从空间明确的捕获-再捕获数据建模疾病动力学

IF 1.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmetrics Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1002/env.2888
Fabian R. Ketwaroo, Eleni Matechou, Matthew Silk, Richard Delahay
{"title":"从空间明确的捕获-再捕获数据建模疾病动力学","authors":"Fabian R. Ketwaroo,&nbsp;Eleni Matechou,&nbsp;Matthew Silk,&nbsp;Richard Delahay","doi":"10.1002/env.2888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>One of the main aims of wildlife disease ecology is to identify how disease dynamics vary in space and time and as a function of population density. However, monitoring spatiotemporal and density-dependent disease dynamics in the wild is challenging because the observation process is error-prone, which means that individuals, their disease status, and their spatial locations are unobservable, or only imperfectly observed. In this paper, we develop a novel spatially-explicit capture-recapture (SCR) model motivated by an SCR data set on European badgers (<i>Meles meles</i>), naturally infected with bovine tuberculosis (<i>Mycobacterium bovis</i>, TB). Our model accounts for the observation process of individuals as a function of their latent activity centers, and for their imperfectly observed disease status and its effect on demographic rates and behavior. This framework has the advantage of simultaneously modeling population demographics and disease dynamics within a spatial context. It can therefore generate estimates of critical parameters such as population size; local and global density by disease status and hence spatially-explicit disease prevalence; disease transmission probabilities as functions of local or global population density; and demographic rates as functions of disease status. Our findings suggest that infected badgers have lower survival probability but larger home range areas than uninfected badgers, and that the data do not provide strong evidence that density has a non-zero effect on disease transmission. We also present a simulation study, considering different scenarios of disease transmission within the population, and our findings highlight the importance of accounting for spatial variation in disease transmission and individual disease status when these affect demographic rates. Collectively these results show our new model enables a better understanding of how wildlife disease dynamics are linked to population demographics within a spatiotemporal context.</p>","PeriodicalId":50512,"journal":{"name":"Environmetrics","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/env.2888","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling Disease Dynamics From Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture Data\",\"authors\":\"Fabian R. Ketwaroo,&nbsp;Eleni Matechou,&nbsp;Matthew Silk,&nbsp;Richard Delahay\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/env.2888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>One of the main aims of wildlife disease ecology is to identify how disease dynamics vary in space and time and as a function of population density. However, monitoring spatiotemporal and density-dependent disease dynamics in the wild is challenging because the observation process is error-prone, which means that individuals, their disease status, and their spatial locations are unobservable, or only imperfectly observed. In this paper, we develop a novel spatially-explicit capture-recapture (SCR) model motivated by an SCR data set on European badgers (<i>Meles meles</i>), naturally infected with bovine tuberculosis (<i>Mycobacterium bovis</i>, TB). Our model accounts for the observation process of individuals as a function of their latent activity centers, and for their imperfectly observed disease status and its effect on demographic rates and behavior. This framework has the advantage of simultaneously modeling population demographics and disease dynamics within a spatial context. It can therefore generate estimates of critical parameters such as population size; local and global density by disease status and hence spatially-explicit disease prevalence; disease transmission probabilities as functions of local or global population density; and demographic rates as functions of disease status. Our findings suggest that infected badgers have lower survival probability but larger home range areas than uninfected badgers, and that the data do not provide strong evidence that density has a non-zero effect on disease transmission. We also present a simulation study, considering different scenarios of disease transmission within the population, and our findings highlight the importance of accounting for spatial variation in disease transmission and individual disease status when these affect demographic rates. Collectively these results show our new model enables a better understanding of how wildlife disease dynamics are linked to population demographics within a spatiotemporal context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmetrics\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/env.2888\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.2888\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmetrics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.2888","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

野生动物疾病生态学的主要目的之一是确定疾病动态在空间和时间上以及作为种群密度的函数是如何变化的。然而,在野外监测时空和密度依赖的疾病动态是具有挑战性的,因为观察过程容易出错,这意味着个体、他们的疾病状态和他们的空间位置是不可观察的,或者只是不完全观察。在本文中,我们开发了一种新的空间显式捕获-再捕获(SCR)模型,该模型由自然感染牛结核病(牛分枝杆菌,TB)的欧洲獾(Meles Meles)的SCR数据集驱动。我们的模型解释了个体的观察过程,作为其潜在活动中心的函数,以及他们不完全观察到的疾病状态及其对人口统计率和行为的影响。该框架的优点是可以在空间背景下同时对人口统计和疾病动态进行建模。因此,它可以产生关键参数的估计,如人口规模;按疾病状况划分的地方和全球密度,因此具有明确的疾病流行空间;疾病传播概率与当地或全球人口密度的关系;人口比率是疾病状态的函数。我们的研究结果表明,与未感染的獾相比,受感染的獾的生存概率较低,但其活动范围更大,而且数据并没有提供强有力的证据表明密度对疾病传播具有非零影响。我们还提出了一项模拟研究,考虑了人群中疾病传播的不同情景,我们的研究结果强调了当疾病传播和个体疾病状态影响人口比率时,考虑疾病传播的空间变化的重要性。总的来说,这些结果表明,我们的新模型能够更好地理解野生动物疾病动态如何与时空背景下的人口统计数据相关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Modeling Disease Dynamics From Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture Data

Modeling Disease Dynamics From Spatially Explicit Capture-Recapture Data

One of the main aims of wildlife disease ecology is to identify how disease dynamics vary in space and time and as a function of population density. However, monitoring spatiotemporal and density-dependent disease dynamics in the wild is challenging because the observation process is error-prone, which means that individuals, their disease status, and their spatial locations are unobservable, or only imperfectly observed. In this paper, we develop a novel spatially-explicit capture-recapture (SCR) model motivated by an SCR data set on European badgers (Meles meles), naturally infected with bovine tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis, TB). Our model accounts for the observation process of individuals as a function of their latent activity centers, and for their imperfectly observed disease status and its effect on demographic rates and behavior. This framework has the advantage of simultaneously modeling population demographics and disease dynamics within a spatial context. It can therefore generate estimates of critical parameters such as population size; local and global density by disease status and hence spatially-explicit disease prevalence; disease transmission probabilities as functions of local or global population density; and demographic rates as functions of disease status. Our findings suggest that infected badgers have lower survival probability but larger home range areas than uninfected badgers, and that the data do not provide strong evidence that density has a non-zero effect on disease transmission. We also present a simulation study, considering different scenarios of disease transmission within the population, and our findings highlight the importance of accounting for spatial variation in disease transmission and individual disease status when these affect demographic rates. Collectively these results show our new model enables a better understanding of how wildlife disease dynamics are linked to population demographics within a spatiotemporal context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmetrics
Environmetrics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
67
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmetrics, the official journal of The International Environmetrics Society (TIES), an Association of the International Statistical Institute, is devoted to the dissemination of high-quality quantitative research in the environmental sciences. The journal welcomes pertinent and innovative submissions from quantitative disciplines developing new statistical and mathematical techniques, methods, and theories that solve modern environmental problems. Articles must proffer substantive, new statistical or mathematical advances to answer important scientific questions in the environmental sciences, or must develop novel or enhanced statistical methodology with clear applications to environmental science. New methods should be illustrated with recent environmental data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信