真实世界的临床经验,血清MOG和AQP4抗体检测的活细胞和固定细胞为基础的分析。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yana Said, Angeliki Filippatou, Conlan Tran, LuAnn Rezavi, Kai Guo, Matthew D. Smith, Yasmin Resto, John J. Chen, Peter A. Calabresi, Patrizio Caturegli, Sean J. Pittock, Eoin P. Flanagan, Elias S. Sotirchos
{"title":"真实世界的临床经验,血清MOG和AQP4抗体检测的活细胞和固定细胞为基础的分析。","authors":"Yana Said,&nbsp;Angeliki Filippatou,&nbsp;Conlan Tran,&nbsp;LuAnn Rezavi,&nbsp;Kai Guo,&nbsp;Matthew D. Smith,&nbsp;Yasmin Resto,&nbsp;John J. Chen,&nbsp;Peter A. Calabresi,&nbsp;Patrizio Caturegli,&nbsp;Sean J. Pittock,&nbsp;Eoin P. Flanagan,&nbsp;Elias S. Sotirchos","doi":"10.1002/acn3.52310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the real-world performance of a live (LCBA) versus a fixed (FCBA) cell-based assay for the detection of serum antibodies directed against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) and aquaporin-4 (AQP4-IgG).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a retrospective study of patients evaluated at a single tertiary academic referral center, with serum testing performed clinically for AQP4-IgG and/or MOG-IgG by FCBA and LCBA on the same day. Additionally, frozen banked sera from the same day for patients tested only by one assay were retrieved and tested by the other assay. FCBA was performed by the Johns Hopkins Immunology Laboratory using Euroimmun kits with detection by indirect immunofluorescence (FCBA-IF), whereas LCBA was performed by the Mayo Clinic Neuroimmunology Laboratory with detection by flow cytometry (LCBA-FACS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 594 specimens with paired MOG-IgG testing, 500 were negative by both assays, 33 were positive by both assays, 56 were positive exclusively by LCBA-FACS, and 5 were only positive by FCBA-IF. Overall, MOG-IgG LCBA-FACS exhibited 95.1% sensitivity and 97.7% specificity, whereas MOG-IgG FCBA-IF had 45.7% sensitivity and 99.8% specificity. Of 577 specimens with paired AQP4-IgG testing, 503 were negative by both assays, 51 were positive by both assays, 21 were positive exclusively by LCBA-FACS, and 2 were only positive by FCBA-IF. Overall, AQP4-IgG LCBA-FACS exhibited 97.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity, whereas AQP4-IgG FCBA-IF had 71.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\n \n <p>LCBA-FACS for both MOG-IgG and AQP4-IgG had markedly better sensitivity than FCBA-IF, with similar specificity. The use of FCBA-IF may result in underrecognition of both MOG antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) and AQP4-IgG seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":"12 3","pages":"556-564"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acn3.52310","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world clinical experience with serum MOG and AQP4 antibody testing by live versus fixed cell-based assay\",\"authors\":\"Yana Said,&nbsp;Angeliki Filippatou,&nbsp;Conlan Tran,&nbsp;LuAnn Rezavi,&nbsp;Kai Guo,&nbsp;Matthew D. Smith,&nbsp;Yasmin Resto,&nbsp;John J. Chen,&nbsp;Peter A. Calabresi,&nbsp;Patrizio Caturegli,&nbsp;Sean J. Pittock,&nbsp;Eoin P. Flanagan,&nbsp;Elias S. Sotirchos\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acn3.52310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the real-world performance of a live (LCBA) versus a fixed (FCBA) cell-based assay for the detection of serum antibodies directed against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) and aquaporin-4 (AQP4-IgG).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was a retrospective study of patients evaluated at a single tertiary academic referral center, with serum testing performed clinically for AQP4-IgG and/or MOG-IgG by FCBA and LCBA on the same day. Additionally, frozen banked sera from the same day for patients tested only by one assay were retrieved and tested by the other assay. FCBA was performed by the Johns Hopkins Immunology Laboratory using Euroimmun kits with detection by indirect immunofluorescence (FCBA-IF), whereas LCBA was performed by the Mayo Clinic Neuroimmunology Laboratory with detection by flow cytometry (LCBA-FACS).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 594 specimens with paired MOG-IgG testing, 500 were negative by both assays, 33 were positive by both assays, 56 were positive exclusively by LCBA-FACS, and 5 were only positive by FCBA-IF. Overall, MOG-IgG LCBA-FACS exhibited 95.1% sensitivity and 97.7% specificity, whereas MOG-IgG FCBA-IF had 45.7% sensitivity and 99.8% specificity. Of 577 specimens with paired AQP4-IgG testing, 503 were negative by both assays, 51 were positive by both assays, 21 were positive exclusively by LCBA-FACS, and 2 were only positive by FCBA-IF. Overall, AQP4-IgG LCBA-FACS exhibited 97.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity, whereas AQP4-IgG FCBA-IF had 71.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\\n \\n <p>LCBA-FACS for both MOG-IgG and AQP4-IgG had markedly better sensitivity than FCBA-IF, with similar specificity. The use of FCBA-IF may result in underrecognition of both MOG antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) and AQP4-IgG seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"556-564\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acn3.52310\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acn3.52310\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acn3.52310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估活细胞(LCBA)与固定细胞(FCBA)检测髓鞘少突胶质细胞糖蛋白(MOG-IgG)和水通道蛋白-4 (AQP4-IgG)血清抗体的实际性能。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,在单一三级学术转诊中心评估的患者,在同一天通过FCBA和LCBA临床检测AQP4-IgG和/或MOG-IgG。此外,仅通过一种方法检测的患者同一天的冷冻血清被提取并通过另一种方法检测。FCBA由约翰霍普金斯免疫学实验室使用euroimmune试剂盒进行间接免疫荧光检测(FCBA- if),而LCBA由梅奥诊所神经免疫学实验室进行流式细胞术检测(LCBA- facs)。结果:594例MOG-IgG配对检测标本中,两项检测均阴性500例,两项检测均阳性33例,LCBA-FACS检测纯阳性56例,FCBA-IF检测纯阳性5例。总体而言,MOG-IgG LCBA-FACS具有95.1%的敏感性和97.7%的特异性,而MOG-IgG FCBA-IF具有45.7%的敏感性和99.8%的特异性。577例AQP4-IgG配对检测标本中,503例两法均阴性,51例两法均阳性,21例LCBA-FACS全阳性,2例FCBA-IF全阳性。总体而言,AQP4-IgG LCBA-FACS的敏感性为97.3%,特异性为100%,而AQP4-IgG FCBA-IF的敏感性为71.6%,特异性为100%。结论:LCBA-FACS检测MOG-IgG和AQP4-IgG的敏感性明显优于FCBA-IF,特异性相似。使用FCBA-IF可能导致对MOG抗体相关疾病(MOGAD)和AQP4-IgG血清阳性视神经脊髓炎频谱障碍(NMOSD)的识别不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Real-world clinical experience with serum MOG and AQP4 antibody testing by live versus fixed cell-based assay

Real-world clinical experience with serum MOG and AQP4 antibody testing by live versus fixed cell-based assay

Objective

To assess the real-world performance of a live (LCBA) versus a fixed (FCBA) cell-based assay for the detection of serum antibodies directed against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) and aquaporin-4 (AQP4-IgG).

Methods

This was a retrospective study of patients evaluated at a single tertiary academic referral center, with serum testing performed clinically for AQP4-IgG and/or MOG-IgG by FCBA and LCBA on the same day. Additionally, frozen banked sera from the same day for patients tested only by one assay were retrieved and tested by the other assay. FCBA was performed by the Johns Hopkins Immunology Laboratory using Euroimmun kits with detection by indirect immunofluorescence (FCBA-IF), whereas LCBA was performed by the Mayo Clinic Neuroimmunology Laboratory with detection by flow cytometry (LCBA-FACS).

Results

Of 594 specimens with paired MOG-IgG testing, 500 were negative by both assays, 33 were positive by both assays, 56 were positive exclusively by LCBA-FACS, and 5 were only positive by FCBA-IF. Overall, MOG-IgG LCBA-FACS exhibited 95.1% sensitivity and 97.7% specificity, whereas MOG-IgG FCBA-IF had 45.7% sensitivity and 99.8% specificity. Of 577 specimens with paired AQP4-IgG testing, 503 were negative by both assays, 51 were positive by both assays, 21 were positive exclusively by LCBA-FACS, and 2 were only positive by FCBA-IF. Overall, AQP4-IgG LCBA-FACS exhibited 97.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity, whereas AQP4-IgG FCBA-IF had 71.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

Interpretation

LCBA-FACS for both MOG-IgG and AQP4-IgG had markedly better sensitivity than FCBA-IF, with similar specificity. The use of FCBA-IF may result in underrecognition of both MOG antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) and AQP4-IgG seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信