记忆与遗忘:19世纪佛兰德和荷兰饥荒的文化记忆。

IF 0.4 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Dutch Crossing-Journal of Low Countries Studies Pub Date : 2024-12-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/03096564.2025.2441531
Lotte Jensen
{"title":"记忆与遗忘:19世纪佛兰德和荷兰饥荒的文化记忆。","authors":"Lotte Jensen","doi":"10.1080/03096564.2025.2441531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the years 1845-48 Belgium and the Netherlands suffered from famine as a result from potato blight. This article explores the question why this famine became a building block of Flemish identity leading to its inclusion in the Flemish canon, while the Dutch potato crisis still largeley remains forgotten. It is argued that the famine in Flanders was intrinsically linked with the nineteenth-century Flemish movement, thereby contributing to the self-image of ''poor Flanders''. By contrast, the emergence of Dutch identity goes further back in history and is mainly connected to prototypical disasters, such as floods. Famine did not suit this storyline and the ''superior'' ability of the Dutch to manage the water. This article also stresses the need for transnational approaches in the study of famine memories. A comparative approach makes it possible to understand why the same type of traumatic event was forgotten relatively quickly in one case, and became part of the collective memory in the other.</p>","PeriodicalId":41997,"journal":{"name":"Dutch Crossing-Journal of Low Countries Studies","volume":"49 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remembered and Forgotten: The Nineteenth-Century Flemish and Dutch Famine in Cultural Memory.\",\"authors\":\"Lotte Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03096564.2025.2441531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the years 1845-48 Belgium and the Netherlands suffered from famine as a result from potato blight. This article explores the question why this famine became a building block of Flemish identity leading to its inclusion in the Flemish canon, while the Dutch potato crisis still largeley remains forgotten. It is argued that the famine in Flanders was intrinsically linked with the nineteenth-century Flemish movement, thereby contributing to the self-image of ''poor Flanders''. By contrast, the emergence of Dutch identity goes further back in history and is mainly connected to prototypical disasters, such as floods. Famine did not suit this storyline and the ''superior'' ability of the Dutch to manage the water. This article also stresses the need for transnational approaches in the study of famine memories. A comparative approach makes it possible to understand why the same type of traumatic event was forgotten relatively quickly in one case, and became part of the collective memory in the other.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dutch Crossing-Journal of Low Countries Studies\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789461/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dutch Crossing-Journal of Low Countries Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03096564.2025.2441531\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dutch Crossing-Journal of Low Countries Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03096564.2025.2441531","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1845年至1848年,比利时和荷兰因马铃薯枯萎病而遭受饥荒。这篇文章探讨的问题是,为什么这场饥荒成为弗拉芒人身份的基石,导致它被纳入弗拉芒正典,而荷兰马铃薯危机在很大程度上仍然被遗忘。有人认为,佛兰德斯的饥荒与19世纪的佛兰德运动有着内在的联系,从而促成了“贫穷的佛兰德斯”的自我形象。相比之下,荷兰人身份的出现可以追溯到更久远的历史,主要与洪水等典型灾害有关。饥荒不适合这个故事情节,也不适合荷兰人管理水资源的“卓越”能力。本文还强调了在饥荒记忆研究中采用跨国方法的必要性。一种比较的方法使我们有可能理解为什么同一类型的创伤事件在一种情况下相对较快地被遗忘,而在另一种情况下却成为集体记忆的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Remembered and Forgotten: The Nineteenth-Century Flemish and Dutch Famine in Cultural Memory.

In the years 1845-48 Belgium and the Netherlands suffered from famine as a result from potato blight. This article explores the question why this famine became a building block of Flemish identity leading to its inclusion in the Flemish canon, while the Dutch potato crisis still largeley remains forgotten. It is argued that the famine in Flanders was intrinsically linked with the nineteenth-century Flemish movement, thereby contributing to the self-image of ''poor Flanders''. By contrast, the emergence of Dutch identity goes further back in history and is mainly connected to prototypical disasters, such as floods. Famine did not suit this storyline and the ''superior'' ability of the Dutch to manage the water. This article also stresses the need for transnational approaches in the study of famine memories. A comparative approach makes it possible to understand why the same type of traumatic event was forgotten relatively quickly in one case, and became part of the collective memory in the other.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信