在澳大利亚急诊科设置儿科阑尾炎风险计算器(pARC)的验证

Alexander Howes , Sanjeev Khurana , Jennie Louise , Isabella Watts , Rebecca Linke , Amit Kochar
{"title":"在澳大利亚急诊科设置儿科阑尾炎风险计算器(pARC)的验证","authors":"Alexander Howes ,&nbsp;Sanjeev Khurana ,&nbsp;Jennie Louise ,&nbsp;Isabella Watts ,&nbsp;Rebecca Linke ,&nbsp;Amit Kochar","doi":"10.1016/j.yjpso.2025.100192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><div>Our objective is to assess the performance of the Paediatric Appendicitis risk calculator (pARC) in quantifying the risk of appendicitis, in an Australian tertiary emergency department (ED) and to compare its performance with that of the Paediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS) and Alvarado score in predicting risk of appendicitis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted this prospective, observational cohort study from July 2021 to October 2022 in the Women's and Children's Hospital (WCH) ED in Adelaide, South Australia. Patients aged 5 to 18 presenting with abdominal pain ≤120 h, where appendicitis was a differential diagnosis, were eligible for enrolment. Our primary outcome was the histopathological diagnosis of appendicitis within 14 days of initial presentation. We reported performance characteristics and secondary outcomes by pARC risk strata and compared the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves of the PAS, Alvarado and pARC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We enrolled 675 patients with a mean age of 11.93 years, 51 % were female. Appendicitis was histologically diagnosed in 29.33 % of patients, with 13.6 % having perforated appendicitis. 51 % of patients had very low (&lt;5 %) or low (5 % to 14 %) predicted risk, 40.3 % had intermediate risk (15 % to 84 %), and 6.5 % had high risk (&gt;85 %). In the very-low- and low-risk groups, 6.4 % and 11 % of patients had appendicitis, respectively. The AUROC was 0.852 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.820 to 0.885) for the pARC compared with 0.80 (95 % CI 0.77 to 0.84) for the PAS, and 0.73 (95 % CI 0.69, 0.78) for Alvarado.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The pARC score has been validated as an appendicitis risk calculator which is as reliable as previous studies, in the study population, whilst outperforming the PAS and Alvarado scores.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the paediatric appendicitis risk calculator (pARC) in an Australian emergency department setting\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Howes ,&nbsp;Sanjeev Khurana ,&nbsp;Jennie Louise ,&nbsp;Isabella Watts ,&nbsp;Rebecca Linke ,&nbsp;Amit Kochar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yjpso.2025.100192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><div>Our objective is to assess the performance of the Paediatric Appendicitis risk calculator (pARC) in quantifying the risk of appendicitis, in an Australian tertiary emergency department (ED) and to compare its performance with that of the Paediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS) and Alvarado score in predicting risk of appendicitis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted this prospective, observational cohort study from July 2021 to October 2022 in the Women's and Children's Hospital (WCH) ED in Adelaide, South Australia. Patients aged 5 to 18 presenting with abdominal pain ≤120 h, where appendicitis was a differential diagnosis, were eligible for enrolment. Our primary outcome was the histopathological diagnosis of appendicitis within 14 days of initial presentation. We reported performance characteristics and secondary outcomes by pARC risk strata and compared the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves of the PAS, Alvarado and pARC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We enrolled 675 patients with a mean age of 11.93 years, 51 % were female. Appendicitis was histologically diagnosed in 29.33 % of patients, with 13.6 % having perforated appendicitis. 51 % of patients had very low (&lt;5 %) or low (5 % to 14 %) predicted risk, 40.3 % had intermediate risk (15 % to 84 %), and 6.5 % had high risk (&gt;85 %). In the very-low- and low-risk groups, 6.4 % and 11 % of patients had appendicitis, respectively. The AUROC was 0.852 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.820 to 0.885) for the pARC compared with 0.80 (95 % CI 0.77 to 0.84) for the PAS, and 0.73 (95 % CI 0.69, 0.78) for Alvarado.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The pARC score has been validated as an appendicitis risk calculator which is as reliable as previous studies, in the study population, whilst outperforming the PAS and Alvarado scores.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949711625000012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949711625000012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:我们的目的是评估儿科阑尾炎风险计算器(pARC)在量化澳大利亚三级急诊科(ED)阑尾炎风险方面的表现,并将其与儿科阑尾炎评分(PAS)和Alvarado评分在预测阑尾炎风险方面的表现进行比较。方法:我们于2021年7月至2022年10月在南澳大利亚阿德莱德的妇女儿童医院(WCH) ED进行了这项前瞻性、观察性队列研究。年龄在5到18岁之间,腹痛≤120小时,阑尾炎是鉴别诊断,符合入组条件。我们的主要结果是阑尾炎在14天内的组织病理学诊断。我们报告了pARC风险层的表现特征和次要结局,并比较了PAS、Alvarado和pARC的受试者操作者特征(ROC)曲线。结果纳入675例患者,平均年龄11.93岁,女性占51%。组织学诊断为阑尾炎的患者占29.33%,其中13.6%为穿孔性阑尾炎。51%的患者预测风险极低(5%)或低(5% - 14%),40.3%为中等风险(15% - 84%),6.5%为高风险(85%)。在极低风险组和低风险组中,分别有6.4%和11%的患者患有阑尾炎。pARC的AUROC为0.852(95%可信区间(CI) 0.820至0.885),PAS为0.80 (95% CI 0.77至0.84),Alvarado为0.73 (95% CI 0.69, 0.78)。结论:在研究人群中,pARC评分已被验证为阑尾炎风险计算器,与以前的研究一样可靠,同时优于PAS和Alvarado评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the paediatric appendicitis risk calculator (pARC) in an Australian emergency department setting

Study objective

Our objective is to assess the performance of the Paediatric Appendicitis risk calculator (pARC) in quantifying the risk of appendicitis, in an Australian tertiary emergency department (ED) and to compare its performance with that of the Paediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS) and Alvarado score in predicting risk of appendicitis.

Methods

We conducted this prospective, observational cohort study from July 2021 to October 2022 in the Women's and Children's Hospital (WCH) ED in Adelaide, South Australia. Patients aged 5 to 18 presenting with abdominal pain ≤120 h, where appendicitis was a differential diagnosis, were eligible for enrolment. Our primary outcome was the histopathological diagnosis of appendicitis within 14 days of initial presentation. We reported performance characteristics and secondary outcomes by pARC risk strata and compared the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves of the PAS, Alvarado and pARC.

Results

We enrolled 675 patients with a mean age of 11.93 years, 51 % were female. Appendicitis was histologically diagnosed in 29.33 % of patients, with 13.6 % having perforated appendicitis. 51 % of patients had very low (<5 %) or low (5 % to 14 %) predicted risk, 40.3 % had intermediate risk (15 % to 84 %), and 6.5 % had high risk (>85 %). In the very-low- and low-risk groups, 6.4 % and 11 % of patients had appendicitis, respectively. The AUROC was 0.852 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.820 to 0.885) for the pARC compared with 0.80 (95 % CI 0.77 to 0.84) for the PAS, and 0.73 (95 % CI 0.69, 0.78) for Alvarado.

Conclusion

The pARC score has been validated as an appendicitis risk calculator which is as reliable as previous studies, in the study population, whilst outperforming the PAS and Alvarado scores.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信