量子物理学中学习者对模型(不仅)的感知结构:聚焦于格式塔的保真度和功能保真度

IF 5.8 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 OPTICS
Philipp Bitzenbauer, Malte S. Ubben
{"title":"量子物理学中学习者对模型(不仅)的感知结构:聚焦于格式塔的保真度和功能保真度","authors":"Philipp Bitzenbauer,&nbsp;Malte S. Ubben","doi":"10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00316-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In previous research, it has been argued that many of the student (mis-)conceptions of quantum concepts described in the literature as widespread among learners can be traced back to poorly developed (quantum) model perceptions that hinder the learning of quantum physics. In particular, it has been shown that the degrees of two cognitive dimensions, namely Functional Fidelity and Fidelity of Gestalt, in students’ thinking account for a substantial amount of the variance in students’ model perceptions in quantum physics and may therefore be useful for describing and understanding the (development of) students’ conceptions of quantum physics topics. So far, however, the cognitive dimensions Functional Fidelity and Fidelity of Gestalt have only been investigated in exploratory studies. In this article, we report the results of a confirmatory factor analysis of data collected from N = 179 secondary school students using an instrument adapted from the literature to assess learners’ perceptions of the photon model. The results of our study provide empirical evidence that the two-factor model of learners’ model perceptions in the quantum context is indeed a good fit to the data. Together with literature from science education research on students’ conceptual development, and taking into account earlier findings on Fidelity of Function and Gestalt Fidelity we derive a plausible description of students’ conceptual development in the context of quantum physics – leading to what we call the <i>Fidelities-Model of Conceptual Development</i>. We discuss this framework in the light of previous research and argue for its potential generalisability beyond the teaching and learning of quantum physics topics. The implications of our findings for both science education research and practice are presented.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":547,"journal":{"name":"EPJ Quantum Technology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://epjquantumtechnology.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00316-7","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The structure of learners’ perceptions of models (not only) in quantum physics: spotlight on Fidelity of Gestalt and Functional Fidelity\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Bitzenbauer,&nbsp;Malte S. Ubben\",\"doi\":\"10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00316-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In previous research, it has been argued that many of the student (mis-)conceptions of quantum concepts described in the literature as widespread among learners can be traced back to poorly developed (quantum) model perceptions that hinder the learning of quantum physics. In particular, it has been shown that the degrees of two cognitive dimensions, namely Functional Fidelity and Fidelity of Gestalt, in students’ thinking account for a substantial amount of the variance in students’ model perceptions in quantum physics and may therefore be useful for describing and understanding the (development of) students’ conceptions of quantum physics topics. So far, however, the cognitive dimensions Functional Fidelity and Fidelity of Gestalt have only been investigated in exploratory studies. In this article, we report the results of a confirmatory factor analysis of data collected from N = 179 secondary school students using an instrument adapted from the literature to assess learners’ perceptions of the photon model. The results of our study provide empirical evidence that the two-factor model of learners’ model perceptions in the quantum context is indeed a good fit to the data. Together with literature from science education research on students’ conceptual development, and taking into account earlier findings on Fidelity of Function and Gestalt Fidelity we derive a plausible description of students’ conceptual development in the context of quantum physics – leading to what we call the <i>Fidelities-Model of Conceptual Development</i>. We discuss this framework in the light of previous research and argue for its potential generalisability beyond the teaching and learning of quantum physics topics. The implications of our findings for both science education research and practice are presented.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EPJ Quantum Technology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://epjquantumtechnology.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00316-7\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EPJ Quantum Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00316-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPJ Quantum Technology","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00316-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在以前的研究中,有人认为,文献中描述的许多学生(错误)对量子概念的概念在学习者中广泛存在,可以追溯到阻碍量子物理学习的不发达的(量子)模型感知。特别是,研究表明,学生思维中的两个认知维度,即功能保真度和格式塔保真度,在很大程度上解释了学生对量子物理模型感知的差异,因此可能有助于描述和理解学生对量子物理主题概念的(发展)。然而,到目前为止,对功能保真度和格式塔保真度的认知维度只进行了探索性研究。在本文中,我们报告了对N = 179名中学生收集的数据进行验证性因子分析的结果,使用了一种改编自文献的工具来评估学习者对光子模型的感知。我们的研究结果提供了经验证据,证明学习者在量子环境下的模型感知的双因素模型确实很适合数据。结合有关学生概念发展的科学教育研究文献,并考虑到早期关于功能保真度和格式塔保真度的研究结果,我们得出了量子物理背景下学生概念发展的合理描述,从而得出了我们所谓的概念发展保真度模型。我们根据以前的研究讨论了这个框架,并论证了它在量子物理主题的教学和学习之外的潜在普遍性。我们的研究结果对科学教育的研究和实践都有启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The structure of learners’ perceptions of models (not only) in quantum physics: spotlight on Fidelity of Gestalt and Functional Fidelity

In previous research, it has been argued that many of the student (mis-)conceptions of quantum concepts described in the literature as widespread among learners can be traced back to poorly developed (quantum) model perceptions that hinder the learning of quantum physics. In particular, it has been shown that the degrees of two cognitive dimensions, namely Functional Fidelity and Fidelity of Gestalt, in students’ thinking account for a substantial amount of the variance in students’ model perceptions in quantum physics and may therefore be useful for describing and understanding the (development of) students’ conceptions of quantum physics topics. So far, however, the cognitive dimensions Functional Fidelity and Fidelity of Gestalt have only been investigated in exploratory studies. In this article, we report the results of a confirmatory factor analysis of data collected from N = 179 secondary school students using an instrument adapted from the literature to assess learners’ perceptions of the photon model. The results of our study provide empirical evidence that the two-factor model of learners’ model perceptions in the quantum context is indeed a good fit to the data. Together with literature from science education research on students’ conceptual development, and taking into account earlier findings on Fidelity of Function and Gestalt Fidelity we derive a plausible description of students’ conceptual development in the context of quantum physics – leading to what we call the Fidelities-Model of Conceptual Development. We discuss this framework in the light of previous research and argue for its potential generalisability beyond the teaching and learning of quantum physics topics. The implications of our findings for both science education research and practice are presented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EPJ Quantum Technology
EPJ Quantum Technology Physics and Astronomy-Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
28
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Driven by advances in technology and experimental capability, the last decade has seen the emergence of quantum technology: a new praxis for controlling the quantum world. It is now possible to engineer complex, multi-component systems that merge the once distinct fields of quantum optics and condensed matter physics. EPJ Quantum Technology covers theoretical and experimental advances in subjects including but not limited to the following: Quantum measurement, metrology and lithography Quantum complex systems, networks and cellular automata Quantum electromechanical systems Quantum optomechanical systems Quantum machines, engineering and nanorobotics Quantum control theory Quantum information, communication and computation Quantum thermodynamics Quantum metamaterials The effect of Casimir forces on micro- and nano-electromechanical systems Quantum biology Quantum sensing Hybrid quantum systems Quantum simulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信