房室传导阻滞患者新发肝束与左束支区起搏AHRE中期比较

IF 2.2 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Catalin Pestrea MD, PhD, Ecaterina Cicala MD, Roxana Enache MD, Marcela Rusu MD, Radu Gavrilescu MD, Adrian Vaduva MD, Sever Risca MD, Dana Clapon MD, Florin Ortan MD
{"title":"房室传导阻滞患者新发肝束与左束支区起搏AHRE中期比较","authors":"Catalin Pestrea MD, PhD,&nbsp;Ecaterina Cicala MD,&nbsp;Roxana Enache MD,&nbsp;Marcela Rusu MD,&nbsp;Radu Gavrilescu MD,&nbsp;Adrian Vaduva MD,&nbsp;Sever Risca MD,&nbsp;Dana Clapon MD,&nbsp;Florin Ortan MD","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Atrial high-rate episodes (AHRE) detected by cardiac implanted electronic devices are known markers for adverse cardiac events. Previous studies have shown that the incidence of new-onset AHREs in patients with right ventricular pacing reaches 50%. At the same time, His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) were associated with significantly fewer AHRE. This study aimed to compare the incidence of new-onset AHRE between HBP and LBBAP in patients with atrioventricular block and no history of atrial fibrillation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>One hundred and forty-two patients, fifty-nine with HBP and eighty-three with LBBAP for advanced atrioventricular block, were prospectively followed for new-onset AHRE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The mean follow-up period was 624 ± 148.6 days for the HBP patients and 663.4 ± 157.4 days for the LBBAP patients. New-onset AHRE was encountered in 8 of 59 patients (13.5%) with HBP and 14 of 83 (16.8%) with LBBAP (hazard ratio—0.91, log rank <i>p</i> = .84). In the multivariate Cox regression model, HBP and LBBAP had similar predictive values, while only age and diabetes mellitus were significantly associated with new-onset AHRE occurrence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>HBP and LBBAP were associated with a similar incidence of device-detected new-onset AHRE during a medium-term follow-up period in patients with atrioventricular block and no history of atrial fibrillation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mid-term comparison of new-onset AHRE between His bundle and left bundle branch area pacing in patients with AV block\",\"authors\":\"Catalin Pestrea MD, PhD,&nbsp;Ecaterina Cicala MD,&nbsp;Roxana Enache MD,&nbsp;Marcela Rusu MD,&nbsp;Radu Gavrilescu MD,&nbsp;Adrian Vaduva MD,&nbsp;Sever Risca MD,&nbsp;Dana Clapon MD,&nbsp;Florin Ortan MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joa3.70009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Atrial high-rate episodes (AHRE) detected by cardiac implanted electronic devices are known markers for adverse cardiac events. Previous studies have shown that the incidence of new-onset AHREs in patients with right ventricular pacing reaches 50%. At the same time, His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) were associated with significantly fewer AHRE. This study aimed to compare the incidence of new-onset AHRE between HBP and LBBAP in patients with atrioventricular block and no history of atrial fibrillation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>One hundred and forty-two patients, fifty-nine with HBP and eighty-three with LBBAP for advanced atrioventricular block, were prospectively followed for new-onset AHRE.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The mean follow-up period was 624 ± 148.6 days for the HBP patients and 663.4 ± 157.4 days for the LBBAP patients. New-onset AHRE was encountered in 8 of 59 patients (13.5%) with HBP and 14 of 83 (16.8%) with LBBAP (hazard ratio—0.91, log rank <i>p</i> = .84). In the multivariate Cox regression model, HBP and LBBAP had similar predictive values, while only age and diabetes mellitus were significantly associated with new-onset AHRE occurrence.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>HBP and LBBAP were associated with a similar incidence of device-detected new-onset AHRE during a medium-term follow-up period in patients with atrioventricular block and no history of atrial fibrillation.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70009\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arrhythmia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心脏植入电子设备检测心房高速率发作(AHRE)是已知的心脏不良事件的标志物。既往研究表明,右室起搏患者新发AHREs的发生率可达50%。同时,他束起搏(HBP)和左束分支起搏(LBBAP)与AHRE显著减少相关。本研究旨在比较HBP和LBBAP在无房颤病史的房室传导阻滞患者中新发AHRE的发生率。方法对142例新发AHRE患者进行前瞻性随访,其中59例HBP患者,83例LBBAP患者为晚期房室传导阻滞患者。结果HBP组平均随访时间为624±148.6天,LBBAP组平均随访时间为663.4±157.4天。59例HBP患者中有8例(13.5%)出现新发AHRE, 83例LBBAP患者中有14例(16.8%)出现新发AHRE(风险比0.91,log rank p = 0.84)。在多变量Cox回归模型中,HBP和LBBAP具有相似的预测价值,而只有年龄和糖尿病与新发AHRE的发生显著相关。结论在无房颤病史的房室传导阻滞患者中期随访期间,HBP和LBBAP与器械检测新发AHRE的发生率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mid-term comparison of new-onset AHRE between His bundle and left bundle branch area pacing in patients with AV block

Mid-term comparison of new-onset AHRE between His bundle and left bundle branch area pacing in patients with AV block

Background

Atrial high-rate episodes (AHRE) detected by cardiac implanted electronic devices are known markers for adverse cardiac events. Previous studies have shown that the incidence of new-onset AHREs in patients with right ventricular pacing reaches 50%. At the same time, His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) were associated with significantly fewer AHRE. This study aimed to compare the incidence of new-onset AHRE between HBP and LBBAP in patients with atrioventricular block and no history of atrial fibrillation.

Methods

One hundred and forty-two patients, fifty-nine with HBP and eighty-three with LBBAP for advanced atrioventricular block, were prospectively followed for new-onset AHRE.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 624 ± 148.6 days for the HBP patients and 663.4 ± 157.4 days for the LBBAP patients. New-onset AHRE was encountered in 8 of 59 patients (13.5%) with HBP and 14 of 83 (16.8%) with LBBAP (hazard ratio—0.91, log rank p = .84). In the multivariate Cox regression model, HBP and LBBAP had similar predictive values, while only age and diabetes mellitus were significantly associated with new-onset AHRE occurrence.

Conclusion

HBP and LBBAP were associated with a similar incidence of device-detected new-onset AHRE during a medium-term follow-up period in patients with atrioventricular block and no history of atrial fibrillation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arrhythmia
Journal of Arrhythmia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信