自动驾驶汽车时代无信号人行横道安全性评估

IF 8.2 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Andrea Avignone , Marco Bassani , Beatrice Borgogno , Brunella Caroleo , Silvia Chiusano , Federico Princiotto
{"title":"自动驾驶汽车时代无信号人行横道安全性评估","authors":"Andrea Avignone ,&nbsp;Marco Bassani ,&nbsp;Beatrice Borgogno ,&nbsp;Brunella Caroleo ,&nbsp;Silvia Chiusano ,&nbsp;Federico Princiotto","doi":"10.1016/j.compind.2025.104259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As autonomous vehicles are poised to enter public roadways, a major concern is their interaction with pedestrians. It requires attention and ability for pedestrians to interact correctly and for autonomous vehicles to detect pedestrians hence avoiding collisions. We propose a complete pipeline to collect, process and elaborate video data to quantitatively assess the possible occurrence of conflicts. It integrates computer vision techniques and a conflict detection system to evaluate these interactions by rigorously implementing the theoretical formulation of two primary metrics: Time-to-Collision (TTC) for the pre-event phase and Post Encroachment Time (PET) for the post-event phase. This study is conducted in a real-world setting with mixed traffic conditions to analyse the differences in pedestrian interactions with both human-operated and autonomous vehicles during daytime. The computation of conflict measures allowed us to identify possible conflicts and assess the safety at an unsignalized crossing, in which pedestrians are exposed to more risky conflicts. The results obtained show a higher incidence of more severe conflicts for interactions between pedestrians and human-operated vehicles, which highlights the caution taken in programming the autonomous vehicle.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55219,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Industry","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 104259"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating unsignalized crosswalk safety in the age of autonomous vehicles\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Avignone ,&nbsp;Marco Bassani ,&nbsp;Beatrice Borgogno ,&nbsp;Brunella Caroleo ,&nbsp;Silvia Chiusano ,&nbsp;Federico Princiotto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compind.2025.104259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As autonomous vehicles are poised to enter public roadways, a major concern is their interaction with pedestrians. It requires attention and ability for pedestrians to interact correctly and for autonomous vehicles to detect pedestrians hence avoiding collisions. We propose a complete pipeline to collect, process and elaborate video data to quantitatively assess the possible occurrence of conflicts. It integrates computer vision techniques and a conflict detection system to evaluate these interactions by rigorously implementing the theoretical formulation of two primary metrics: Time-to-Collision (TTC) for the pre-event phase and Post Encroachment Time (PET) for the post-event phase. This study is conducted in a real-world setting with mixed traffic conditions to analyse the differences in pedestrian interactions with both human-operated and autonomous vehicles during daytime. The computation of conflict measures allowed us to identify possible conflicts and assess the safety at an unsignalized crossing, in which pedestrians are exposed to more risky conflicts. The results obtained show a higher incidence of more severe conflicts for interactions between pedestrians and human-operated vehicles, which highlights the caution taken in programming the autonomous vehicle.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Industry\",\"volume\":\"167 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Industry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166361525000247\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Industry","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166361525000247","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着自动驾驶汽车准备进入公共道路,一个主要的问题是它们与行人的互动。这需要行人的注意力和正确互动的能力,以及自动驾驶汽车检测行人从而避免碰撞的能力。我们提出了一个完整的管道来收集、处理和细化视频数据,以定量评估可能发生的冲突。它集成了计算机视觉技术和冲突检测系统,通过严格实施两个主要指标的理论公式来评估这些相互作用:事件前阶段的碰撞时间(TTC)和事件后阶段的入侵后时间(PET)。本研究是在现实世界的混合交通条件下进行的,以分析白天行人与人工驾驶车辆和自动驾驶车辆互动的差异。冲突措施的计算使我们能够识别可能的冲突并评估无信号交叉口的安全性,行人在无信号交叉口面临更危险的冲突。研究结果显示,行人与人工驾驶车辆之间的互动发生更严重冲突的几率更高,这凸显了对自动驾驶车辆进行编程时需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating unsignalized crosswalk safety in the age of autonomous vehicles

Evaluating unsignalized crosswalk safety in the age of autonomous vehicles
As autonomous vehicles are poised to enter public roadways, a major concern is their interaction with pedestrians. It requires attention and ability for pedestrians to interact correctly and for autonomous vehicles to detect pedestrians hence avoiding collisions. We propose a complete pipeline to collect, process and elaborate video data to quantitatively assess the possible occurrence of conflicts. It integrates computer vision techniques and a conflict detection system to evaluate these interactions by rigorously implementing the theoretical formulation of two primary metrics: Time-to-Collision (TTC) for the pre-event phase and Post Encroachment Time (PET) for the post-event phase. This study is conducted in a real-world setting with mixed traffic conditions to analyse the differences in pedestrian interactions with both human-operated and autonomous vehicles during daytime. The computation of conflict measures allowed us to identify possible conflicts and assess the safety at an unsignalized crossing, in which pedestrians are exposed to more risky conflicts. The results obtained show a higher incidence of more severe conflicts for interactions between pedestrians and human-operated vehicles, which highlights the caution taken in programming the autonomous vehicle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers in Industry
Computers in Industry 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
152
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: The objective of Computers in Industry is to present original, high-quality, application-oriented research papers that: • Illuminate emerging trends and possibilities in the utilization of Information and Communication Technology in industry; • Establish connections or integrations across various technology domains within the expansive realm of computer applications for industry; • Foster connections or integrations across diverse application areas of ICT in industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信