为什么参与者对评估中心练习的感知很重要:公正、动机、自我效能和绩效

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Sylvia G. Roch, Kathryn Devon
{"title":"为什么参与者对评估中心练习的感知很重要:公正、动机、自我效能和绩效","authors":"Sylvia G. Roch,&nbsp;Kathryn Devon","doi":"10.1111/ijsa.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Despite expectations, assessment center (AC) participants' performance ratings often are not strongly correlated over AC exercises. Why is a puzzle? Perhaps one piece of the puzzle is that participants view AC exercises with varying levels of motivation, justice, and self-efficacy, which relate to exercise performance, the topic of the current research. Based on 123 participants completing an AC consisting of six exercises (two leaderless group discussions, oral presentation, written case analysis, personality assessment, and cognitive ability exercise), results showed that motivation, self-efficacy, and procedural justice levels differed among exercises, which generally related to exercise performance. Two interventions designed to improve how participants perceive AC exercises (one focusing on self-efficacy and the other on justice) were not successful. Implications are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51465,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Selection and Assessment","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Participant Perceptions of Assessment Center Exercises Matter: Justice, Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Performance\",\"authors\":\"Sylvia G. Roch,&nbsp;Kathryn Devon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijsa.70002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Despite expectations, assessment center (AC) participants' performance ratings often are not strongly correlated over AC exercises. Why is a puzzle? Perhaps one piece of the puzzle is that participants view AC exercises with varying levels of motivation, justice, and self-efficacy, which relate to exercise performance, the topic of the current research. Based on 123 participants completing an AC consisting of six exercises (two leaderless group discussions, oral presentation, written case analysis, personality assessment, and cognitive ability exercise), results showed that motivation, self-efficacy, and procedural justice levels differed among exercises, which generally related to exercise performance. Two interventions designed to improve how participants perceive AC exercises (one focusing on self-efficacy and the other on justice) were not successful. Implications are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Selection and Assessment\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Selection and Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsa.70002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Selection and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsa.70002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管预期,评估中心(AC)参与者的表现评级往往不强相关的AC练习。为什么是谜题?也许其中一个谜团是,参与者对AC运动的动机、公正和自我效能感的看法各不相同,而这些都与运动表现有关,这也是当前研究的主题。123名参与者完成了由6个练习(2个无领导小组讨论、口头陈述、书面案例分析、人格评估和认知能力练习)组成的交流,结果表明,不同练习的动机、自我效能和程序正义水平不同,这些水平通常与锻炼表现有关。两项旨在改善参与者如何看待交流练习的干预措施(一项关注自我效能,另一项关注公正)没有成功。讨论了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Participant Perceptions of Assessment Center Exercises Matter: Justice, Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Performance

Despite expectations, assessment center (AC) participants' performance ratings often are not strongly correlated over AC exercises. Why is a puzzle? Perhaps one piece of the puzzle is that participants view AC exercises with varying levels of motivation, justice, and self-efficacy, which relate to exercise performance, the topic of the current research. Based on 123 participants completing an AC consisting of six exercises (two leaderless group discussions, oral presentation, written case analysis, personality assessment, and cognitive ability exercise), results showed that motivation, self-efficacy, and procedural justice levels differed among exercises, which generally related to exercise performance. Two interventions designed to improve how participants perceive AC exercises (one focusing on self-efficacy and the other on justice) were not successful. Implications are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
31.80%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Selection and Assessment publishes original articles related to all aspects of personnel selection, staffing, and assessment in organizations. Using an effective combination of academic research with professional-led best practice, IJSA aims to develop new knowledge and understanding in these important areas of work psychology and contemporary workforce management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信