IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Todd Molfenter, Jessica Vechinski, Jee-Seon Kim, Jingru Zhang, Lionel Meng, Jessica Tveit, Lynn Madden, Faye S Taxman
{"title":"Assessing the comparative effectiveness of ECHO and coaching implementation strategies in a jail/provider MOUD implementation trial.","authors":"Todd Molfenter, Jessica Vechinski, Jee-Seon Kim, Jingru Zhang, Lionel Meng, Jessica Tveit, Lynn Madden, Faye S Taxman","doi":"10.1186/s13012-025-01419-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For nearly two decades, it has been widely recognized that individuals in jail settings have a high prevalence of opioid use disorders (OUD) and are highly susceptible to fatal overdose upon their release. This setting provides a public health opportunity to address OUD with Medication for Opioid Use Disorders (MOUDs). Yet, 56% of jails do not provide MOUD, creating a pressing need for better implementation approaches in jail and the hand-off to the community. Two successful implementation strategies, NIATx external coaching and the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) case management telementoring model, were compared to address this persistent treatment gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 2 × 2 design compared high (n = 12) and low (n = 4) dose coaching with and without ECHO in a 12-month intervention and 12 M sustainability period. The national trial included 25 jails and 13 community-based partners. MOUD trends for buprenorphine, methadone, injectable naltrexone, and combined MOUD between the study arms were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Jail sizes ranged from 24% with < 100 and 24% with > 500 daily population, and community-based treatment providers ranged from 63% with < 50 and 7% with > 500 average monthly OUD intakes. New patient counts were found to significantly increase across the intervention phase for buprenorphine (p < .01) and combined MOUD (p < .01). Injectable naltrexone and methadone showed no consistent, significant gains. For sites with low coaching without ECHO, new patient counts for combined MOUD were predicted to increase by 47.44% during the intervention phase and 7.30% during the sustainability phase. ECHO demonstrated that MOUD use did not significantly increase compared to coaching across MOUDs in the intervention phase (p = .517). High- and low-dose coaching showed no significant differences in MOUD use during the intervention phase (p = .124).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Coaching emerged as a more effective implementation strategy than ECHO for increasing buprenorphine use in jail settings. In practice, ECHO sessions offered considerable overlap with coaching strategies. While high-dose coaching had greater gains for MOUDs overall than low-dose coaching, those gains were statistically insignificant, suggesting low-dose coaching to be more economical. To increase MOUD use in jail settings, jurisdictions should focus on new MOUDs so all three MOUDs are available and enhance the post-incarceration continuum of care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Name of registry: ClinicalTrials.gov.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04363320. Date of registration: 2020-07-30. URL of trial registry record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04363320?term=molfenter&rank=7 .</p>","PeriodicalId":54995,"journal":{"name":"Implementation Science","volume":"20 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-025-01419-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近二十年来,人们普遍认识到,监狱环境中的人患有阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的比例很高,并且在出狱后极易出现致命的用药过量。这种环境为利用阿片类药物使用失调(MOUDs)治疗 OUD 提供了公共卫生机会。然而,56% 的监狱不提供阿片类药物治疗,这就迫切需要在监狱和社区中采取更好的实施方法。我们比较了两种成功的实施策略,即 NIATx 外部辅导和社区医疗保健成果推广(ECHO)个案管理辅导模式,以解决这一长期存在的治疗差距:在为期 12 个月的干预期和 12 个月的持续期中,采用 2 × 2 设计比较了有 ECHO 和无 ECHO 的高剂量(n = 12)和低剂量(n = 4)辅导。全国性试验包括 25 所监狱和 13 个社区合作伙伴。评估了丁丙诺啡、美沙酮、注射用纳曲酮的 MOUD 趋势,以及各研究臂之间的综合 MOUD:监狱的规模从 24% 到 500 人不等,社区治疗机构的规模从 63% 到 500 人不等,平均每月接受 OUD 治疗。在整个干预阶段,丁丙诺啡的新患者人数明显增加(p 结论:在整个干预阶段,丁丙诺啡的新患者人数明显增加(p 结论:在整个干预阶段,丁丙诺啡的新患者人数明显增加(p):在监狱环境中增加丁丙诺啡的使用方面,辅导是比 ECHO 更有效的实施策略。在实践中,ECHO 课程与辅导策略有很大的重叠。虽然高剂量辅导在总体上比低剂量辅导对 MOUDs 有更大的收益,但这些收益在统计学上并不显著,这表明低剂量辅导更经济。为了提高MOUD在监狱环境中的使用率,司法管辖区应重点关注新的MOUD,以便提供所有三种MOUD,并加强入狱后的持续护理:登记处名称:试验登记:登记处名称:ClinicalTrials.gov.试验登记号:NCT04363320:NCT04363320.注册日期:2020-07-30。试验登记记录的网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04363320?term=molfenter&rank=7 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the comparative effectiveness of ECHO and coaching implementation strategies in a jail/provider MOUD implementation trial.

Background: For nearly two decades, it has been widely recognized that individuals in jail settings have a high prevalence of opioid use disorders (OUD) and are highly susceptible to fatal overdose upon their release. This setting provides a public health opportunity to address OUD with Medication for Opioid Use Disorders (MOUDs). Yet, 56% of jails do not provide MOUD, creating a pressing need for better implementation approaches in jail and the hand-off to the community. Two successful implementation strategies, NIATx external coaching and the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) case management telementoring model, were compared to address this persistent treatment gap.

Methods: This 2 × 2 design compared high (n = 12) and low (n = 4) dose coaching with and without ECHO in a 12-month intervention and 12 M sustainability period. The national trial included 25 jails and 13 community-based partners. MOUD trends for buprenorphine, methadone, injectable naltrexone, and combined MOUD between the study arms were assessed.

Results: Jail sizes ranged from 24% with < 100 and 24% with > 500 daily population, and community-based treatment providers ranged from 63% with < 50 and 7% with > 500 average monthly OUD intakes. New patient counts were found to significantly increase across the intervention phase for buprenorphine (p < .01) and combined MOUD (p < .01). Injectable naltrexone and methadone showed no consistent, significant gains. For sites with low coaching without ECHO, new patient counts for combined MOUD were predicted to increase by 47.44% during the intervention phase and 7.30% during the sustainability phase. ECHO demonstrated that MOUD use did not significantly increase compared to coaching across MOUDs in the intervention phase (p = .517). High- and low-dose coaching showed no significant differences in MOUD use during the intervention phase (p = .124).

Conclusions: Coaching emerged as a more effective implementation strategy than ECHO for increasing buprenorphine use in jail settings. In practice, ECHO sessions offered considerable overlap with coaching strategies. While high-dose coaching had greater gains for MOUDs overall than low-dose coaching, those gains were statistically insignificant, suggesting low-dose coaching to be more economical. To increase MOUD use in jail settings, jurisdictions should focus on new MOUDs so all three MOUDs are available and enhance the post-incarceration continuum of care.

Trial registration: Name of registry: ClinicalTrials.gov.

Trial registration number: NCT04363320. Date of registration: 2020-07-30. URL of trial registry record: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04363320?term=molfenter&rank=7 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Implementation Science
Implementation Science 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Implementation Science is a leading journal committed to disseminating evidence on methods for integrating research findings into routine healthcare practice and policy. It offers a multidisciplinary platform for studying implementation strategies, encompassing their development, outcomes, economics, processes, and associated factors. The journal prioritizes rigorous studies and innovative, theory-based approaches, covering implementation science across various healthcare services and settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信