逆行肾内手术中预置支架和膀胱引流对盆腔内压力的影响

IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1002/bco2.490
Sezgin Yeni, Hakan Kilicarslan, Gokhan Ocakoglu, Burhan Coskun, Mehmet Cagatay Cicek, Kadir Omur Gunseren, Ismet Yavascaoglu, Onur Kaygisiz
{"title":"逆行肾内手术中预置支架和膀胱引流对盆腔内压力的影响","authors":"Sezgin Yeni,&nbsp;Hakan Kilicarslan,&nbsp;Gokhan Ocakoglu,&nbsp;Burhan Coskun,&nbsp;Mehmet Cagatay Cicek,&nbsp;Kadir Omur Gunseren,&nbsp;Ismet Yavascaoglu,&nbsp;Onur Kaygisiz","doi":"10.1002/bco2.490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to assess the effect of pre-stenting and bladder drainage on intrapelvic pressure (IP) during Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Eighty-five consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled and meticulously recorded in a data form. Forty-two patients meeting the inclusion criteria after applying exclusion factors. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (21 patients with preoperative JJ stents) and Group 2 (21 patients without preoperative JJ stents). IP was measured during RIRS, and the impact of various factors, including pre-stenting, bladder drainage and hydronephrosis (HN) grade, on IP was analysed through univariate and multiple linear regression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The perioperative mean highest IP (78 ± 18.2 mmHg vs. 110 ± 23.9 mmHg), median lowest IP (29 mmHg vs. 42 mmHg) and median overall IP (41 mmHg vs. 69 mmHg) were significantly lower in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (all p &lt; 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that pre-stenting and mild HN (Grade 0–1) were independent predictors of reduced IP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Pre-stenting led to a significant reduction in IP during RIRS, likely due to passive ureteral dilation. Additionally, bladder drainage with urethral catheter further decreased IP. These findings suggest that pre-stenting and bladder drainage should be considered as strategies to reduce IP during RIRS, potentially improving surgical outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.490","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of pre-stenting and bladder dranaige on intrapelvic pressure during retrograde intrarenal surgery\",\"authors\":\"Sezgin Yeni,&nbsp;Hakan Kilicarslan,&nbsp;Gokhan Ocakoglu,&nbsp;Burhan Coskun,&nbsp;Mehmet Cagatay Cicek,&nbsp;Kadir Omur Gunseren,&nbsp;Ismet Yavascaoglu,&nbsp;Onur Kaygisiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bco2.490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aims to assess the effect of pre-stenting and bladder drainage on intrapelvic pressure (IP) during Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eighty-five consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled and meticulously recorded in a data form. Forty-two patients meeting the inclusion criteria after applying exclusion factors. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (21 patients with preoperative JJ stents) and Group 2 (21 patients without preoperative JJ stents). IP was measured during RIRS, and the impact of various factors, including pre-stenting, bladder drainage and hydronephrosis (HN) grade, on IP was analysed through univariate and multiple linear regression.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The perioperative mean highest IP (78 ± 18.2 mmHg vs. 110 ± 23.9 mmHg), median lowest IP (29 mmHg vs. 42 mmHg) and median overall IP (41 mmHg vs. 69 mmHg) were significantly lower in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (all p &lt; 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that pre-stenting and mild HN (Grade 0–1) were independent predictors of reduced IP.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pre-stenting led to a significant reduction in IP during RIRS, likely due to passive ureteral dilation. Additionally, bladder drainage with urethral catheter further decreased IP. These findings suggest that pre-stenting and bladder drainage should be considered as strategies to reduce IP during RIRS, potentially improving surgical outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJUI compass\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.490\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJUI compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.490\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨逆行肾内手术(RIRS)中预支架植入和膀胱引流对盆腔内压(IP)的影响。方法前瞻性连续纳入85例患者,详细记录资料。应用排除因子后,42例患者符合纳入标准。将患者分为两组:1组(术前植入JJ支架21例)和2组(术前未植入JJ支架21例)。在RIRS期间测量IP,并通过单变量和多元线性回归分析各种因素(包括支架植入前、膀胱引流和肾积水(HN)等级)对IP的影响。结果1组围手术期平均最高IP(78±18.2 mmHg vs 110±23.9 mmHg)、中位最低IP (29 mmHg vs 42 mmHg)和中位总IP (41 mmHg vs 69 mmHg)均显著低于2组(p < 0.001)。多因素分析显示支架植入前和轻度HN(0-1级)是IP降低的独立预测因素。结论预支架置入可显著降低RIRS期间的IP,可能是由于被动输尿管扩张所致。此外,膀胱导尿管引流进一步降低了IP。这些发现表明,预支架植入和膀胱引流应被视为减少RIRS期间IP的策略,可能会改善手术结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of pre-stenting and bladder dranaige on intrapelvic pressure during retrograde intrarenal surgery

Impact of pre-stenting and bladder dranaige on intrapelvic pressure during retrograde intrarenal surgery

Purpose

This study aims to assess the effect of pre-stenting and bladder drainage on intrapelvic pressure (IP) during Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS).

Methods

Eighty-five consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled and meticulously recorded in a data form. Forty-two patients meeting the inclusion criteria after applying exclusion factors. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (21 patients with preoperative JJ stents) and Group 2 (21 patients without preoperative JJ stents). IP was measured during RIRS, and the impact of various factors, including pre-stenting, bladder drainage and hydronephrosis (HN) grade, on IP was analysed through univariate and multiple linear regression.

Results

The perioperative mean highest IP (78 ± 18.2 mmHg vs. 110 ± 23.9 mmHg), median lowest IP (29 mmHg vs. 42 mmHg) and median overall IP (41 mmHg vs. 69 mmHg) were significantly lower in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (all p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that pre-stenting and mild HN (Grade 0–1) were independent predictors of reduced IP.

Conclusion

Pre-stenting led to a significant reduction in IP during RIRS, likely due to passive ureteral dilation. Additionally, bladder drainage with urethral catheter further decreased IP. These findings suggest that pre-stenting and bladder drainage should be considered as strategies to reduce IP during RIRS, potentially improving surgical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信