基于定量系统毒理学软件平台DILIsym的健康成人对乙酰氨基酚缓释和速释制剂过量后药代动力学和肝脏生物标志物的建模与模拟

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
James J. Beaudoin, Kyunghee Yang, Brett A. Howell, Zackary Kenz, Vinal V. Lakhani, Jeffrey L. Woodhead, John C. K. Lai, Cathy K. Gelotte, Sury Sista, Evren Atillasoy
{"title":"基于定量系统毒理学软件平台DILIsym的健康成人对乙酰氨基酚缓释和速释制剂过量后药代动力学和肝脏生物标志物的建模与模拟","authors":"James J. Beaudoin,&nbsp;Kyunghee Yang,&nbsp;Brett A. Howell,&nbsp;Zackary Kenz,&nbsp;Vinal V. Lakhani,&nbsp;Jeffrey L. Woodhead,&nbsp;John C. K. Lai,&nbsp;Cathy K. Gelotte,&nbsp;Sury Sista,&nbsp;Evren Atillasoy","doi":"10.1002/psp4.13304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Acetaminophen (APAP) has been formulated as immediate-, modified-, and extended-release tablets (APAP-IR, -MR, and -ER, respectively). However, there was concern that APAP-MR previously available in Europe could form a bezoar after a large overdose, leading to delayed absorption and atypical pharmacokinetics (PK) compared to APAP-IR, and that current treatment guidelines developed for APAP overdose to prevent severe hepatotoxicity are inappropriate for APAP-MR. In contrast, APAP-ER caplets available in the United States are designed with an IR layer and an erodible ER layer. Using modeling and simulation, predicted PK and hepatotoxicity biomarkers following various acute overdose and repeated supratherapeutic ingestion (RSTI) scenarios with APAP-IR and APAP-ER were compared to investigate the differences between these two formulations. The existing APAP-IR representation within DILIsym v8A, a quantitative systems toxicology model of drug-induced liver injury, was updated, and an APAP-ER model was developed, using newly acquired in vitro (e.g., tiny-TIM<i>sg</i>) and clinical data. The model and simulated populations (SimPops) representing healthy adults were extensively validated, before simulating PK and three clinically useful hepatic biomarkers after various overdose scenarios. On average, APAP exposure after acute overdose and RSTI in healthy adults was predicted to be slightly lower for APAP-ER compared to APAP-IR, partially due to lower APAP absorption for APAP-ER, while not markedly impacting the expected time course of APAP plasma concentrations. Similar hepatic biomarker profiles were predicted for both APAP formulations. Based on these results, the APAP overdose consensus treatment guidelines updated in 2023 are not further impacted by this report.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"14 4","pages":"681-694"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.13304","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling and Simulation of Acetaminophen Pharmacokinetics and Hepatic Biomarkers After Overdoses of Extended-Release and Immediate-Release Formulations in Healthy Adults Using the Quantitative Systems Toxicology Software Platform DILIsym\",\"authors\":\"James J. Beaudoin,&nbsp;Kyunghee Yang,&nbsp;Brett A. Howell,&nbsp;Zackary Kenz,&nbsp;Vinal V. Lakhani,&nbsp;Jeffrey L. Woodhead,&nbsp;John C. K. Lai,&nbsp;Cathy K. Gelotte,&nbsp;Sury Sista,&nbsp;Evren Atillasoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/psp4.13304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Acetaminophen (APAP) has been formulated as immediate-, modified-, and extended-release tablets (APAP-IR, -MR, and -ER, respectively). However, there was concern that APAP-MR previously available in Europe could form a bezoar after a large overdose, leading to delayed absorption and atypical pharmacokinetics (PK) compared to APAP-IR, and that current treatment guidelines developed for APAP overdose to prevent severe hepatotoxicity are inappropriate for APAP-MR. In contrast, APAP-ER caplets available in the United States are designed with an IR layer and an erodible ER layer. Using modeling and simulation, predicted PK and hepatotoxicity biomarkers following various acute overdose and repeated supratherapeutic ingestion (RSTI) scenarios with APAP-IR and APAP-ER were compared to investigate the differences between these two formulations. The existing APAP-IR representation within DILIsym v8A, a quantitative systems toxicology model of drug-induced liver injury, was updated, and an APAP-ER model was developed, using newly acquired in vitro (e.g., tiny-TIM<i>sg</i>) and clinical data. The model and simulated populations (SimPops) representing healthy adults were extensively validated, before simulating PK and three clinically useful hepatic biomarkers after various overdose scenarios. On average, APAP exposure after acute overdose and RSTI in healthy adults was predicted to be slightly lower for APAP-ER compared to APAP-IR, partially due to lower APAP absorption for APAP-ER, while not markedly impacting the expected time course of APAP plasma concentrations. Similar hepatic biomarker profiles were predicted for both APAP formulations. Based on these results, the APAP overdose consensus treatment guidelines updated in 2023 are not further impacted by this report.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"681-694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.13304\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp4.13304\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp4.13304","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对乙酰氨基酚(APAP)已被配制为立即释放片、改性片和缓释片(分别为APAP- ir、- mr和- er)。然而,人们担心,与APAP- ir相比,欧洲先前可用的APAP- mr在大量过量后可能形成牛黄,导致吸收延迟和非典型药代动力学(PK),并且目前为APAP过量预防严重肝毒性而制定的治疗指南不适用于APAP- mr。相比之下,美国可用的APAP-ER胶囊设计有IR层和可腐蚀的ER层。通过建模和模拟,比较了APAP-IR和APAP-ER在各种急性过量和重复超治疗摄入(RSTI)情况下预测的PK和肝毒性生物标志物,以研究这两种配方之间的差异。更新药物性肝损伤定量系统毒理学模型DILIsym v8A中现有的APAP-IR表示,利用新获得的体外(如tiny-TIMsg)和临床数据,建立APAP-ER模型。模型和代表健康成人的模拟人群(SimPops)经过广泛验证,然后模拟各种过量情景下的PK和三种临床有用的肝脏生物标志物。平均而言,与APAP- ir相比,健康成人急性过量用药和RSTI后APAP- er的APAP暴露预计略低于APAP- ir,部分原因是APAP- er的APAP吸收较低,而APAP血浆浓度的预期时间过程没有显著影响。预测两种APAP制剂的肝脏生物标志物谱相似。基于这些结果,2023年更新的APAP过量共识治疗指南不会受到本报告的进一步影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Modeling and Simulation of Acetaminophen Pharmacokinetics and Hepatic Biomarkers After Overdoses of Extended-Release and Immediate-Release Formulations in Healthy Adults Using the Quantitative Systems Toxicology Software Platform DILIsym

Modeling and Simulation of Acetaminophen Pharmacokinetics and Hepatic Biomarkers After Overdoses of Extended-Release and Immediate-Release Formulations in Healthy Adults Using the Quantitative Systems Toxicology Software Platform DILIsym

Acetaminophen (APAP) has been formulated as immediate-, modified-, and extended-release tablets (APAP-IR, -MR, and -ER, respectively). However, there was concern that APAP-MR previously available in Europe could form a bezoar after a large overdose, leading to delayed absorption and atypical pharmacokinetics (PK) compared to APAP-IR, and that current treatment guidelines developed for APAP overdose to prevent severe hepatotoxicity are inappropriate for APAP-MR. In contrast, APAP-ER caplets available in the United States are designed with an IR layer and an erodible ER layer. Using modeling and simulation, predicted PK and hepatotoxicity biomarkers following various acute overdose and repeated supratherapeutic ingestion (RSTI) scenarios with APAP-IR and APAP-ER were compared to investigate the differences between these two formulations. The existing APAP-IR representation within DILIsym v8A, a quantitative systems toxicology model of drug-induced liver injury, was updated, and an APAP-ER model was developed, using newly acquired in vitro (e.g., tiny-TIMsg) and clinical data. The model and simulated populations (SimPops) representing healthy adults were extensively validated, before simulating PK and three clinically useful hepatic biomarkers after various overdose scenarios. On average, APAP exposure after acute overdose and RSTI in healthy adults was predicted to be slightly lower for APAP-ER compared to APAP-IR, partially due to lower APAP absorption for APAP-ER, while not markedly impacting the expected time course of APAP plasma concentrations. Similar hepatic biomarker profiles were predicted for both APAP formulations. Based on these results, the APAP overdose consensus treatment guidelines updated in 2023 are not further impacted by this report.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.40%
发文量
146
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信