基于编写与编码数字平台与课程的基于读写能力的脚手架式编码教学

IF 5.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Amy Hutchison, Qi Si, Jamie Colwell, Erdogan Kaya, Eileen Jakeway, Brittany Miller, Kristie Gutierrez, Kelly Regan, Anna Evmenova
{"title":"基于编写与编码数字平台与课程的基于读写能力的脚手架式编码教学","authors":"Amy Hutchison,&nbsp;Qi Si,&nbsp;Jamie Colwell,&nbsp;Erdogan Kaya,&nbsp;Eileen Jakeway,&nbsp;Brittany Miller,&nbsp;Kristie Gutierrez,&nbsp;Kelly Regan,&nbsp;Anna Evmenova","doi":"10.1111/jcal.13115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In recent years, computer science education has emerged as a necessary part of school curricula for students of all ages. With such momentum in this direction, it is essential that program designers, educators, and researchers ensure that computer science education is designed to be inclusive, effective, and engaging for all students.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Accordingly, this paper reports on the design and implementation of an inclusive digital learning platform and accompanying curriculum for scaffolding and integrating coding into writing instruction for elementary-aged students (approximately ages 9–12). In this paper, we report on teachers' uses of the Compose and Code (CoCo) platform and curriculum, how students used its features, and its influence on students' computational thinking skills and attitudes about coding.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Data analysed in this mixed-methods study come from 11 teachers and 595 students in Grades 3–6. Data sources included teacher reflections and interviews, an assessment of computational thinking for students, and a coding attitudes survey for students. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and using paired sample <i>t</i>-tests. Qualitative data were analysed inductively using open coding to determine emergent categories.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Findings indicate that (1) a majority of students effectively used the CoCo platform to plan their work and code in Scratch, with a smaller percentage using the self-evaluation and self-monitoring features, (2) teachers indicated overall positive perceptions of the CoCo platform and curriculum, with strong support for using it in the future, (3) students' computational thinking skills improved over the course of the project, with results indicating a large effect size (<i>g</i> = 1.24), and (4) student attitudinal results were mixed, providing insights to the barriers that students face when learning to code. Overall, this study indicates that the CoCo platform and curriculum show promise as a scaffolded, structured, and integrated tool for teaching elementary computer science to elementary grade students.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scaffolding Coding Instruction Through Literacy via the Compose and Code Digital Platform and Curriculum\",\"authors\":\"Amy Hutchison,&nbsp;Qi Si,&nbsp;Jamie Colwell,&nbsp;Erdogan Kaya,&nbsp;Eileen Jakeway,&nbsp;Brittany Miller,&nbsp;Kristie Gutierrez,&nbsp;Kelly Regan,&nbsp;Anna Evmenova\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcal.13115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>In recent years, computer science education has emerged as a necessary part of school curricula for students of all ages. With such momentum in this direction, it is essential that program designers, educators, and researchers ensure that computer science education is designed to be inclusive, effective, and engaging for all students.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Accordingly, this paper reports on the design and implementation of an inclusive digital learning platform and accompanying curriculum for scaffolding and integrating coding into writing instruction for elementary-aged students (approximately ages 9–12). In this paper, we report on teachers' uses of the Compose and Code (CoCo) platform and curriculum, how students used its features, and its influence on students' computational thinking skills and attitudes about coding.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data analysed in this mixed-methods study come from 11 teachers and 595 students in Grades 3–6. Data sources included teacher reflections and interviews, an assessment of computational thinking for students, and a coding attitudes survey for students. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and using paired sample <i>t</i>-tests. Qualitative data were analysed inductively using open coding to determine emergent categories.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results and Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Findings indicate that (1) a majority of students effectively used the CoCo platform to plan their work and code in Scratch, with a smaller percentage using the self-evaluation and self-monitoring features, (2) teachers indicated overall positive perceptions of the CoCo platform and curriculum, with strong support for using it in the future, (3) students' computational thinking skills improved over the course of the project, with results indicating a large effect size (<i>g</i> = 1.24), and (4) student attitudinal results were mixed, providing insights to the barriers that students face when learning to code. Overall, this study indicates that the CoCo platform and curriculum show promise as a scaffolded, structured, and integrated tool for teaching elementary computer science to elementary grade students.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.13115\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.13115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,计算机科学教育已成为各个年龄段学生学校课程的必要组成部分。随着这个方向的发展,程序设计者、教育者和研究人员必须确保计算机科学教育的设计是包容的、有效的,并且对所有学生都有吸引力。因此,本文报告了一个包容性数字学习平台的设计和实施,以及相应的脚手架课程,并将编码融入小学年龄学生(大约9-12岁)的写作教学。在本文中,我们报告了教师使用编写和编码(CoCo)平台和课程的情况,学生如何使用其功能,以及它对学生计算思维技能和编码态度的影响。方法采用混合方法对11名教师和595名3-6年级学生进行数据分析。数据来源包括教师反思和访谈、学生计算思维评估和学生编程态度调查。定量数据采用描述性和配对样本t检验进行分析。采用开放编码对定性数据进行归纳分析,确定紧急类别。结果与结论研究结果表明:(1)大多数学生有效地利用CoCo平台在Scratch中规划他们的工作和编码,使用自我评价和自我监控功能的比例较小;(2)教师对CoCo平台和课程总体持积极态度,并强烈支持在未来使用它;(3)学生的计算思维技能在项目过程中得到了提高。结果表明,效应量很大(g = 1.24),并且(4)学生态度的结果是混合的,这为学生在学习编程时面临的障碍提供了见解。总体而言,本研究表明,CoCo平台和课程有望成为小学学生基础计算机科学教学的框架,结构化和集成工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scaffolding Coding Instruction Through Literacy via the Compose and Code Digital Platform and Curriculum

Background

In recent years, computer science education has emerged as a necessary part of school curricula for students of all ages. With such momentum in this direction, it is essential that program designers, educators, and researchers ensure that computer science education is designed to be inclusive, effective, and engaging for all students.

Objective

Accordingly, this paper reports on the design and implementation of an inclusive digital learning platform and accompanying curriculum for scaffolding and integrating coding into writing instruction for elementary-aged students (approximately ages 9–12). In this paper, we report on teachers' uses of the Compose and Code (CoCo) platform and curriculum, how students used its features, and its influence on students' computational thinking skills and attitudes about coding.

Method

Data analysed in this mixed-methods study come from 11 teachers and 595 students in Grades 3–6. Data sources included teacher reflections and interviews, an assessment of computational thinking for students, and a coding attitudes survey for students. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and using paired sample t-tests. Qualitative data were analysed inductively using open coding to determine emergent categories.

Results and Conclusion

Findings indicate that (1) a majority of students effectively used the CoCo platform to plan their work and code in Scratch, with a smaller percentage using the self-evaluation and self-monitoring features, (2) teachers indicated overall positive perceptions of the CoCo platform and curriculum, with strong support for using it in the future, (3) students' computational thinking skills improved over the course of the project, with results indicating a large effect size (g = 1.24), and (4) student attitudinal results were mixed, providing insights to the barriers that students face when learning to code. Overall, this study indicates that the CoCo platform and curriculum show promise as a scaffolded, structured, and integrated tool for teaching elementary computer science to elementary grade students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信