在肥胖和上消化道手术中的裂孔悬吊式肝回缩技术-我们15年的1874例手术经验。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Muvva Sri Harsha, Raj Palaniappan, Nikhilesh Krishna
{"title":"在肥胖和上消化道手术中的裂孔悬吊式肝回缩技术-我们15年的1874例手术经验。","authors":"Muvva Sri Harsha, Raj Palaniappan, Nikhilesh Krishna","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_97_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Liver retraction is an important aspect when performing minimal access surgeries, especially bariatric and upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgeries. Various liver retraction methods are available and have been tried. Here, we present our experience with our indigenous hiatal sling technique for liver retraction and compare it with Nathanson liver retractor which is a popular and commonly used liver retraction method.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective observational study of 1874 patients who underwent bariatric and upper GI surgeries over the last 15 years since September 2009. A secondary study was conducted amongst the two groups of patients who underwent upper GI and bariatric surgeries using hiatal sling technique and Nathanson retractor system for liver retraction between January 2023 and October 2023. End points measured were time taken, conversions and complication along with liver function tests (LFTs) such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine transaminase measured between the two groups pre- and postoperatively day 0, day 1, day 3 and day 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our series of 1874 patients, hiatal sling liver traction was possible without any difficulties in all except 2 patients with no associated liver injury and with adequate exposure. In the comparative study, patients in the hiatal sling group (Group B) had significantly lesser elevation in LFTs as compared to the patients in the Nathanson liver retraction group (Group A), with no adverse events in both the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hiatal sling technique for liver retraction is an effective technique which provides adequate exposure of the hiatus and causes lesser liver insult compared to rigid liver retraction system like Nathanson liver retraction system. Hiatal sling does not interfere with surgeons' field causing less errors during surgery and thus making it more ergonomic friendly.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hiatal sling liver retraction technique in bariatric and upper gastrointestinal surgeries - Our 15 year experience with 1874 surgeries.\",\"authors\":\"Muvva Sri Harsha, Raj Palaniappan, Nikhilesh Krishna\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmas.jmas_97_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Liver retraction is an important aspect when performing minimal access surgeries, especially bariatric and upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgeries. Various liver retraction methods are available and have been tried. Here, we present our experience with our indigenous hiatal sling technique for liver retraction and compare it with Nathanson liver retractor which is a popular and commonly used liver retraction method.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective observational study of 1874 patients who underwent bariatric and upper GI surgeries over the last 15 years since September 2009. A secondary study was conducted amongst the two groups of patients who underwent upper GI and bariatric surgeries using hiatal sling technique and Nathanson retractor system for liver retraction between January 2023 and October 2023. End points measured were time taken, conversions and complication along with liver function tests (LFTs) such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine transaminase measured between the two groups pre- and postoperatively day 0, day 1, day 3 and day 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our series of 1874 patients, hiatal sling liver traction was possible without any difficulties in all except 2 patients with no associated liver injury and with adequate exposure. In the comparative study, patients in the hiatal sling group (Group B) had significantly lesser elevation in LFTs as compared to the patients in the Nathanson liver retraction group (Group A), with no adverse events in both the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hiatal sling technique for liver retraction is an effective technique which provides adequate exposure of the hiatus and causes lesser liver insult compared to rigid liver retraction system like Nathanson liver retraction system. Hiatal sling does not interfere with surgeons' field causing less errors during surgery and thus making it more ergonomic friendly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_97_24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_97_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:肝回缩是进行最小通道手术时的一个重要方面,特别是肥胖和上胃肠道(GI)手术。各种各样的肝回缩方法是可用的,并已被尝试。在这里,我们介绍了我们的经验,我们的本土裂孔吊索技术的肝牵开,并比较它与Nathanson肝牵开是一种流行的和常用的肝牵开方法。患者和方法:这是一项回顾性观察性研究,自2009年9月以来的15年中,1874名患者接受了减肥和上消化道手术。在2023年1月至2023年10月期间,对两组接受上消化道和减肥手术的患者进行了二次研究,这些患者使用裂孔吊带技术和Nathanson牵开系统进行肝牵开。终点测量两组患者术后第0天、第1天、第3天和第7天的肝功能测试(LFTs),如谷草转氨酶(AST)和丙氨酸转氨酶,所用时间、转化率和并发症。结果:在我们的1874例患者中,除了2例无相关肝损伤且暴露充分的患者外,其余患者均可以无任何困难地进行切口悬吊肝牵引。在比较研究中,裂孔吊带组(B组)患者的LFTs升高明显低于Nathanson肝回拉组(A组),两组均无不良事件发生。结论:与Nathanson等刚性肝牵回系统相比,裂孔悬吊技术是一种有效的肝牵回技术,可提供充分的裂孔暴露,对肝脏的损伤较小。裂孔吊索不会干扰外科医生的视野,从而减少手术过程中的错误,从而使其更符合人体工程学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hiatal sling liver retraction technique in bariatric and upper gastrointestinal surgeries - Our 15 year experience with 1874 surgeries.

Introduction: Liver retraction is an important aspect when performing minimal access surgeries, especially bariatric and upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgeries. Various liver retraction methods are available and have been tried. Here, we present our experience with our indigenous hiatal sling technique for liver retraction and compare it with Nathanson liver retractor which is a popular and commonly used liver retraction method.

Patients and methods: This is a retrospective observational study of 1874 patients who underwent bariatric and upper GI surgeries over the last 15 years since September 2009. A secondary study was conducted amongst the two groups of patients who underwent upper GI and bariatric surgeries using hiatal sling technique and Nathanson retractor system for liver retraction between January 2023 and October 2023. End points measured were time taken, conversions and complication along with liver function tests (LFTs) such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine transaminase measured between the two groups pre- and postoperatively day 0, day 1, day 3 and day 7.

Results: In our series of 1874 patients, hiatal sling liver traction was possible without any difficulties in all except 2 patients with no associated liver injury and with adequate exposure. In the comparative study, patients in the hiatal sling group (Group B) had significantly lesser elevation in LFTs as compared to the patients in the Nathanson liver retraction group (Group A), with no adverse events in both the groups.

Conclusion: Hiatal sling technique for liver retraction is an effective technique which provides adequate exposure of the hiatus and causes lesser liver insult compared to rigid liver retraction system like Nathanson liver retraction system. Hiatal sling does not interfere with surgeons' field causing less errors during surgery and thus making it more ergonomic friendly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信