低剂量Lenvatinib与高剂量Lenvatinib治疗放射性碘难治性分化甲状腺癌的安全性和有效性分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Jeepalem Sai Moulika, Kunal Ramesh Chandekar, Shubha Gadde Ravindra, Priyanka G B, Sanjana Ballal, Madhavi Tripathi, Swayamjeet Satapathy, Chandrasekhar Bal
{"title":"低剂量Lenvatinib与高剂量Lenvatinib治疗放射性碘难治性分化甲状腺癌的安全性和有效性分析。","authors":"Jeepalem Sai Moulika, Kunal Ramesh Chandekar, Shubha Gadde Ravindra, Priyanka G B, Sanjana Ballal, Madhavi Tripathi, Swayamjeet Satapathy, Chandrasekhar Bal","doi":"10.1111/cen.15214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lenvatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC) at a dose of 24 mg/day. Given its significant toxicity profile, the present study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of initial low-dose lenvatinib to that of higher starting doses in patients with RR-DTC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with RR-DTC who were classified as: Group-A: patients receiving 10mg/day, and Group-B: patients receiving ≥ 14mg/day of lenvatinib as starting dose. Safety, radiological response (as per RECIST 1.1) and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes were analysed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 105 patients with RR-DTC were included in this study (Group-A: 60, Group-B: 45). The study found that Group-B experienced significantly higher rates of drug interruptions (68.9% vs 48.3%, p = 0.035) and dose reductions (60% vs 11.7%; p < 0.001) compared to Group-A. Adverse events such as hand-foot skin reaction (77.8% vs 58.3%), diarrhea (28.9% vs 11.7%), hepatotoxicity (33.3-40% vs 11.7-18.3%), and electrolyte imbalance (15.6% vs 3.3%) were also more frequent in Group-B (p-values < 0.05). However, both groups showed similar objective response rates (47.1% vs 46.3%; p = 0.936) and comparable PFS outcomes (restricted mean survival time at 24 months: 22.8 vs 21.4 months, p = 0.128).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study suggests that starting with lower doses of lenvatinib, followed by dose escalation if tolerated, may offer a safer approach with significantly lower rates of drug interruptions and dose reductions, with comparable efficacy in RR-DTC patients. Further validation by larger prospective trials is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":10346,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Endocrinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-Dose Versus High-Dose Lenvatinib in Radioiodine Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer-A Real-World Safety and Efficacy Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jeepalem Sai Moulika, Kunal Ramesh Chandekar, Shubha Gadde Ravindra, Priyanka G B, Sanjana Ballal, Madhavi Tripathi, Swayamjeet Satapathy, Chandrasekhar Bal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cen.15214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lenvatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC) at a dose of 24 mg/day. Given its significant toxicity profile, the present study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of initial low-dose lenvatinib to that of higher starting doses in patients with RR-DTC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with RR-DTC who were classified as: Group-A: patients receiving 10mg/day, and Group-B: patients receiving ≥ 14mg/day of lenvatinib as starting dose. Safety, radiological response (as per RECIST 1.1) and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes were analysed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 105 patients with RR-DTC were included in this study (Group-A: 60, Group-B: 45). The study found that Group-B experienced significantly higher rates of drug interruptions (68.9% vs 48.3%, p = 0.035) and dose reductions (60% vs 11.7%; p < 0.001) compared to Group-A. Adverse events such as hand-foot skin reaction (77.8% vs 58.3%), diarrhea (28.9% vs 11.7%), hepatotoxicity (33.3-40% vs 11.7-18.3%), and electrolyte imbalance (15.6% vs 3.3%) were also more frequent in Group-B (p-values < 0.05). However, both groups showed similar objective response rates (47.1% vs 46.3%; p = 0.936) and comparable PFS outcomes (restricted mean survival time at 24 months: 22.8 vs 21.4 months, p = 0.128).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study suggests that starting with lower doses of lenvatinib, followed by dose escalation if tolerated, may offer a safer approach with significantly lower rates of drug interruptions and dose reductions, with comparable efficacy in RR-DTC patients. Further validation by larger prospective trials is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.15214\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.15214","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:Lenvatinib是一种酪氨酸激酶抑制剂,被批准用于治疗放射性碘难治性分化型甲状腺癌(RR-DTC),剂量为24mg /天。鉴于lenvatinib具有明显的毒性,本研究旨在比较RR-DTC患者初始低剂量lenvatinib与初始高剂量lenvatinib的安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性研究纳入RR-DTC患者,分为:a组:起始剂量为10mg/天的患者,b组:起始剂量≥14mg/天的lenvatinib患者。安全性、放射反应(根据RECIST 1.1)和无进展生存期(PFS)结果进行了分析和比较。结果:共纳入RR-DTC患者105例(A组60例,b组45例)。研究发现,b组的药物中断率(68.9% vs 48.3%, p = 0.035)和剂量减少率(60% vs 11.7%;结论:研究表明,从低剂量lenvatinib开始,然后在耐受情况下增加剂量,可能是一种更安全的方法,药物中断率和剂量减少率显著降低,对RR-DTC患者具有相当的疗效。有必要通过更大规模的前瞻性试验进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low-Dose Versus High-Dose Lenvatinib in Radioiodine Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer-A Real-World Safety and Efficacy Analysis.

Objective: Lenvatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC) at a dose of 24 mg/day. Given its significant toxicity profile, the present study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of initial low-dose lenvatinib to that of higher starting doses in patients with RR-DTC.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients with RR-DTC who were classified as: Group-A: patients receiving 10mg/day, and Group-B: patients receiving ≥ 14mg/day of lenvatinib as starting dose. Safety, radiological response (as per RECIST 1.1) and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes were analysed and compared.

Results: A total of 105 patients with RR-DTC were included in this study (Group-A: 60, Group-B: 45). The study found that Group-B experienced significantly higher rates of drug interruptions (68.9% vs 48.3%, p = 0.035) and dose reductions (60% vs 11.7%; p < 0.001) compared to Group-A. Adverse events such as hand-foot skin reaction (77.8% vs 58.3%), diarrhea (28.9% vs 11.7%), hepatotoxicity (33.3-40% vs 11.7-18.3%), and electrolyte imbalance (15.6% vs 3.3%) were also more frequent in Group-B (p-values < 0.05). However, both groups showed similar objective response rates (47.1% vs 46.3%; p = 0.936) and comparable PFS outcomes (restricted mean survival time at 24 months: 22.8 vs 21.4 months, p = 0.128).

Conclusions: The study suggests that starting with lower doses of lenvatinib, followed by dose escalation if tolerated, may offer a safer approach with significantly lower rates of drug interruptions and dose reductions, with comparable efficacy in RR-DTC patients. Further validation by larger prospective trials is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Endocrinology
Clinical Endocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
192
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Endocrinology publishes papers and reviews which focus on the clinical aspects of endocrinology, including the clinical application of molecular endocrinology. It does not publish papers relating directly to diabetes care and clinical management. It features reviews, original papers, commentaries, correspondence and Clinical Questions. Clinical Endocrinology is essential reading not only for those engaged in endocrinological research but also for those involved primarily in clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信