再看定性研究中的饱和概念

IF 3.1 Q1 NURSING
Bonnie Mowinski Jennings, Katherine A. Yeager
{"title":"再看定性研究中的饱和概念","authors":"Bonnie Mowinski Jennings,&nbsp;Katherine A. Yeager","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The term saturation is used ubiquitously in reports of qualitative research. The term is often used, however, as a throw-away line, sans definition, rationale, or explanation of the process. Consequently, there remains a question about what is meant when saturation is used.</div><div>The concept of saturation originated in grounded theory. Achieving theoretical saturation is one of the tenets of grounded theory. Over time, this specific and singular term has migrated to a general term that reflects various types of saturation such as code, data, theme, and meaning saturation. There is a lack of clarity among saturation types and a lack of transparency in reporting what is meant by saturation and how it was achieved. There is also a question about the relevance of saturation to qualitative methodologies outside grounded theory.</div><div>In seeking to raise awareness of the issues surrounding the term saturation, in this discussion paper we offer a synopsis of the history and evolution of the term saturation, address the current conundrum about saturation in qualitative research, and examine the use of saturation in qualitative articles published in the six nursing journals with the highest journal impact factors. This re-view reflects the need to critically assess the status of saturation as it is used in nursing journals. Better definitions of terms are needed to assure consistency in language that will enhance understanding for the end user of qualitative research reports. Those conducting and assessing qualitative inquiries need clear understanding of what is appropriate for each qualitative methodology—saturation does not apply to some qualitative approaches.</div><div>Mentorship and teaching are at the heart of the saturation issue. Finding a mentor who is a solid methodologist may require nurses to reach out to individuals in other disciplines such as sociology, psychology, or anthropology. In the absence of a mentor, investigators conducting qualitative inquiry are urged to become well-versed in the methodology they believe is best suited to their question by turning to original sources written by well-trained methodologists. It is imperative that students who may become educators or researchers who then become reviewers and perhaps journal editors have a solid understanding of key qualitative concepts such as saturation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100298"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-viewing the concept of saturation in qualitative research\",\"authors\":\"Bonnie Mowinski Jennings,&nbsp;Katherine A. Yeager\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The term saturation is used ubiquitously in reports of qualitative research. The term is often used, however, as a throw-away line, sans definition, rationale, or explanation of the process. Consequently, there remains a question about what is meant when saturation is used.</div><div>The concept of saturation originated in grounded theory. Achieving theoretical saturation is one of the tenets of grounded theory. Over time, this specific and singular term has migrated to a general term that reflects various types of saturation such as code, data, theme, and meaning saturation. There is a lack of clarity among saturation types and a lack of transparency in reporting what is meant by saturation and how it was achieved. There is also a question about the relevance of saturation to qualitative methodologies outside grounded theory.</div><div>In seeking to raise awareness of the issues surrounding the term saturation, in this discussion paper we offer a synopsis of the history and evolution of the term saturation, address the current conundrum about saturation in qualitative research, and examine the use of saturation in qualitative articles published in the six nursing journals with the highest journal impact factors. This re-view reflects the need to critically assess the status of saturation as it is used in nursing journals. Better definitions of terms are needed to assure consistency in language that will enhance understanding for the end user of qualitative research reports. Those conducting and assessing qualitative inquiries need clear understanding of what is appropriate for each qualitative methodology—saturation does not apply to some qualitative approaches.</div><div>Mentorship and teaching are at the heart of the saturation issue. Finding a mentor who is a solid methodologist may require nurses to reach out to individuals in other disciplines such as sociology, psychology, or anthropology. In the absence of a mentor, investigators conducting qualitative inquiry are urged to become well-versed in the methodology they believe is best suited to their question by turning to original sources written by well-trained methodologists. It is imperative that students who may become educators or researchers who then become reviewers and perhaps journal editors have a solid understanding of key qualitative concepts such as saturation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X25000086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X25000086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“饱和”一词在定性研究报告中随处可见。然而,这个术语经常被当作一句随口而用,没有定义、理由或对过程的解释。因此,仍然存在一个问题,即当使用饱和时意味着什么。饱和的概念起源于扎根理论。达到理论饱和是扎根理论的原则之一。随着时间的推移,这个特定的、单一的术语已经转变为一个通用的术语,反映了各种类型的饱和,如代码、数据、主题和意义饱和。饱和类型之间缺乏明确性,在报告饱和意味着什么以及如何实现饱和方面缺乏透明度。还有一个关于饱和度与扎根理论之外的定性方法的相关性的问题。为了提高人们对“饱和”一词的认识,在本文中,我们概述了“饱和”一词的历史和演变,解决了目前定性研究中关于“饱和”的难题,并研究了在六种期刊影响因子最高的护理期刊上发表的定性文章中“饱和”一词的使用。这一回顾反映了需要批判性地评估饱和状态,因为它被用于护理期刊。需要更好地定义术语,以确保语言的一致性,从而提高定性研究报告的最终用户的理解。那些进行和评估定性调查的人需要清楚地了解什么是适合每种定性方法的——饱和并不适用于某些定性方法。指导和教学是饱和问题的核心。找一个有扎实的方法论的导师可能需要护士接触其他学科的人,比如社会学、心理学或人类学。在没有导师的情况下,进行定性调查的调查人员被敦促通过转向由训练有素的方法学家撰写的原始资料,精通他们认为最适合他们问题的方法。对于那些可能成为教育工作者或研究人员,进而成为审稿人和期刊编辑的学生来说,对饱和度等关键的定性概念有一个扎实的理解是非常必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-viewing the concept of saturation in qualitative research
The term saturation is used ubiquitously in reports of qualitative research. The term is often used, however, as a throw-away line, sans definition, rationale, or explanation of the process. Consequently, there remains a question about what is meant when saturation is used.
The concept of saturation originated in grounded theory. Achieving theoretical saturation is one of the tenets of grounded theory. Over time, this specific and singular term has migrated to a general term that reflects various types of saturation such as code, data, theme, and meaning saturation. There is a lack of clarity among saturation types and a lack of transparency in reporting what is meant by saturation and how it was achieved. There is also a question about the relevance of saturation to qualitative methodologies outside grounded theory.
In seeking to raise awareness of the issues surrounding the term saturation, in this discussion paper we offer a synopsis of the history and evolution of the term saturation, address the current conundrum about saturation in qualitative research, and examine the use of saturation in qualitative articles published in the six nursing journals with the highest journal impact factors. This re-view reflects the need to critically assess the status of saturation as it is used in nursing journals. Better definitions of terms are needed to assure consistency in language that will enhance understanding for the end user of qualitative research reports. Those conducting and assessing qualitative inquiries need clear understanding of what is appropriate for each qualitative methodology—saturation does not apply to some qualitative approaches.
Mentorship and teaching are at the heart of the saturation issue. Finding a mentor who is a solid methodologist may require nurses to reach out to individuals in other disciplines such as sociology, psychology, or anthropology. In the absence of a mentor, investigators conducting qualitative inquiry are urged to become well-versed in the methodology they believe is best suited to their question by turning to original sources written by well-trained methodologists. It is imperative that students who may become educators or researchers who then become reviewers and perhaps journal editors have a solid understanding of key qualitative concepts such as saturation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信