常染色体显性多囊肾病的现场与24小时尿液渗透压测定:一项诊断试验研究

IF 3.4 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ayub Akbari , Sriram Sriperumbuduri , Shreepryia Mangalgi , Vijay Joshi , Manish Sood , Amos Buh , Mohan Biyani , Christopher McCudden , Gregory L. Hundemer , Pierre Antoine Brown
{"title":"常染色体显性多囊肾病的现场与24小时尿液渗透压测定:一项诊断试验研究","authors":"Ayub Akbari ,&nbsp;Sriram Sriperumbuduri ,&nbsp;Shreepryia Mangalgi ,&nbsp;Vijay Joshi ,&nbsp;Manish Sood ,&nbsp;Amos Buh ,&nbsp;Mohan Biyani ,&nbsp;Christopher McCudden ,&nbsp;Gregory L. Hundemer ,&nbsp;Pierre Antoine Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2025.100965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><div>Arginine vasopressin (AVP) is an established driver of cyst growth in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Urine osmolality (osm) measures are surrogate markers of AVP activity. Both 24-hour and spot urine samples are used as indicators of AVP suppression. The agreement between these 2 measurements remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Study Population</h3><div>Three hundred and forty-nine patients with ADPKD with 839 urine samples from a tertiary care center.</div></div><div><h3>Selection Criteria for Study</h3><div>Patients with ADPKD with records of spot and 24-hour urine measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Consecutive patients’ data from January 2018 to March 2023 were extracted from the quality assurance database of The Ottawa Hospital Cystic Kidney Disease Clinic.</div></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><div>Discordance assessed at target urine osmolality of 250 and 270<!--> <!-->mmol/kg. Agreement assessed by Bland-Altman plots. The percentage of patients with difference in osmolality between the 2 measures for cutoff points of<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->50,<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->100,<!--> <!-->&gt;150, and<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->200<!--> <!-->mmol/kg was calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean 24-hour urine osm was 364<!--> <!-->mmol/kg, and the mean spot urine osm was 424 mosm/kg. Mean age of 46 years, 52% females, and 47 (13.5%) were on tolvaptan. Overall, in comparing spot urine osm to 24-hour urine osm, the discordance at 250 and 270<!--> <!-->mmol/kg was 24% with poor agreement on Bland-Altman plots. The differences between the 2 measures at varying cutoff points were 53.9% at 50<!--> <!-->mmol/kg, 35.8% at 100<!--> <!-->mmol/kg, 24.1% at 150<!--> <!-->mmol/kg, and 16.1% at 200<!--> <!-->mmol/kg. Results were similar when only a single measurement from each patient was used for analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Total of 29% of patients did not have concurrent spot urine osmolality and 24-hour urine osmolality. The study was conducted at a single center. Limited number of patients were on tolvaptan.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In adults with ADPKD, important differences exist between the 24-hour urine osmolality and spot urine osmolality that preclude interchangeable use. The method employed may impact clinical decision-making. More research is needed to determine, which urine osm should be used when assessing AVP suppression.</div></div><div><h3>Plain Language Summary</h3><div>Urine osmolality measures are used clinically to dose tolvaptan in patients with adult polycystic kidney disease. We compared urine osmolality from 24-hour and spot urine samples. We found out that important differences exist between 24-hour and spot urine samples’ osmolality. The method employed to determine urine osmolality may impact clinical decision-making in the management of patients with adult polycystic kidney disease.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 100965"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spot Versus 24-Hour Urine Osmolality Measurement in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Diagnostic Test Study\",\"authors\":\"Ayub Akbari ,&nbsp;Sriram Sriperumbuduri ,&nbsp;Shreepryia Mangalgi ,&nbsp;Vijay Joshi ,&nbsp;Manish Sood ,&nbsp;Amos Buh ,&nbsp;Mohan Biyani ,&nbsp;Christopher McCudden ,&nbsp;Gregory L. Hundemer ,&nbsp;Pierre Antoine Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xkme.2025.100965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><div>Arginine vasopressin (AVP) is an established driver of cyst growth in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Urine osmolality (osm) measures are surrogate markers of AVP activity. Both 24-hour and spot urine samples are used as indicators of AVP suppression. The agreement between these 2 measurements remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Study Population</h3><div>Three hundred and forty-nine patients with ADPKD with 839 urine samples from a tertiary care center.</div></div><div><h3>Selection Criteria for Study</h3><div>Patients with ADPKD with records of spot and 24-hour urine measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Consecutive patients’ data from January 2018 to March 2023 were extracted from the quality assurance database of The Ottawa Hospital Cystic Kidney Disease Clinic.</div></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><div>Discordance assessed at target urine osmolality of 250 and 270<!--> <!-->mmol/kg. Agreement assessed by Bland-Altman plots. The percentage of patients with difference in osmolality between the 2 measures for cutoff points of<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->50,<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->100,<!--> <!-->&gt;150, and<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->200<!--> <!-->mmol/kg was calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean 24-hour urine osm was 364<!--> <!-->mmol/kg, and the mean spot urine osm was 424 mosm/kg. Mean age of 46 years, 52% females, and 47 (13.5%) were on tolvaptan. Overall, in comparing spot urine osm to 24-hour urine osm, the discordance at 250 and 270<!--> <!-->mmol/kg was 24% with poor agreement on Bland-Altman plots. The differences between the 2 measures at varying cutoff points were 53.9% at 50<!--> <!-->mmol/kg, 35.8% at 100<!--> <!-->mmol/kg, 24.1% at 150<!--> <!-->mmol/kg, and 16.1% at 200<!--> <!-->mmol/kg. Results were similar when only a single measurement from each patient was used for analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Total of 29% of patients did not have concurrent spot urine osmolality and 24-hour urine osmolality. The study was conducted at a single center. Limited number of patients were on tolvaptan.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In adults with ADPKD, important differences exist between the 24-hour urine osmolality and spot urine osmolality that preclude interchangeable use. The method employed may impact clinical decision-making. More research is needed to determine, which urine osm should be used when assessing AVP suppression.</div></div><div><h3>Plain Language Summary</h3><div>Urine osmolality measures are used clinically to dose tolvaptan in patients with adult polycystic kidney disease. We compared urine osmolality from 24-hour and spot urine samples. We found out that important differences exist between 24-hour and spot urine samples’ osmolality. The method employed to determine urine osmolality may impact clinical decision-making in the management of patients with adult polycystic kidney disease.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney Medicine\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100965\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059525000019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059525000019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基本原理及目的精氨酸加压素(AVP)是常染色体显性多囊肾病(ADPKD)中囊肿生长的驱动因素。尿渗透压(osm)测量是AVP活性的替代标记。24小时尿样和现场尿样作为AVP抑制的指标。这两种测量结果之间的一致性尚不清楚。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。设置,研究人群:来自三级医疗中心的349例ADPKD患者和839例尿液样本。有现场和24小时尿液测量记录的ADPKD患者的选择标准。数据提取从渥太华医院囊性肾病诊所的质量保证数据库中提取2018年1月至2023年3月的连续患者数据。分析方法:在目标尿渗透压为250和270 mmol/kg时评估不一致。由Bland-Altman地块评估的协议。两种测量方法之间渗透压差异的患者百分比;50岁的祝辞100, >150, >;计算200 mmol/kg。结果24小时尿氧饱和度平均值为364 mmol/kg,现场尿氧饱和度平均值为424 mmol/kg。平均年龄46岁,52%为女性,47例(13.5%)使用托伐普坦。总的来说,在比较现场尿氨氮和24小时尿氨氮时,250和270 mmol/kg时的不一致性为24%,Bland-Altman图的一致性较差。在不同临界值下,两种测量值在50 mmol/kg时差异为53.9%,100 mmol/kg时差异为35.8%,150 mmol/kg时差异为24.1%,200 mmol/kg时差异为16.1%。当仅使用每位患者的单一测量结果进行分析时,结果相似。总的来说,29%的患者没有并发的斑点尿渗透压和24小时尿渗透压。这项研究是在一个中心进行的。使用托伐普坦的患者数量有限。结论成人ADPKD患者24小时尿渗透压与点尿渗透压存在显著差异,不能互换使用。所采用的方法可能会影响临床决策。需要更多的研究来确定,在评估AVP抑制时应该使用哪种尿液osm。临床应用尿渗透压测定法对成人多囊肾病患者给予托伐普坦剂量。我们比较了24小时尿样和现场尿样的尿液渗透压。我们发现24小时尿样和现场尿样的渗透压存在重要差异。测定尿渗透压的方法可能影响成人多囊肾病患者治疗的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spot Versus 24-Hour Urine Osmolality Measurement in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Diagnostic Test Study

Rationale & Objective

Arginine vasopressin (AVP) is an established driver of cyst growth in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Urine osmolality (osm) measures are surrogate markers of AVP activity. Both 24-hour and spot urine samples are used as indicators of AVP suppression. The agreement between these 2 measurements remains unclear.

Study Design

A retrospective cohort study.

Setting & Study Population

Three hundred and forty-nine patients with ADPKD with 839 urine samples from a tertiary care center.

Selection Criteria for Study

Patients with ADPKD with records of spot and 24-hour urine measurements.

Data Extraction

Consecutive patients’ data from January 2018 to March 2023 were extracted from the quality assurance database of The Ottawa Hospital Cystic Kidney Disease Clinic.

Analytical Approach

Discordance assessed at target urine osmolality of 250 and 270 mmol/kg. Agreement assessed by Bland-Altman plots. The percentage of patients with difference in osmolality between the 2 measures for cutoff points of > 50, > 100, >150, and > 200 mmol/kg was calculated.

Results

The mean 24-hour urine osm was 364 mmol/kg, and the mean spot urine osm was 424 mosm/kg. Mean age of 46 years, 52% females, and 47 (13.5%) were on tolvaptan. Overall, in comparing spot urine osm to 24-hour urine osm, the discordance at 250 and 270 mmol/kg was 24% with poor agreement on Bland-Altman plots. The differences between the 2 measures at varying cutoff points were 53.9% at 50 mmol/kg, 35.8% at 100 mmol/kg, 24.1% at 150 mmol/kg, and 16.1% at 200 mmol/kg. Results were similar when only a single measurement from each patient was used for analysis.

Limitations

Total of 29% of patients did not have concurrent spot urine osmolality and 24-hour urine osmolality. The study was conducted at a single center. Limited number of patients were on tolvaptan.

Conclusions

In adults with ADPKD, important differences exist between the 24-hour urine osmolality and spot urine osmolality that preclude interchangeable use. The method employed may impact clinical decision-making. More research is needed to determine, which urine osm should be used when assessing AVP suppression.

Plain Language Summary

Urine osmolality measures are used clinically to dose tolvaptan in patients with adult polycystic kidney disease. We compared urine osmolality from 24-hour and spot urine samples. We found out that important differences exist between 24-hour and spot urine samples’ osmolality. The method employed to determine urine osmolality may impact clinical decision-making in the management of patients with adult polycystic kidney disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney Medicine
Kidney Medicine Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信