通过人工智能(AI)增强工程学生的能力:将人类-人工智能创造性思维过程与ChatGPT相结合

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Rosó Baltà-Salvador, Ismail El-Madafri, Enric Brasó-Vives, Marta Peña
{"title":"通过人工智能(AI)增强工程学生的能力:将人类-人工智能创造性思维过程与ChatGPT相结合","authors":"Rosó Baltà-Salvador,&nbsp;Ismail El-Madafri,&nbsp;Enric Brasó-Vives,&nbsp;Marta Peña","doi":"10.1002/cae.22817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into education has the potential to revolutionize how students engage in academic activities and tasks. This research empirically analyses the influence of AI on creative ideation within educational settings to validate AI's role in enhancing human creativity since creative tasks, which inherently rely on human intuition, emotion and divergent thinking, may be stifled by systematic AI tools. The study explores whether ChatGPT can aid the creative process or inadvertently limit human creativity with a mixed-method approach consisting of a randomized controlled experiment with third-year engineering students in which a total of 728 ideas were obtained, along with a structured survey. The results revealed a predominantly positive perception towards AI-assisted ideation; nevertheless, concerns were raised about AI's influence on creativity and innovation. While no significant differences in ideation outcomes were observed between the groups that used AI and those that did not, significant differences emerged between students who had prior experience with ChatGPT and those who did not. Qualitative insights provided a nuanced view of student experiences on blended human–AI ideation processes, shedding light on its advantages and disadvantages in educational practices. This research also underscores critical considerations and potential risks associated with the adoption of AI, suggesting that while AI has a place in educational settings, its role should be carefully calibrated to support rather than stifle student creativity and innovation. From the findings, the study provides practical recommendations and best practices regarding the integration of AI tools in education.</p>","PeriodicalId":50643,"journal":{"name":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cae.22817","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empowering Engineering Students Through Artificial Intelligence (AI): Blended Human–AI Creative Ideation Processes With ChatGPT\",\"authors\":\"Rosó Baltà-Salvador,&nbsp;Ismail El-Madafri,&nbsp;Enric Brasó-Vives,&nbsp;Marta Peña\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cae.22817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into education has the potential to revolutionize how students engage in academic activities and tasks. This research empirically analyses the influence of AI on creative ideation within educational settings to validate AI's role in enhancing human creativity since creative tasks, which inherently rely on human intuition, emotion and divergent thinking, may be stifled by systematic AI tools. The study explores whether ChatGPT can aid the creative process or inadvertently limit human creativity with a mixed-method approach consisting of a randomized controlled experiment with third-year engineering students in which a total of 728 ideas were obtained, along with a structured survey. The results revealed a predominantly positive perception towards AI-assisted ideation; nevertheless, concerns were raised about AI's influence on creativity and innovation. While no significant differences in ideation outcomes were observed between the groups that used AI and those that did not, significant differences emerged between students who had prior experience with ChatGPT and those who did not. Qualitative insights provided a nuanced view of student experiences on blended human–AI ideation processes, shedding light on its advantages and disadvantages in educational practices. This research also underscores critical considerations and potential risks associated with the adoption of AI, suggesting that while AI has a place in educational settings, its role should be carefully calibrated to support rather than stifle student creativity and innovation. From the findings, the study provides practical recommendations and best practices regarding the integration of AI tools in education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Applications in Engineering Education\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cae.22817\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Applications in Engineering Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.22817\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.22817","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)与教育的整合有可能彻底改变学生参与学术活动和任务的方式。本研究实证分析了人工智能对教育环境中创造性思维的影响,以验证人工智能在增强人类创造力方面的作用,因为创造性任务本质上依赖于人类的直觉、情感和发散性思维,可能会被系统的人工智能工具扼杀。该研究探讨了ChatGPT是否可以帮助创造过程或无意中限制了人类的创造力,该研究采用混合方法,包括对三年级工程专业学生进行随机对照实验,共获得728个想法,以及一项结构化调查。结果显示,对人工智能辅助思维的看法主要是积极的;然而,人们对人工智能对创造力和创新的影响表示担忧。虽然在使用人工智能的组和未使用人工智能的组之间的思维结果没有显著差异,但在之前使用过ChatGPT的学生和没有使用过ChatGPT的学生之间出现了显著差异。定性的见解提供了一种细致入微的观点,即学生在混合人类-人工智能思维过程中的体验,揭示了其在教育实践中的优缺点。这项研究还强调了与采用人工智能相关的关键考虑因素和潜在风险,这表明,尽管人工智能在教育环境中占有一席之地,但它的作用应该仔细校准,以支持而不是扼杀学生的创造力和创新。根据研究结果,该研究提供了有关将人工智能工具整合到教育中的实用建议和最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Empowering Engineering Students Through Artificial Intelligence (AI): Blended Human–AI Creative Ideation Processes With ChatGPT

Empowering Engineering Students Through Artificial Intelligence (AI): Blended Human–AI Creative Ideation Processes With ChatGPT

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into education has the potential to revolutionize how students engage in academic activities and tasks. This research empirically analyses the influence of AI on creative ideation within educational settings to validate AI's role in enhancing human creativity since creative tasks, which inherently rely on human intuition, emotion and divergent thinking, may be stifled by systematic AI tools. The study explores whether ChatGPT can aid the creative process or inadvertently limit human creativity with a mixed-method approach consisting of a randomized controlled experiment with third-year engineering students in which a total of 728 ideas were obtained, along with a structured survey. The results revealed a predominantly positive perception towards AI-assisted ideation; nevertheless, concerns were raised about AI's influence on creativity and innovation. While no significant differences in ideation outcomes were observed between the groups that used AI and those that did not, significant differences emerged between students who had prior experience with ChatGPT and those who did not. Qualitative insights provided a nuanced view of student experiences on blended human–AI ideation processes, shedding light on its advantages and disadvantages in educational practices. This research also underscores critical considerations and potential risks associated with the adoption of AI, suggesting that while AI has a place in educational settings, its role should be carefully calibrated to support rather than stifle student creativity and innovation. From the findings, the study provides practical recommendations and best practices regarding the integration of AI tools in education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Computer Applications in Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Applications in Engineering Education provides a forum for publishing peer-reviewed timely information on the innovative uses of computers, Internet, and software tools in engineering education. Besides new courses and software tools, the CAE journal covers areas that support the integration of technology-based modules in the engineering curriculum and promotes discussion of the assessment and dissemination issues associated with these new implementation methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信