探索社会规定中的模糊性:基于对现有方案中核心组成部分和概念要素的范围审查,创建一种模型类型

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Le-Tien Bhaskar, Gillian Mulvale, Vivien Underdown, Mike Des Jardins
{"title":"探索社会规定中的模糊性:基于对现有方案中核心组成部分和概念要素的范围审查,创建一种模型类型","authors":"Le-Tien Bhaskar,&nbsp;Gillian Mulvale,&nbsp;Vivien Underdown,&nbsp;Mike Des Jardins","doi":"10.1155/hsc/9390387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Introduction:</b> Despite a growing social prescribing (SP) movement, the concept itself remains ambiguous, resulting in considerable variation in practice across different contexts. As discussions of SP emerge at the policy level, this ambiguity may influence program and policy spread. This research explores current literature and practices of SP to understand the different conceptual elements (i.e., goals and motivations) and core components (i.e., structures and behaviors) of SP.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A scoping review of academic literature was conducted. Search terms included “social prescr <sup>∗</sup>,” “social medicine,” “link worker,” “social refer <sup>∗</sup>,” and “community refer <sup>∗</sup>.” From this data, a typology of models based on descriptions of conceptual elements and core components was developed. Following the development of the typology, we applied our findings to existing SP programs, which were found through reference-checking academic sources and a community consultation conducted by our partner organization.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> 29 articles informed the scoping review, and 24 program descriptions were compared to the typology. Four models of SP are proposed. The clinical model follows a biomedical approach where the physician refers patients to SP services primarily geared to lifestyle factors. The holistic model addresses social determinants of health, referring to food security, housing, or income programs. The empowerment model considers well-being through relationship-building and a deep understanding of the client context. The healthy community’s model focuses on community development, where community members gain the capacity to better support one another.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> The proposed typology will help implementers design programs that best suit their goals and contexts. At the policy level, this research demonstrates how a “bounded ambiguity” approach may allow SP to demonstrate its fullest potential. For researchers, this work provides a foundation for future exploration of how SP is implemented despite its ambiguity.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/9390387","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Ambiguity in Social Prescribing: Creating a Typology of Models Based on a Scoping Review of Core Components and Conceptual Elements in Existing Programs\",\"authors\":\"Le-Tien Bhaskar,&nbsp;Gillian Mulvale,&nbsp;Vivien Underdown,&nbsp;Mike Des Jardins\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/hsc/9390387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Introduction:</b> Despite a growing social prescribing (SP) movement, the concept itself remains ambiguous, resulting in considerable variation in practice across different contexts. As discussions of SP emerge at the policy level, this ambiguity may influence program and policy spread. This research explores current literature and practices of SP to understand the different conceptual elements (i.e., goals and motivations) and core components (i.e., structures and behaviors) of SP.</p>\\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A scoping review of academic literature was conducted. Search terms included “social prescr <sup>∗</sup>,” “social medicine,” “link worker,” “social refer <sup>∗</sup>,” and “community refer <sup>∗</sup>.” From this data, a typology of models based on descriptions of conceptual elements and core components was developed. Following the development of the typology, we applied our findings to existing SP programs, which were found through reference-checking academic sources and a community consultation conducted by our partner organization.</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> 29 articles informed the scoping review, and 24 program descriptions were compared to the typology. Four models of SP are proposed. The clinical model follows a biomedical approach where the physician refers patients to SP services primarily geared to lifestyle factors. The holistic model addresses social determinants of health, referring to food security, housing, or income programs. The empowerment model considers well-being through relationship-building and a deep understanding of the client context. The healthy community’s model focuses on community development, where community members gain the capacity to better support one another.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> The proposed typology will help implementers design programs that best suit their goals and contexts. At the policy level, this research demonstrates how a “bounded ambiguity” approach may allow SP to demonstrate its fullest potential. For researchers, this work provides a foundation for future exploration of how SP is implemented despite its ambiguity.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health & Social Care in the Community\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/9390387\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health & Social Care in the Community\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/9390387\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/9390387","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:尽管社会处方(SP)运动不断发展,但这一概念本身仍然模糊不清,导致不同背景下的实践存在相当大的差异。随着SP的讨论出现在政策层面,这种模糊性可能会影响计划和政策的传播。本研究通过对社会服务理论的现有文献和实践进行梳理,了解社会服务理论的不同概念要素(即目标和动机)和核心要素(即结构和行为)。方法:对学术文献进行范围综述。搜索词包括“社会处方*”、“社会医学”、“链接工作者”、“社会参考*”和“社区参考*”。根据这些数据,开发了基于概念元素和核心组件描述的模型类型学。随着类型学的发展,我们将我们的发现应用于现有的SP项目,这些项目是通过参考资料检查学术资源和由我们的合作伙伴组织进行的社区咨询找到的。结果:29篇文献进行了范围审查,24篇项目描述与类型学进行了比较。提出了四种SP模型。临床模式遵循生物医学方法,医生将患者推荐到主要针对生活方式因素的SP服务。整体模型涉及健康的社会决定因素,涉及食品安全、住房或收入计划。授权模型通过建立关系和对客户环境的深刻理解来考虑幸福。健康社区的模式侧重于社区发展,社区成员获得更好地相互支持的能力。结论:提出的类型学将帮助实现者设计最适合其目标和环境的程序。在政策层面,本研究展示了“有限模糊”方法如何允许SP展示其最大潜力。对于研究人员来说,这项工作为未来探索SP如何实现提供了基础,尽管它的模糊性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring Ambiguity in Social Prescribing: Creating a Typology of Models Based on a Scoping Review of Core Components and Conceptual Elements in Existing Programs

Exploring Ambiguity in Social Prescribing: Creating a Typology of Models Based on a Scoping Review of Core Components and Conceptual Elements in Existing Programs

Introduction: Despite a growing social prescribing (SP) movement, the concept itself remains ambiguous, resulting in considerable variation in practice across different contexts. As discussions of SP emerge at the policy level, this ambiguity may influence program and policy spread. This research explores current literature and practices of SP to understand the different conceptual elements (i.e., goals and motivations) and core components (i.e., structures and behaviors) of SP.

Methods: A scoping review of academic literature was conducted. Search terms included “social prescr ,” “social medicine,” “link worker,” “social refer ,” and “community refer .” From this data, a typology of models based on descriptions of conceptual elements and core components was developed. Following the development of the typology, we applied our findings to existing SP programs, which were found through reference-checking academic sources and a community consultation conducted by our partner organization.

Results: 29 articles informed the scoping review, and 24 program descriptions were compared to the typology. Four models of SP are proposed. The clinical model follows a biomedical approach where the physician refers patients to SP services primarily geared to lifestyle factors. The holistic model addresses social determinants of health, referring to food security, housing, or income programs. The empowerment model considers well-being through relationship-building and a deep understanding of the client context. The healthy community’s model focuses on community development, where community members gain the capacity to better support one another.

Conclusion: The proposed typology will help implementers design programs that best suit their goals and contexts. At the policy level, this research demonstrates how a “bounded ambiguity” approach may allow SP to demonstrate its fullest potential. For researchers, this work provides a foundation for future exploration of how SP is implemented despite its ambiguity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信