“我为什么要回到那里?”":医疗不信任和产妇死亡问题

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Law & Policy Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1111/lapo.12258
Amber B. Vayo
{"title":"“我为什么要回到那里?”\":医疗不信任和产妇死亡问题","authors":"Amber B. Vayo","doi":"10.1111/lapo.12258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>What if we could save lives just by listening to women? “‘Why Would I go back There?’: Medical Mistrust and the Maternal Mortality Crisis” explores this question through birth narratives from people whose experiences made them hesitant to seek out any medical care. According to the CDC, over half of maternal mortality happens after people leave the hospital, and between 60% and 80% of maternal deaths are preventable. Understanding why these parents are not seeking care is integral to ending preventable maternal deaths. While health policy advocates have developed policies to remove structural and economic barriers to postpartum services, there are still patients who will not return to the hospital, even for lifesaving care. This article explores one possible reason why. Based on interviews with over 100 people who gave birth, this article joins scholars who view medical mistrust as a fundamental barrier to policy compliance. People will only return to the hospital if they think it will be better for them to do so. With an experience-conscious view in mind, this article ends with relevant policy recommendations gathered from health programs designed to bring trust back into maternal care.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47050,"journal":{"name":"Law & Policy","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Why Would I Go Back There?”: Medical Mistrust and the Problem of Maternal Mortality\",\"authors\":\"Amber B. Vayo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/lapo.12258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>What if we could save lives just by listening to women? “‘Why Would I go back There?’: Medical Mistrust and the Maternal Mortality Crisis” explores this question through birth narratives from people whose experiences made them hesitant to seek out any medical care. According to the CDC, over half of maternal mortality happens after people leave the hospital, and between 60% and 80% of maternal deaths are preventable. Understanding why these parents are not seeking care is integral to ending preventable maternal deaths. While health policy advocates have developed policies to remove structural and economic barriers to postpartum services, there are still patients who will not return to the hospital, even for lifesaving care. This article explores one possible reason why. Based on interviews with over 100 people who gave birth, this article joins scholars who view medical mistrust as a fundamental barrier to policy compliance. People will only return to the hospital if they think it will be better for them to do so. With an experience-conscious view in mind, this article ends with relevant policy recommendations gathered from health programs designed to bring trust back into maternal care.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Policy\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12258\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12258","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果我们能通过倾听女性的声音来拯救生命呢?“‘我为什么要回去?“:医疗不信任和孕产妇死亡危机”通过人们的出生叙述来探讨这个问题,这些人的经历使他们在寻求任何医疗服务时犹豫不决。根据疾病预防控制中心的数据,超过一半的孕产妇死亡发生在人们离开医院之后,60%至80%的孕产妇死亡是可以预防的。了解这些父母不寻求护理的原因,对于消除可预防的孕产妇死亡至关重要。虽然卫生政策倡导者已经制定了政策,以消除产后服务的结构性和经济障碍,但仍然有患者不愿回到医院,即使是为了挽救生命的护理。本文探讨了其中一个可能的原因。基于对100多位产妇的采访,这篇文章加入了一些学者的观点,他们认为医疗不信任是政策遵从的根本障碍。只有当人们认为这样做对他们更好的时候,他们才会回到医院。考虑到经验意识的观点,本文最后提出了从旨在使信任回归孕产妇保健的卫生项目中收集的相关政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Why Would I Go Back There?”: Medical Mistrust and the Problem of Maternal Mortality

What if we could save lives just by listening to women? “‘Why Would I go back There?’: Medical Mistrust and the Maternal Mortality Crisis” explores this question through birth narratives from people whose experiences made them hesitant to seek out any medical care. According to the CDC, over half of maternal mortality happens after people leave the hospital, and between 60% and 80% of maternal deaths are preventable. Understanding why these parents are not seeking care is integral to ending preventable maternal deaths. While health policy advocates have developed policies to remove structural and economic barriers to postpartum services, there are still patients who will not return to the hospital, even for lifesaving care. This article explores one possible reason why. Based on interviews with over 100 people who gave birth, this article joins scholars who view medical mistrust as a fundamental barrier to policy compliance. People will only return to the hospital if they think it will be better for them to do so. With an experience-conscious view in mind, this article ends with relevant policy recommendations gathered from health programs designed to bring trust back into maternal care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: International and interdisciplinary in scope, Law & Policy embraces varied research methodologies that interrogate law, governance, and public policy worldwide. Law & Policy makes a vital contribution to the current dialogue on contemporary policy by publishing innovative, peer-reviewed articles on such critical topics as • government and self-regulation • health • environment • family • gender • taxation and finance • legal decision-making • criminal justice • human rights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信