数字化医院评价量表:量表开发研究。

Durmuş Gokkaya, Mesut Karaman, Esengül Purkuloglu
{"title":"数字化医院评价量表:量表开发研究。","authors":"Durmuş Gokkaya, Mesut Karaman, Esengül Purkuloglu","doi":"10.1177/18333583241307979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To conduct and report on psychometric tests for a valid and reliable measurement tool for evaluating digital hospitals by healthcare professionals. <b>Method:</b> This psychometric study took place in a public digital hospital in Turkey. It was carried out with the participation of 355 healthcare professionals. Data were collected between September and October 2023 using an online survey and non-probability convenience sampling method. Statistical Package for Social Science Version (SPSS) 26.0 and analysis of moment structures version 24.0 were used to analyse the data. It was used for the psychometric properties and analyses of the scale (item analysis, explanatory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), convergent and divergent validity statistics, Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient, dependent sample <i>t</i>-test, and intraclass correlation). <b>Results:</b> The content validity index of the scale is 0.92. As a result of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and CFA in separate samples, a total of 30 items and four sub-factors were obtained. Cronbach Alpha value of the scale is over 0.90 for both samples. In the four-factor structure, 82.64% of the total variance was explained. The 30-item and four-factor structure obtained in EFA was confirmed in CFA, and convergent and divergent validity statistics were provided. Test-retest results showed that the scale has high reliability. <b>Conclusion:</b> The digital hospital evaluation scale is valid and reliable for healthcare professionals to evaluate digital hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":73210,"journal":{"name":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","volume":" ","pages":"18333583241307979"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital hospital evaluation scale: A scale-development research study.\",\"authors\":\"Durmuş Gokkaya, Mesut Karaman, Esengül Purkuloglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/18333583241307979\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To conduct and report on psychometric tests for a valid and reliable measurement tool for evaluating digital hospitals by healthcare professionals. <b>Method:</b> This psychometric study took place in a public digital hospital in Turkey. It was carried out with the participation of 355 healthcare professionals. Data were collected between September and October 2023 using an online survey and non-probability convenience sampling method. Statistical Package for Social Science Version (SPSS) 26.0 and analysis of moment structures version 24.0 were used to analyse the data. It was used for the psychometric properties and analyses of the scale (item analysis, explanatory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), convergent and divergent validity statistics, Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient, dependent sample <i>t</i>-test, and intraclass correlation). <b>Results:</b> The content validity index of the scale is 0.92. As a result of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and CFA in separate samples, a total of 30 items and four sub-factors were obtained. Cronbach Alpha value of the scale is over 0.90 for both samples. In the four-factor structure, 82.64% of the total variance was explained. The 30-item and four-factor structure obtained in EFA was confirmed in CFA, and convergent and divergent validity statistics were provided. Test-retest results showed that the scale has high reliability. <b>Conclusion:</b> The digital hospital evaluation scale is valid and reliable for healthcare professionals to evaluate digital hospitals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"18333583241307979\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583241307979\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583241307979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为医疗保健专业人员评估数字医院提供一种有效、可靠的测量工具,开展并报告心理测量测试。方法:本心理测量学研究在土耳其一家公立数字医院进行。有355名保健专业人员参加了调查。数据收集于2023年9月至10月,采用在线调查和非概率方便抽样方法。采用SPSS 26.0和弯矩结构分析24.0对数据进行分析。用于量表的心理测量性质和分析(项目分析、解释因子分析、验证性因子分析(CFA)、收敛效度和发散效度统计、Cronbach Alpha内部一致性系数、因样本t检验和类内相关性)。结果:量表的内容效度指数为0.92。对不同样本进行探索性因子分析(EFA)和CFA,共得到30个项目和4个子因子。两个样本的量表Cronbach Alpha值均大于0.90。在四因子结构中,总方差的82.64%被解释。EFA中得到的30项4因素结构在CFA中得到证实,并给出了收敛效度和发散效度统计。重测结果表明,量表具有较高的信度。结论:编制的数字化医院评价量表有效、可靠,可用于医疗卫生专业人员对数字化医院的评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital hospital evaluation scale: A scale-development research study.

Aim: To conduct and report on psychometric tests for a valid and reliable measurement tool for evaluating digital hospitals by healthcare professionals. Method: This psychometric study took place in a public digital hospital in Turkey. It was carried out with the participation of 355 healthcare professionals. Data were collected between September and October 2023 using an online survey and non-probability convenience sampling method. Statistical Package for Social Science Version (SPSS) 26.0 and analysis of moment structures version 24.0 were used to analyse the data. It was used for the psychometric properties and analyses of the scale (item analysis, explanatory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), convergent and divergent validity statistics, Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient, dependent sample t-test, and intraclass correlation). Results: The content validity index of the scale is 0.92. As a result of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and CFA in separate samples, a total of 30 items and four sub-factors were obtained. Cronbach Alpha value of the scale is over 0.90 for both samples. In the four-factor structure, 82.64% of the total variance was explained. The 30-item and four-factor structure obtained in EFA was confirmed in CFA, and convergent and divergent validity statistics were provided. Test-retest results showed that the scale has high reliability. Conclusion: The digital hospital evaluation scale is valid and reliable for healthcare professionals to evaluate digital hospitals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信