grupo Joven de la Asociación Española de Coloproctología

Formación específica en coloproctología: estudio de cohortes transversal a través del Grupo Joven de la Asociación Española de Coloproctología

Introduction

Specific training at surgical super-specialities and its objective evaluation is a challenge nowadays in order to measure the potential benefits that it might add.

Material and methods

An online survey addressed by the Grupo Joven de la Asociación Española de Coloproctología has been performed in order to evaluate the level of formation achieved specifically at colorectal surgery.

Results

One hundred twenty-eight surgeons participated, representing 81 colorectal surgery units. Mean satisfaction after the period of formation was moderate to high in 84% of the ones polled. The main points of improvement were the realization of advanced surgical techniques (52%) and academic questions (45%). The big part of the respondents has performed simple proctologic procedures (98%) and oncological open colic resections (100%) during their training period, observing the scarcity of related pelvic floor procedures (20%) and diagnosis techniques (10-45%). Scientific production (31.5%) and presentation of studies at congresses (82.8%) have been moderated. No differences between accredited units and non-accredited units have been observed.

Conclusions

Specific formation in colorectal surgery is appropriate, with a high level of simple procedures and open surgery performed by personal at formation. In view of these results, it seems logical to think that even though is necessary a progress in the formation of minimal invasive and diagnosis techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cirugia Espanola
Cirugia Espanola SURGERY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
21.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Cirugía Española, an official body of the Asociación Española de Cirujanos (Spanish Association of Surgeons), will consider original articles, reviews, editorials, special articles, scientific letters, letters to the editor, and medical images for publication; all of these will be submitted to an anonymous external peer review process. There is also the possibility of accepting book reviews of recent publications related to General and Digestive Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信